Mediafiya. Poisoners

Russia, omitted in the railway.

When the party, led by Mr. J., in the first elections to the State Duma in 1993 received more than 20% of the vote, the general confusion from this event and aversion to this character, dominated by the intelligentsia and, in particular, among the writer, expressed the writer Yuri Karyakin with his famous “Russia, you foolish!”.

Two decades have passed. J. and his party in the Duma forever became part of the landscape. True, the result is twice as lower, but he and his party members are so good. The difference is that then, having twice the best result, J. was in some isolation in politics and especially in the media. Today, despite the twice the worst results, he has immeasurably greater attention of the press, becoming her main favorite.

These are not sensations, but the facts: according to the Medialogi company, which summed up the results of the media activity of politicians in the first quarter, in January and February, Mr. J. confidently leads the media rating among all State Duma deputies, and in March is the second after the chairman of the lower house Sergei Naryshkin.

J. performs the functions that, under Hitler, was performed by the editor of the newspaper "Sturmovik" Julius Streicher, whose zoological anti -Semitism, sadism, prohibitive lies and moral unscrupulousness made his society not even acceptable among fascist scumbags. However, Hitler constantly supported him, appreciated the oratory talent and believed that it was necessary to use the human material that is at hand.

Like Julius Streicher, Mr. J., with his actions, completely cancel all the norms. If you can publicly carry one woman by the hair, the other publicly call on to rape, demand to entrust the Caucasus with barbed wire and prohibit women to give birth to women, which means that everything can be. Putin against the backdrop of J. generally d'Artagnan and all in white.

The virus of Putinism so easily mastered the Russian public body, including because the immune system of this body has been suppressed by poison from the TV screens for two decades, where Mr. Zh.

The entire special issue of the Sunday evening program with Vladimir Solovyov on May 16 was devoted to finding out what J. thinks about Ukraine, about the world and about the place of Russia in this world. All 58 minutes of broadcast in Prime-Time Solovyov worked as a stand under the microphone of Mr. J., each word of which was perceived by the leader as a revelation.

Zh. spoke all these words in the same Solovyov. But the repetition, as you know, is not only the mother of the teaching, but also the basis of propaganda. Here is what the Russian public consciousness plunges into: "I (this is about myself) always said that they (Ukrainians) will creep again to us against the gates of the Kremlin." "9 regions of Ukraine from Kherson to Odessa will be separated by forming Novorossia." “Ukraine has no future, it will break up like Yugoslavia.” "Europe also has no future." "Italy, Belgium, France, Spain - all of them are scattered into small pieces." “The city of London, several apartments of Abramovich and the grave of Berezovsky will remain from Britain.” The end of the quote, then a brief presentation.

Having finished Europe, J. with the rest of the world figured out in just a couple of minutes. China is a peripheral country. The USA is also somewhere on the sidelines. We, Russia, are the only center of the world that over the whole world. True, I did not understand how the center of the world can be over the world. But this is clearly my personal vice - a lack of spatial imagination.

At the pace, putting the world in place, J. moved to the main one, to Russia. And then it became clear where everything that breaks down from the falling apart in Europe runs. All this is happy to rush to Russia. Moreover, the economic J. refused to join Russia in the country of Africa and Latin America, agreeing only to the accession of most of Europe. Soloviev first objected here, saying that Cuba had to be taken, because this is a good resort. J. was in a good -natured mood, so he agreed, but set the condition that it was not 15 hours to fly to Cuba, as now, but a maximum of five. On that and decided.

Further, J., not limiting himself to the providence of the nearest future planet Earth, revealed the reasons that this future will provide, and at the same time explained the course of world history. All of it, the history of the world, it turns out, has always been spinning around Russia. And the reason why Russia has become the center of the world, where all the nations are striving, this is our good policy. “We never take anything from anyone and do not offend anyone. We always give everything everything. ” At that moment, I thought that, apparently, therefore, in the century before last, Russia was called the "gendarme of Europe", and at the end of the century of the past, all Eastern European countries, not having time to get out of Russia, burst into NATO. But J., obviously reading my thoughts, immediately explained everything. It turns out that centuries -old dislike of the whole world to Russia is explained by envy and fear.

Then everything fell into place. And most importantly, I remembered where I not only heard these words dozens of times, but also read. Moreover, not in a book written in the genre of alternative history, but in a training manual for universities under the name: "Sociology of world politics." One of the authors, of course, J., and the second - N.A. Vasetsky, head of the analytical department of the State Duma apparatus and at the same time professor of the Faculty of Sociological Faculty of Moscow State University. In this “study manual”, students are invited to study such, for example, chapters: “Russia is a kind soul”, or here's another: “The race of hermaphrodites are coming.” It is clear that in one chapter the essence of Russia is revealed, and in the other a futurological forecast for the West is given. What happens in the head of the student when he is preparing for a seminar or exam on such a “textbook”?

By the way, Julius Streicher also loved to teach and educate young people, taught at school. Then, however, he spun: politics, a newspaper, war ... Well, then there was no reason at all: Nuremberg, sentence, gallows ...

Gulls in the studio from the deputy of the meadow

After Sunday evening, which was Friday, Soloviev spent another Sunday evening, but this time on Sunday, March 18. This time without Zh. However, Solovyov managed to collect a team capable of replacing J. in conjunction such a collective J., which included Konstantin Zatulin, Irina Yarovaya, Avigdor Eskin, Andrei Lugova and a dozen more no less worthy persons.

At some moments, the collective J. could do what J. The individual was clearly not capable of. For example, on the internal discussion, which unfolded between Zatulin and Yarova. Zatulin called for organizing volunteer detachments “as it was in Spain”, to arm them and send them to the aid of Strelkov-Girkin and other leaders of militants in the southeast of Ukraine. Yarovaya drew the attention of Zatulin to the bloody consequences of his proposals, complained that there was no statehood in Ukraine and demanded from the inhabitants of Donbass to direct efforts to the immediate formation of the government.

Representatives of the rebellious regions of Ukraine-Alexander Kofman, the coordinator of the South-East, and Konstantin Dolgov, the leader of the Kharkov militia-were clearly on the side of Zatulin, but only grunted deafly, because they did not dare to openly attack the Yarovaya, which with one species inspired the timidity of everyone, except for Zatulin, accustomed to everything.

But then Konstantin Dolgov justified his participation in the team J., and when Solovyov asked him where the border of the future New Russia would be, without hesitation, he blurted out: “For La Channel”. Soloviev liked the answer, and the hall was applauded. In the spirit of J., there was also the story of Dolgov about how he, being the leader of the Kharkov militia, ended up in Moscow at such a hot time. It turns out that in Kharkov they practically took power and the whole people (according to Dolgov, 96-98%) supports them. But as Dolgov explained: "We were kicked out by the mercenaries '' Yaguar '', who spoke English." And he added: "I am here, but Kharkov did not give up."

I have already met information about the English -language fighters of the “jaguar” (the unit is deployed near Vinnitsa) in the plots of the most honest Lifenews journalists. Since it is absolutely impossible to assume that Life News journalists spread inaccurate information, it remains to conclude that the spirit of ancient Normans woke up in the British guys and they, like a thousand years ago, a detachment of several tens of people captured one and a half million Kharkov.

Two other guests of the countries performed well: the Israeli publicist Avigdor Eskin and the coordinator of the Front of the Liberation of Ukraine Volodymyr Rogov. Eskin demanded that Kolomoisky immediately judge that he was a fascist, anti -Semite, a shame of the Jewish people, and stated that those leaders of Jewish organizations who would not be condemned by Kolomoisky do not have the right to be not only leaders, but also to be called Jews. I was alarming for Yuri Isaakovich Kanner, who had just been re -elected head of the Russian Jewish Congress. After looking at the site of the river, I did not find the condemnation of Kolomoisky there with horror. Apparently, if Kanner does not correct in the near future, then Eskin will cross him out of the Jews.

However, it may cost, because by the end of Sunday evening, Eskin's mood has improved sharply, it became light and ironic. I liked how he joked the name of the presidential candidate Poroshenko, pretending to have forgotten his last name, and thoughtfully repeated several times: “Well, this one, like his ... Parasha ... Parasha, ah, yes, Poroshenko.” Such “family” jokes are usually characteristic of children of preschool and primary school age, and among adolescents, sometimes very young fans of the Moscow “Spartak” joke. The “juvenile” sense of humor Avigdor Eskin shows that this public figure is young with his mind and soul and can serve a good cause for a long time.

The Ukrainian “front-line library” Vladimir Rogov spoke somewhat less successfully. At first he tried to perform with the loud revelation of the new leadership of Ukraine, accusing them of all of non-traditional sexual orientation, and for some reason he cited the Conchit as an example. But Solovyov stopped the development of this topic and said that the sexual orientation of the leaders of Ukraine, in his opinion, is not the main reason for the problems of this country. Rogov clearly did not agree, but did not argue out of respect for the presenter.

But at the end, Rogov gathered his strength and gave out what they expected from him: “Our Slavic Tribunal is waiting for Ukraine! Ukraine will live happily ever after, but already in the form of New Russia! ”

Perhaps the most striking was the final, the third, part of the Sunday “Sunday evening”, the one that discussed the initiative of the Luvo deputy about the liability of the union for the fact of the second citizenship. The very phrase “deputy of Lugovoi” is already an important symptom of the country's political and moral unhealthy. And in recent months, “deputy Lugovoi” has become a noticeable factor in political life and a media person, in January he had the 19th media rating among all 450 State Duma deputies, in March-the 37th.

Such media activity is not characteristic of deputies of this type. The former guard of Berezovsky, whom the British police suspect of a deliberate murder of Litvinenko, a former FSB officer who later criticized Putin. There were several dozens of people as Lugovoi, who became deputies for the sake of immunity, but they all behaved in the walls of the parliament quite quietly. And here is such an activity. Lugovoi laws go one after another. Bessing sites of sites. Hello Lugovoi from readers "Hedgehog", "Grani", "Kasparov.ru" and the site of Navalny. An appeal to the prosecutor’s office demanding that Yandex recognize the media, otherwise Lugovoi threatens to amend the media law. Now here is the idea to force everyone to report second citizenship under the threat of criminal prosecution.

Viktor Pininsky and Sergey Nevorov, opponents, human rights activist Valentin Gifter, director of the HSE social policy institute, Sergei Smirnov, and the head of the Migration Foundation, Vyacheslav Provincin, performed on the side of the meadow.

The meadow team took sincerity and directness. The Pinsky deputy, for example, said so directly: "People with dual citizenship are at risk." By this, the Pinsky deputy has significantly expanded both the medical and sociological meaning of the term “risk group”. It is a pity that he did not specify the likelihood of what diseases and what kind of crimes increase at the time of obtaining dual citizenship, as well as at what stage of this procedure the risk becomes critical.

The dialogue between the deputy Lugov and human rights activist Hafter is indicative. These two types, speech, motor skills represent such complete social types that it was any way to watch. They could be presented 80 or 75 years ago: one as a guard (or a criminal, types of relatives), the second in the role of an “enemy of the people”.

Then the dialogue would be different, but now it is indicative:

Lugovoi: Dear liberals, who has more liberal legislation, with us or the USA?

Gifter: We have good liberal legislation, and we do not want you to spoil it to us.

Lugovoi: As a result of this liberalism, we have lost the country, and now we are losing Ukraine!

In the camp of liberals - a dumb scene.

Attempts by Lugovoi opponents to explain that the law is pointless to struggle to ensure national security, but creates problems by millions of people in the territory of the former USSR, were seemed to be said in a language inaccessible to the deputies of the State Duma, and most importantly, they are said by people socially unsuccessful.

Recently, the state media have become a tribune for a large number of people with frankly criminal language, behavioral and value attitudes. And this is a fairly stable trend that is clearly not accidental and has specific goals.

The high efficiency of Putin's propaganda is also in its layering. Stalin used "socially close" criminals to suppress political in the Gulag. But he never gave them a media stand. The bottom of the society was, perhaps, socially close, but its representatives were not officially included in the "elite" and did not become media persons.

The party of Mr. J. is the political representation of the Lumpen bottom of Russian society. In the 90s, they somehow put up with this, but holding his nose and keeping a distance. Gaidar publicly called them a "party of villains." Today, these “socially close ones” have actually become the second in media activity by the party in power and, using all the power of state propaganda, carry their “values” to the masses. Thus creating a duet with the Kremlin propaganda, singing it with a “second criminal voice”, the Lumpen bottom party undoubtedly increases the total propaganda effect. But the consequences of the long -term effect of poisoned public consciousness, I believe, is not represented by any of the participants in this duet.