"Twelve." July 24. Transcript

On July 24, in the Moscow City Court, in the framework of the so -called “case of twelve (allocated from the“ swamp business ”), the video evidence submitted by the prosecution continued.

The head of the Moscow Helsinki group Lyudmila Alekseev, actress Liya Akhedzhakov, the leader of the movement in defense of the Khimki forest, Yevgeny Chirikov, came to support the defendants.

Leah Akhedzhakova is outraged by the delay in the meeting for an hour. “Such disrespect for people. We are suffocating here. ”

Viewing the video "Minaev-Live" on May 6, 2012 continues.

At the end of viewing, a break for 35 minutes was announced.

After a break.

Judge: Are there any statements on the viewed material evidence? The assessment is now unacceptable.

Vladimir Akimenkov: Obscene vocabulary is contained.

Judge: This is not on the case.

Sergey Krivova: We do not know the dates of the creation of files.

Judge: Not essentially. Sit down.

Lawyer of Maria Baronova Sergey Badamshin: There is no time scale in the video. We cannot evaluate what is happening on the screen. This file has nothing to do with the protocol. The video chain limits the passage so that the testimony of Danichenko (on May 6, 2012, police colonel Dmitry Deanichenko was the deputy head of the public order of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Moscow) are refuted. Minaev’s offspring text says that he knew about events in advance. And he was not questioned. Mentions events to their origin. The question of synchron is obvious when it comes to fires that someone threw-when? It can be seen that the rallies fenced themselves with bars. The beaten police officers have not been noted anywhere in the protocol. Obviously, many persons who were supposed to be questioned were not questioned.

Lawyer of Alexandra Dukhanina and Denis Lutskevich Dmitry Dubrovin: There are breaks in the video. There is no binding. A video of the swamp is given by fragments, it is impossible to establish a sequence. The content of the video does not correspond to the inspection protocol. Demonstrators before applying violence to them behaved calmly.

Lawyer Leonid Kovyazin Vladimir Samarin: Everything was blocked by the chain. It can be seen that people had nowhere to go. We saw people who the police beat for nothing.

Kryva: The only Minaev camera was installed not by the stage, but at the gathering from the small stone bridge. Even before the demonstration on the bridge, people roam, it is not clear whether they have passed the check through the frames. Central stations are closed to the exit. The chain consisted of riot police and military personnel mixed up. It can be seen that the passage remained insignificant. The first organized column could no longer pass. Minaev says about Navalny that he asks to open the area completely. That a breakthrough is planned is clear only from the words of Minaev. Half an hour after people got on the asphalt, Minaev says that they would lead the case to Udaltsov. Minaev knew everything. He said that the breakthrough attempt began, and nothing is visible. It can be seen that people stop after a breakthrough. The gap of the chain, then the detention is the first, second, then the chain was restored, and only then the bottle with incendiary mixture flew. The bottles flew after the vintage and blows of batons. It can be seen that it is primary, which is secondary. After restoring the chain, there were no repeated breakthroughs. The crowd was pressed and reduced its volume. People do not take any illegal actions. It can be seen that people are facing a riot police, riot police come up, wring their hands and drag. There was no appeal to the citizens, why it was necessary to disperse. Wave -like events. As soon as everything calms down, the police come out and begins in a new one. Blows with batons through barriers are clearly visible. Only two fallen toilet is visible. Why is it talking about six? The rest stood. In the video, the defendants or other persons who are named in the protocol were not identified. Personally, I did not see a single token on the police. At the end there were actions on the other side of the embankment. On what basis?

Badamshin: The guide chain with a sedentary strike took a step forward. Yellow toilets were not the subject of a ram of police officers, as Deanichenko said.

Lawyer of Vladimir Akimenkov and Yaroslav Belousov Dmitry Agranovsky: The evidence -based value of viewing is close to zero.

Defender of Maria Baronova Lev Ponomarev: There was no aggression. In the first contact of the crowd with the police, this was without aggression. The police were just pushed away. The rest went to another scenario. The police were abruptly introduced into the crowd, grabbed citizens, which caused opposition.

Dubrovin: Cabinets were only for fencing from aggressive actions of the police. The destruction of property, arson, armed opposition is not visible on the film.

Defender of Alexandra Dukhanina Dmitry Berko: The time of creating the file is not indicated.

Judge: Strive, this is not essentially.

Defender Sergei Krivov Sergey Mokhnatkin: The origin of this video is incomprehensible.

Judge: This is not essentially.

Lawyer Sergei Krivov Vyacheslav Makarov: There are signs of transformation and editing of video evidence. Speech did not coincide with the movement of the lips. A clear mismatch in time and noted actions on the protocol. In the protocol 18:02 - the beginning of the riots. This is not on the film. About special tools. Already used. The police use batons - this is visible. A blow from above. This is on the head, and not in the permitted parts of the body. That is, the illegal actions of the police are recorded. Minaev says that many will then write that the police arranged a massacre. In the credits there is the text “Swamp Square”, which does not correspond to the fact that the swamp embankment is shown on the screen. Minaev says that the protesters on the large stone bridge, while they are small. Minaev says that the square is not closed, but the opposite is visible on the frames. Minaev says that Kolokoltsev arrived in Bolotnaya Square (on May 6, 2012, the current Minister of the Interior Vladimir Kolokoltsev headed the Moscow Central Internal Affairs Directorate).

Mokhnatkin: What does this video have to do with our client?

Kryva: Minaev says there were stab wounds. How does he know this while sitting in the studio? We see that a person with a broken head. Minaev does not speak about this. Everything seen happens in the agreed time in a agreed place.

Mokhnatkin: There was not a single civilian on the blocked swamp square.

Makarov: Minaev hopes for vintage with tents.

Dubrovin: In the last hour of video recordings, the police blocked citizens and created a crush on Bolotnaya embankment.

Judge: We look at another file ( gives a disc an employee ). Duration - 38 min.

A demonstration of the video NEVEX.TV begins.

Badamshin: We observe the numerous use of special equipment.

Stepan Zimin’s lawyer Maxim Pashkov: This is a cut, the installation of personnel, it is impossible to establish what, where and when it happened.

Lawyer Andrei Barabanova Svetlana Sidorkina: The description protocol does not correspond to the video file.

Makarov: Time does not correspond. Riot police beat citizens for no reason.

Dubrovin: The video shows more than 60 speakers. There is installation. With sticks, demonstrators beat for no reason. Fences were used to protect against aggressive actions of the police. The policeman beats his face with a fist, a foot on his stomach.

The lawyer of Nikolai Caucasus Vadim Kluvgan: three circumstances without taking into account the quality of the video. First: the actions of the demonstrators were peaceful. Second: the frame shows how a deputy of the State Duma tried to prevent the beating of people. In response from the police, violence was used to him. Third: the only reason for the incident was the disadvantage of people for a rally. There is nothing in the film, which would correspond to Article 212 (“Mass riots”).

Crooked: There is no data on the file. The policeman strikes the lying. The stone flew from the police. I did not see a single token, although the faces of the police were largely visible. Fights are clearly visible from above. The police crawl into the ranks of the demonstrators, beat them with a fist. In response after the raid, items are already flying. They fly in response to the illegal actions of the police.

Judge: Have you seen yourself?

Krivov: No, I could not identify.

The judge asks Alexander Dukhanin . The answer is not.

Livganes: We have not yet moved to the stage of interrogation of the accused. I object to the actions of the chairman.

Ponomarev: People are chanted: "Submit!" At the same time, they stand still, and in the protocol it is written that they are moving forward.

Mokhnatkin: The actions of the police are aggressive. There are no attempts to break through.

Makarov: Everything seen takes place in the place of the agreed rally at the agreed time.

Judge (laughs) : Well, who recognized himself?

Answer: Nobody.

The judge calls the new disk: five video clips of 14 minutes. Viewing is postponed until the next meeting.

Announces a break to Tuesday, July 30, 11.30.