The wormhole of the Russian path

The main event of the week, of course, was the march of mothers, that is, mothers of detained girls in the case of "New Greatness". Or wet march, as he was still called due to heavy rain. However, the weight of the event was given a clash of two antagonistic public groups, mutually excited by hatred in relation to each other. And several philosophy at the exit.

The fears of one of the groups were perfectly spoke in by the Pro-Putin-Protrampov publicist Petr Akopov. Here is what he wrote on his Facebook page: “ If it turns out that the design of the“ new greatness ”was actively facilitated by the special services (and this, one might say, turned out for a long time. - S.M.), this will be used in every possible way against us - not against the authorities, but against us all.” Thus, it seems to me, Akopov identified himself and his associates with provocateurs and police officers. A little, however, mysterious: but how to use the march against them? Obviously, having rewritten the personal data of “all of us” to the leaflet, and then subjecting them to lustration, when the pendulum of the regime sways in the other direction.

As for philosophy, they are placed in the range from “this is our victory” to “no, no victory”. And - from "it is necessary to resolutely resist the dictatorship" to "a reasonable compromise is needed, instead of an irreconcilable opposition, a moral imperative."

The fact is that I also think that the magnificent and touching marks with children's toys, although I led to the liberation of two girls from a Chekist shock, in no case can be considered a victory of society over a repressive machine. Firstly, because the boys still stayed in prison. And secondly, because the authorities again showed that it has various buttons. Click one of them - and the whole power of the police apparatus will fall upon you. Click the other - and the same Duboloma Urfin Jus, who used to beat batons, will now smile and translate across the road with your protest.

Rather, this is the development of a conditional reflex in a monkey with a banana: which button to press in order to get a banana. Even Leo Tolstoy said about all this: “These people achieve different freedoms for citizens of the Russian state, imagining that this is the goal of a revolution. But the goal and the last result of the revolution is much further than the one that the revolutionaries see. This goal is the liberation from state violence. ” Nepig - violence where it was, remained there.

The writer Dmitry Bykov described a kind of path to the true Russian liberation, paving him through “absolute humility” through “substitute the second cheek”. In fact, he suggested the original strategy - to finish the bandits not with exposure and barricades, but tolerance, appealing to Christian values ​​and kneeling.

Like, if they see how people crawl to them on their knees with toys, all in snot, with requests to be kinder - and so that there are all sorts of pregnant crying women (I must say that this is a really terrible sight, such as a mental attack from the Vasilyev brothers), they will be unsuccessfully, or maybe even recover.

Igor Yakovenko, as we know, ironically reacted to Bykov’s proposal, but, by mature reflection, I cannot but note the involuntary insight of the writer. The fact is that in our head we keep a description of reality surrounding us under the conditional heading “Modern Minus 1”. That is, modern, with the Internet, a half -fish, parties and opposition, but also with a certain wormhole in the form of irremovable Putin and rich like Sechin. However, if you remove the wormhole, then there will be a "modern", like everyone else.

Bykov, it seems to me, suggests keeping in mind a more realistic description: “Modern Minus 100” or, perhaps, “Modern minus 200”. To push our perception to an even deeper archaic - with kings, nobles, feudal lords, higher and lower classes, but from which the “Russian path” will be highlighted definitely. And you won’t make a mistake where.

First, Christian humility, banners, petitions. Then the bloody Sunday, and then ... Well, you yourself know ... In general, there is a chance to come to normal capitalism.

In February 1917, it all started with women, George Satarov melancholy noted these days melancholy

***

The “wormhole”, however, should be talked about especially, and this topic, again in connection with the march of mothers, surfaced repeatedly. It all started with the fact that the “thinking class” began to be permanently puzzled: so the promised terror began or did not begin and what is the role of Putin directly in it?

I must say that by many signs it still began. Not total, but painful and growing. For the accusations are becoming more absurd, and landing is becoming denser.

This was convincingly wrote these days, in particular, Vladimir Pastukhov. In the article "Why can't Putin regret Anya Pavlikova?" He suggested that “Putin has put into effect such powerful forces and motives that he himself is not able to control,” that is, he lost the levers. Although, I admit, it turned out just the opposite. As if hearing Pastukhov, Putin specifically regretted Pavlikov, that is, he managed with levers.

Nevertheless, many others began to be inclined to the same thought, exciting Putin. In his notes, united by the hashtag #Leviathanushka (a hint of the underfloority of our Leviathan or, better to say, his infantility, underplancing), the former adviser to the leader Gleb Pavlovsky introduces Putin a certain log swimming along the river. Why it turns out that it is not he who is to blame, they say, they say, the river is to blame, and there is nothing to judge Putin. And in the article “Big Error”, published under the brand of the Moscow Center of Carnegie, which recently reminds me of something like the house of pioneers with its innocence, the idea that the original plan of the Russian authorities, in general, was good, and the impersonal systemic failure crept. Not Putin, but a failure.

“The affairs against pseudo -ethnic extremists are not a new large terror, but a systemic failure,” says the author of Pertov, “the unforeseen consequences of poorly thought -out decisions. Anti -exploration laws were conceived as subtle instruments to intimidate individual disagreements. But in the conditions of the Russian power system with its stick reporting, the program failed and began to generate self -destructive errors. ”

There is no need to emphasize once again that what Pepperov wrote in this case is non -urban stupidity. The Putin elite has long turned into a closed estate, which spends all his strength on preventing the penetration of strangers into it, especially democrats and liberals, and just good people. And therefore, there is certainly no self -destructive error in the corps of repressive laws and practices, since everything was so conceived from the very beginning. Another thing is that we do not know what this will lead to in the future and how the current Putin is correlated with this. He still crossed the systems or lost the levers and sails a riveted log along the river, with longing (not very noticeable.-S.M.), looking right from the wedding of Karin Knaisl , behind the action of “powerful forces” '' ''.

Type, drank, bit, dancing with the bride and - looks.

However, it seems to me all this with a strong exaggeration. Or the need for the role of the person. Remove Putin (Stalin, Erdogan, Assad, Trump), and most often it turns out that all these “powerful forces” disappear along with Laurum and Shoigu. After all, we are also sailing in this river, which, as a rule, brings everyone in one direction - to more effective forms of creative being. As for Putin, sooner or later he will lag behind, so his biological clock works. And sooner or later he will cease to restrain the dam of accumulated changes. A breakthrough will occur, the so -called destructive creation. Although at the time of “destruction”, we agree, it may not be very bad and unpleasant.

We can only evaluate the moment - it will happen on time or in time. Or that, alas, it is very late.


Photo: 1. Russia. Moscow. 08/15/2018. During the "Mother of Mothers" in support of the defendants in the case of the "new greatness" on Nikitsky Boulevard. Mikhail Tereshchenko/TASS
2. Russia. Moscow. 08/15/2018. During the "Mother of Mothers" in support of the defendants in the case of the "new greatness" on Nikitsky Boulevard. Maria Olendskaya/Hedgehog
3. Russia. Moscow. 08/15/2018. During the "Mother of Mothers" in support of the defendants in the case of the "new greatness" on Nikitsky Boulevard. Vasily Petrov