Disagreements stylistic

Something rarely I have been writing about the funny names of stores, about funny children's phrases ... more and more about judicial pearls and other unpleasant incidents. It will be necessary to improve from the New Year.

And on the other hand - what to do? They come from all sides!

Here they saw extremism in the two -volume monograph "International Tribunal for Chechnya" edited by Stanislav Dmitrievsky. The book contains materials about crimes “committed by the parties to the conflict”, they are given their assessment from the point of view of international criminal law. Extremism, as it is now fashionable, is proved using a linguistic examination. The scan was sent to me - I read it, smiled. For example, here is the proof of extremism: “Endless links to the used literature, legislative documents ...” Well, not to mention everything else, it cannot be in a scientific analysis of the emotional and amplifying word endless ! So, having climbed to the last page, I found that I knew one of the authors of this masterpiece examination. This is the odious personality of Larisa Teslenko - the one that has seen "inciting" in writing the word Putinsky In combination, Putin's regime With a small letter (I remind you, it is this spelling that is required by the rules). Here I wrote about her: www.stengazeta.net/article.html?article=4520

It would seem that after a shameful scene in court, when the “expert” found a weak acquaintance with spelling norms, she would have to be silent in a rag - so no, all the God of God: “Endless links to the literature used, legislative documents ...” At that time, by the way, also Dmitrievsky. Maybe this Teslenko has something personal to him? It is not clear why to call this nonsense of linguistic Expertise.

And then recently we were pleased with the Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev: after an interview with five television journalists on December 7, he called the goats Investigators in the "Swamp case" who came with a search to director Pavel Kostomarov at seven in the morning. The video recording of the conversation was published by Russia Today. There was a big scandal, the SK was, to put it mildly, dissatisfied. It is interesting that there is a purely stylistic conflict in front of us. The fact is that the word goat (as a swearing) - a very difficult word. He has two use modes - so to speak, harmless and offensive. Harmless goats Children swear at school, young ladies, students. But for a person associated with the culture of the zone and camp, a goat is deadly. No wonder the expression appeared for Goat Answer . Medvedev, apparently, said in his hearts as students say - in a good way that is. Just scolded the investigators. But for men from SK, this word, I am afraid, does not sound so: they somehow are closer to the criminal world. And what should they do now? I think that they will not forget this humiliation Medvedev.

A similar case of the conflict of cultural codes is described in the old novel by A. Marinina “The Killer Involuntarily”:

- We'll have to Apologize , Artem . "Goats" on zone "Analy" called .

- Whom called ? - Not Understood Reznikov .

- Those​ Forcibly "Lipped . " IN Meaning raped . This Very Serious​ insult . Surik Now must or agree if​ This True , either wash off Resentment blood . Third Not Given . You the same Not Do you want He blood to Kazal that​ You Not right , right ? Yours , between other blood , business​ Yasil​ Erokhin , chewing shashlik And Putting pushing plate .

- Well And Parts u you , - shook head Artem , slightly Having grimaced From pain V burnt hand . - But Here the same Not zone All the same ...

- Here Exactly , - nodded Igor . - That's why Surik ready take off Conflict if you​ all only Sorry .

He returned Surik , silently Put before Igor folded leaf Papers So​ the same Silently He sat down on Own place , expectantly Looking on Reznikova your own clear​ eyes .

- Sorry , Suren Shalikoevich , - conciliatory said Artem . - I He said this By Stupid , without Evil intent , offend you Not I wanted to . Igor to me explain Nile that​ I applied you terrible insult , and I I take it their words back . Again​ Please Forgiveness .

And then President Vladimir Putin in his annual message informed us of what our problem was. She turns out to be deficiency spiritual clip .

These scrapers They brought people, at least to some extent endowed with a sense of style, in perfect delight. The people immediately began to find out the sources of this combination. Olga Romanova remembered: how would Great Neither was Love connecting​ two Paul , how would many heart And spiritual clip Neither binding of lo their between By you , similar the same Scrapers CO All team should be ... A. Kollontai. The road winged Eros! (Letter to the working youth)

And yet, no matter how fun it is to assume that Putin's spiritual Scrapers Late Revelations about the free love of the Milest A.M. Kollontai, a simple search shows that more likely sources here are philosophers Berdyaev and Ilyin. Moreover, Ilyina Putin generally likes to refer. Maybe this is not a direct source, but through the articles of some patriotically thinking researchers who seek the national idea. It turns out that this good (in the sense of articles about paper clips - pah, scrapers ) is full in recent years.

Could play their role and the speech of Patriarch Kirill, for example : we [ PC ] spiritual Screening And warp that civilizations , which only And Maybe​ on equal speak With The world . http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/707283.html

Here is what is interesting. Well, we read, we, for example: and to him "Fighting" from that​​ He I felt myself "V scrape " , first of the " all people praying here​ And Orthodox " , a secondly , and​​ The main thing "V scraper With Church . " [IN. V. Rozanov. Berdyaev about the religious searches of D.S. Merezhkovsky (1916)]. Well in scraper and in scraper . Nothing like that.

But when they broadcast the same mouth about spiritual scrapers that they invited to boil with a club on the head, they called not to chew the snot, yes, they promised to wet in the toilet - but what is there, everyone remembers, this is a little that ... stylistic dynamic. By the way, during the last press conference, Putin several times touched his favorite topic of excrement (confusing, however, the words consistency and substance). No, I do not think that the speaker should not turn to different stylistic layers. But this is a difficult thing - to make sure that it turns out organically. The language is merciless to falsehood. For this, in particular, we (the language, of course, and not the president) are loved.