Maxim Kargapoltsev-Wallen
In Chelyabinsk, in boarding school number 13 for children with disabilities, a 14-year-old boy Maxim Kargapoltsev lives.
On his VKontakte page, the boy calls himself Maxim Kargapoltsev-Uollen. In the photo, he, along with his parents, Wallennes who want to adopt him, and a little below the wishes of the boy: to meet the next Christmas “here”. “Here” is not just the USA, it is Googkart, on it is the Walllen house in the American outback.
A boy with physical pathology and a rare and happy case - a high level of intelligence, clearly compensating for this pathology. Judging by his records, Maxim is a deep, smart and very vulnerable teenager: “Yes, I have many drawbacks. Forgive me, ideal people. " “If you step on the same rake for the third time, then the campaign is these rakes - your fate.” "I thought that friends are losing in quarrels, and they simply dissolve over time." “An apology does not mean that you are wrong, and the other person is right. This just means that the value of your relationship is more important than your own ego. ”
Record December 29: “Impossible is Possible”. Record on December 30, two days after the adoption of the “anti -magnetic law”: “Everything/all on x@th” went. There is no more swearing anywhere.
Only two records relate to the outside world. One is about the adoption of the “anti -Magnitic law”, the other is condolences by executed American children. In English, which is simply remarkable for a 14-year-old orphanage from Chelyabinsk.
That is, a boy with a soul with Wallennes and in the USA. Moreover, here he loses little. Two years ago, boarding school number 13 was the subject of the complaint: the Commissioner for the Rights of the Child in the Chelyabinsk Region Margarita Pavlova wrote to Pavel Astakhova that the director of the boarding school passes the children who dare to him - or it seemed that they were drew in a psychiatric hospital, where they are plying, which was prolonged with potent drugs, in fact, turning into vegetables. See “Flying over the cuckoo’s nest” Ken Kizi. The investigation of Astakhov, of course, ended in nothing.
And in this orphanage (or hell - to someone is more convenient), smart, developed, vulnerable Maxim Kargapoltsev, who wants to his parents in the United States, has grown.
After the adoption of the "Orphan Law", the Chelyabinsk first regional channel comes to it.
And it takes off the plot that has now been removed from everywhere, but the transcript of which can be found in Kesh Google. The plot says:
“Parenek ... turned to Vladimir Putin with a request not to sign the document.
- I will be very grateful if everything turns out in favor of children whom they want to adopt families in the United States. I beg the State Duma and Vladimir Vladimirovich so that he would allow adoption. Let it all be under tight control, but you can not deprive children of the opportunity to find a family, ” Maxim shared.
So, attention. Nowhere in the plot sounds the word "letter". The direct speech of Maxim and the direct speech of the Commissioner for the Rights of the Child in the field of Margarita Pavlova sounds.
After that, the portal http://chelyabinsk.ru/text/newsline/607777.html posts a short note, which says: "A 14-year-old orphan Maxim Kargapoltsev appealed to Russian President Vladimir Putin with a request to allow the family from the United States to adopt it."
Again, let's pay attention: the text does not say that the boy wrote a letter. It is stated completely adequately - he turned.
Maxim hangs a link to this text and another , similar, in VKontakte, and he is clearly satisfied.
On January 9, Komsomolskaya Pravda in Chelyabinsk prints the article by Inna Kumayko, which begins like this:
“ For the 14-year-old Chelyabinsk orphan, Maxim Kargapoltsev,“ The Law of Dima Yakovlev, ”adopted recently by the State Duma deputies, became the collapse of his dreams .”
The article, written from the words of the Commissioner for the Rights of the Child, Margarita Pavlova, is designed in the usual style for the “Komsomol”: True in content, snot in shape and contains several gross errors, including the assertion that the Walllenes communicate with the boy of 7 years old, as well as the words that “ Maxim Kargapoltsev made a letter to the president of Vladimir Putin Putin Putin and State Duma deputies . "
So, here is the primary source of error. Here is a mysterious saboteur, a PR man hired by a bloody State Department, who is looking for firefighters, looking for a police, looking for Astakhs and Lakhov and cannot find, although he is in three clicks with a mouse.
Inna Kumeiko was mistaken. Maxim did not write to Putin. Dot. Let us pay attention - this is precisely a mistake. Kumeiko did not write an appeal to the president for Kargapoltsev. “KP” is the publication loyal to the authorities, and Pavlov is an official.
After that, the Chelyabinsk freelance correspondent of Radio Liberty, Alexander Valiev, hangs another tiny note on the Svoboda website, in which he retells the article “Komsomolskaya Pravda” and also writes that “ Maxim wrote to the deputies and the president .” After that, the news is scattered through the information agencies. As a “quote” from a letter from Kargapoltsev, sometimes his phrase from an interview with the Chelyabinsk television channel appears.
I draw your attention to the fact that at this stage the emerging scandal could be corrected with two mouse clicks and one statement: yes, Maxim Kargapoltsev wanted to leave for the USA and asked Putin about it, but not on a letter, but on the air of the Chelyabinsk Canal, when he was asked what he would ask Putin.
Instead, Ms. Ekaterina Lakhova declares: “ It is clear that the boy did this not without the help of adults. To provoke a child on this, I just wonder how it is possible. This is only with the help of adults all this is done. ”
From the statement of Ekaterina-U-U-Nas-Nas-Problem-S-Medical Lakhova it follows that there is a letter, but the child did not write it himself.
In other words, Ms. Lakhova, State Duma deputy, at the disposal of which there is her apparatus, police, prosecutor's office, assistants, demonstrated total security. Obviously not seeing the text of the letter - otherwise she would have understood in two clicks of mouse that it did not exist, Lakhova said that there was a letter, but this is a provocation. Among other things, in her statement there is amazing confidence in the total moronism of the pupils of Russian orphanages. I have not read, but I will say. Mrs. Lakhova did not see letters, but I am sure that children in our orphanages cannot write otherwise than "with the help of adults."
Following this, Pavel Astakhov - the one who did not find crime in the activities of the director of the orphanage who sent him the children to the psychiatric hospital - triumphantly reports on Twitter:
“ After checking the“ appeal of a patient of an orphan ”from the Chelyabinsk boarding school, it turned out that it was a fake. Unscrupulous speculation. "
From the statement of Mr. Astakhov-let-ryt-i-i-river it follows that there is a letter, but this is a fake.
Astakhov’s statement also testifies to his total security, even in the licking of the Kremlin cannibals. From this statement it follows that if Mr. Astakhov and his entire huge device at least moved a finger and spent ten minutes on the Internet, then they would have learned that there was an error. The primary source of the error is “Komsomolskaya Pravda”. The guy in the United States wants, he turned to Putin, but did not write letters.
Astakhov did not even bother to read the “letter”, because if he demanded to bring the text from his apparatus, it would immediately find out that there was no text. Instead, Astakhov, who did not read the text, said that he is, but this is a fake.
Here I draw the attention of the Kremlin cannibals. People who pushed them into information shit, and the primary sources of the intentional lies about the “letter” are Yekaterina-U-Nas-Vse-Bi-Sort-Medical Lakhov and Pavel Astakhov.
The journalist of Komsomolka did not fake letters, did not quote - she was just mistaken. Two people who deliberately lied, saying that there is a letter, but a) it was not written by Maxim, b) it was written by him at the direction of Lakhov and Astakhov.
Well, and the Kremlin added when he said that "we did not receive letters." I would love to say that this whole story testifies to the unprofessionalism of journalists, if, first of all, it did not testify to the unprofessionalism of the Kremlin Newsmakers, of which the statements followed, yes, they read it, studied it, checked - but this is a fake.
What happened next? After Lakhova and Astakhov, instead of spending ten minutes on the Internet, set up the Kremlin in full, Maxim - a sociable, owning the Internet, who all the time VKontakte, on Facebook, disappeared.
As Maxim was crushed at this time - a smart, developed boy - in an orphanage, where they do not arrange for children to be handed over to a psychiatric hospital - we are unlikely to find out, but, note that Maxim did not succumb.
Still, I had to present him, and he said exactly what was really.
“ The journalist asked me one thing: if you had the opportunity to turn to Putin, what would you tell him? I replied: I would ask him to let me go to America. And all. I did not write any letter, I did not compose any petitions. I do not consider myself a wretched orphan, I am able to solve my problems myself . "
And he added: " I will still leave for America ."
This is “I do not consider myself a wretched orphan” and “I will go to America anyway” is expensive.
Maxim generally the boy is not only smart, but also strong -willed.
There is a shooting of the “Time” program of four years ago: journalists came to this very orphanage and ask the children who wants to do what. Pithers Maxim reply: “Chocolate”, “Sneakers”, and Maxim says: “And I want to become an oligarch. Or president. " Why? "And then I will publish the law so that no one would drink and smoke." Such Chelyabinsk Anakin Skywalker.
Mil and Diana Wallenna first arrived in the orphanage 7 years ago, but not as adoptive parents, but simply with gifts in the delegation of Christian-methodologists. They want to adopt Maxim since 2011, but an unspoken ban on adoption in the United States has been in force in the region. For two years they shook their souls for two years and explained each time that they brought the wrong piece of paper.
And yet. Pavel Astakhov wears the formal title of defender of the rights of children, as in Orwell, the Ministry of War was called the Ministry of the World. What should the defender of the child do, having learned that Maxim has a family, that Mil and Diana Wallenna consider him his son, and he is his parents, that Maxim dreams of leaving his parents, asks the Russian president about it, but the Chelyabinsk gloomers do everything to break this family? In the 17th century, the slave traders torn families at least for profit, and these are just like that, from cretinism and sadism.
Probably, the defender of the children should say: I will do everything to reunite my son and parents. What did Astakhov say? "Provocation" and "Americans themselves are to blame."
The only one of the adults is sincere in this story is deputy Sergei Weinstein, who took patronage over Maxim and promised, by the way, to send to the United States. Uralets Winstein is one of the richest deputies of the State Duma, and to think that he did it for the sake of PR is simply indecent. And yet, I have the feeling that Maxim Kargapoltsev will not be lost. This boy may have psychological problems, like all graduates of Russian orphanages, but he has a clear mind and strong will.