
There is such a saying - God in the details ... And these details sometimes speak no less than the global characteristics and assessments of certain actions. Here, let me introduce you to some events of the last time. The scandal ended in an attempt by France Ambassador in Georgia to find out how the Russian troops were withdrawn. Russian peacekeepers detained a diplomat and did not let him further than their checkpoint. The Russian Foreign Ministry did not find anything reprehensible in this incident, and in the General Staff they assure that in this way they saved the life of the ambassador in the conflict zone. The Ambassador of France to Georgia Eric Fournier on Thursday was temporarily deprived of diplomatic immunity - the soldiers of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation for obscure reasons detained a diplomat, despite his status. Russian troops blocked his path to the bridge near the city of Gori and did not let go for three hours. The Russian side has already put a lot of explanations to the incident. Sometimes the explanations are contradictory, but united by one - they were all given "on a blue eye."
The second story - according to chronology, it is the first - about how the lips of the Minister of Foreign Affairs Lavrov, the ambassador of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation on special assignments of Churkin and the permanent representative of Russia in NATO Rogozin were voiced that Saakashvili was not the person with whom the negotiations can be held. And earlier, Kondoliza Rais was publicized by Lavrov’s words that Saakashvili should leave.
The third story is about how the President of Chechnya Kadyrov called home from London Ahmed Zakayev. Like, the place of the talented artist is not in London, where they are manipulated, but in the theater, and it is already waiting for him. And it's okay that in Russia in different years 4 criminal cases were instituted against Zakayev. In particular, he is accused in absentia of armed rebellion, organizing illegal armed groups and an encroachment on the life of a law enforcement officer. Zakaev also passes the accused in the case of a terrorist attack in the theater center at Dubrovka in October 2002, and in the summer of 2006 the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation opened a criminal case against him under Article 282 of Part 2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (arousal of hatred in relation to a group of persons according to the grounds of nationality, language and origin, committed using the media and the threat of violence). Do you think Kadyrov simply agreed that all the accusations from Zakayev would be removed or is it about Lisonka, who is deaf and asks Kolobok to sing her song, sitting on her nose?
The fourth story is about how the popular Russian President Medvedev signed the first decrees on the assignment of Russian citizenship. The list of new citizens of Russia has the Moldavian criminal authority of the Bulgarian. And there is no journalist Natalya Morar, who, as you recall, is a threat to Russia's security. Of course, the criminal authority accused on the territory of his own country of creating a criminal community engaged in extortion, robberies, banditry and thefts on a large large size - this is just the citizen who is absolutely necessary for today's Russia. Obviously, that the law should be respected. And no one will give any explanation to anyone. Who are you, in fact, such that you give you explanations? Voters, say? So you have already chosen your own. Now the favorites will do what he considers necessary. By the way, the above authority was already delayed in Kyiv and was released by one of the prosecutors, later the Ukrainian authorities opened a criminal case against the prosecutor himself. Probably, the prosecutor fucked something from the liberation of the Bulgarian. How do you think? And what did the one whose signature under decree have got? Oh, it’s even scary to think ... And why, in fact, I should be scared, because none of the authorities worked out and the word to say why criminal authority is more necessary for the country than a journalist who speaks the truth. So I am making my own assumptions.
And, finally, the good reasons for refusing the parole Mikhail Khodorkovsky. In conclusion, he did not receive a specialty, understand? That is, having created the largest corporation, which he successfully led, he did not learn to sew mittens. After all, no one argued with the fact that the corporation is successful. This is called - special cynicism. And we must swallow this cartoon. That is, a replicated phrase about who should sit in prison, ultimately acquires the subject - Khodorkovsky. In any situation.
It turns out that when the Russian leadership acts on the already mentioned “blue eye” and gives not very intelligible explanations, the following actions may be the answer: informing the general public about what happened; The note of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the country, the representative of which was in lawlessness; The refusal of the person who is abroad to do what he is called to. We can find out about all this from sources of information that is not subject to Kremlin censorship.
And when it comes to the internal space, then everyone agrees, since disagreement can be expressed only in your blog, which is already unsafe - see the example of Savva Terentyev. And you can get together in the kitchen. And all. Everything else falls under the laws on an administrative offense, extremism and other laws that provide our author with the confidence that Russian citizens are “succeeding and so” ... And they are hacking.