In society

Debutant

August 6, 2012 Viktor Shenderovich

In the newspaper "Tomorrow" published "Letter to Comrade Stalin." The pathos of the letter is fully consistent with the place of publication, and one could, without turning around, pass by, if not for the name of the author.

"Letter" was written by Zakhar Prilepin.

So I read it. And with sadness I state: Zakhar became an anti -Semite, which, in fact, notified the public by the publication of this text. Before that, Prilepin was listed in the “left”, up to the acute Limon phase - and many, including me, wrote it off to nostalgia for the Soviet children's clarity of the world, to the protracted youth. They thought it would grow up - it will get angry ...

Matured, arrived.

As a person of left -wing beliefs, it can be an anti -Semite - you can’t explain Sartre with Camus, but Russia has a special way. Prilepin, of course, is not the first to decide to combine a sickle and a hammer with annuality - otherwise we did not see the secretaries of the regional committees with this diagnosis!

Alas, in order to move the brains on the Jewish theme, it is not at all necessary to be a shopkeeper or secretary of the regional committee - this rubbish sometimes settles in the most subtle organisms ... We must constantly monitor yourself and protect yourself. Anti -Semitism is a type of syphilis, and syphilis picked up geniuses ...

In a neglected form, however, this disease equally turns into the ruin of both genius and boob.

In the case we described, there are funny details (if in the syphilis in principle there can be something funny). For example, our tactful debutant-anti-Semite avoids the words "Jews". Fulfilling a new legend of the Underlover for himself, the writer tries to look elegant - and that would be funny when it would not be so disgusting ...

The epigraph from Slutsky does not save - in the second step of Prilepin, he takes away the country to the standard repertoire of the newspaper Tomorrow: Great Great, the Democrats destroyed the country, then everywhere, up to the obligatory Jewish theme. This repertoire obliges the typical abominations and forgery, and the text is teeming with them, starting from the first package.

But it makes no sense to argue with people who have continued a nest decade to tape the mantra about Soch and a nuclear bomb; They do not want to see either numbers or documents testifying to the disaster, which turned out to be the Stalinist stretch of the veins for Russia. All this, I repeat, are quite ordinary for the newspaper Tomorrow and its clientele.

However, there is, however, in the “letter” for a subtle, the honor of the invention of which completely belongs to Zakhar Prilepin himself. This is the evil “we” used by him as the key to the text.

Who are they, these disgusting "we", on behalf of which Prilepin wrote his "letter to Stalin"? See the text in the text: those who divided the country created by the leader, counted the enterprises he built, stole billions, took the money for the cordon, built thousands of palaces there, bought yachts ... Well, in general terms, it is clear, but is it possible more than more?

And here are more specific to you: these are those ungrateful people with a “town consciousness”, “whose grandfathers and great -grandfathers would have changed their minds in gas chambers”, if not for Stalin. Those whose seed saved Stalin, “putting in seven layers of Russian people” ... in a word ... Well, you understand.

Understood, brought. Not stupid.

Ah, Zakhar, only what does the “Russian liberal community” have to do with it, how did you named us in a false signature under the letter? Why are these bashful euphemisms? No need to be shy, Zakhar, all of their own, especially in the newspaper "Tomorrow". Tell me simply and loudly: Jews! - And the new masses of excited readers will reach for you. The old ones, however, are withdrawn, but the circulation will not fall.

Zakhar - is shy (so far), and this understandable shyness forms a semantic gap into which the remains of logic fail.

For if it is about the fact that Jews are to blame for all the troubles of Russia, then Prilepin was late with this opening of two hundred years, the clearing is busy, and do not take bread from the editor -in -chief. (Not to mention Valentin Rasputin, who was larger, and was infected earlier, and together with the brothers in mind, he chased foreigners in the hut of banners when Prilepin walked under the table.)

If we are talking about the fact that the liberals destroyed Russia is also not a new thought, and why not discuss it with those who have lost the memory of the queues for Canadian bread at the end of the “scoop” ... Only what does it have to do with it, the saved seed and gas chambers?

Comrade Prilepin! You still specify, at least for yourself: do you not like the economist Urinson-or the Chicago Economic School? You are checkers - or go? You are annoyed by the Abramovich yacht - or his own nose? Deripaska is a Jew? Kobzon - liberal? My dad withdrew capital from Russia? Ulitskaya bankrupt the Red Bogatyr plant? Excuse me what I say with questions - such a nation ...

Everything was mixed in the Oblonsky house, and everything was sticking together in the head of Prilepin: the empire and the Fatherland, Limonov and Gagarin, the holy socialist idea and pharaoh Koba, liberalism and theft, estate and flood, ethnic and ideological - all in a bunch!

The heap turned out to be not small, and the love of the homeland covered with his head the dislike of the Jews.

Feelings, of course, are traditionally close, but we must distinguish.

Photo by RIA Novosti