Translated material
The problem is 2010
In my opinion, Julian Assange's lessons are extremely simple. Once the children's writer Dragunsky had a story that the secret always becomes clear. That, in fact, is all. This rule is the same for everyone - for large politicians and their great secrets, for little people and their little secrets. Nothing supernatural. Any recorded information can become vowel. And forgive goodbye, a state secret, a diplomatic secret and a separate deal. Mrs. Latynina formulates Assange's credo as follows: “ No power in the world should be uncontrolled except the power of Julian Assange.” Under the first part of the phrase, I think, any sane person (except for government representatives, naturally) will subscribe. As for the "authorities of Julian Assange" - funny. What power does Assange have? None! It does not mean to embarrass the power of those in power yet to have power. If you want, a manic desire to track what is from him, Assange (and, therefore, from society), hide. And it makes no sense to be angry. We need to think. The fact that any representative of the authorities of any super -agency state is also a person with his weaknesses, that from time to time Monica or Watergates convincingly prove ... that two know, theoretically, anyone can know. And many roads to hell are paved with the good intentions of states or groups of persons ...
If someone is in the sky above us, then he would have to come up with Wikileaks and Assange personally, like a small Last Judgment ... lifetime. Since the darkest pages of history before the invention of the Internet could remain so arbitrarily long. From now on - sorry. Any pencil note can be scanned and posted on public display. And then already decide for yourself: you do not want to see intimate body movements of the power of those in power or vice versa - you want to be able to evaluate the actions of those who are immeasurably more powerful of you. I have the feeling that Assange just sought to find out what the possibilities of a small man against the mass are a mass of human, domineering, administrative and so on. However, I am by no means singing him. He is a little man, which remained in his big game.
I understand perfectly well that whatever documents are published, there will always be those who say: yes we knew this without him.
They knew, but silent? They knew, but could not accompany good evidence? Basta, the little ones jumped. Hypothetically, such a small big brother appears. And this, note, is not an Assange or someone else who can track and pull out any body movement or group of people who make decisions and pull it out by the ear and in the sun. A big brother is those who read Assange's materials. That is, we are with you. Dot. They sailed. Don't you like the power of Tyutkin or Assange? Do you like the possibility of your own control over any power? Then read Wikileaks materials. Again, there are people on the other side of the street who do not care - they call them Batman or Robin ...
Then I thought. Any compromising evidence is poured into the public for some purpose. The main charm of Mr. Assange is that, as I understand it, to support the goals or, conversely, he just did not put someone specific. There is different: look, evaluate what those you have chosen, with whom you are negotiating, are planning joint projects of a planetary scale. Great, gentlemen! Tomorrow, an adequate voter in an adequate election system will tell his potential hero: look with me! It's time to recall the “adequate” voter who voted for Hitler in Germany in the 30s. A minute, but the materials of such a site are available. Including those who observe the process from the outside. Today we are all connected on the globe. The tragic story of September 11 only confirmed this. I believe that in the presence of structures similar to Wikileaks, interested parties will have more opportunities to predict in advance, for example, a prepared terrorist attack or a change in the regime in a particular country, if one can lead to massive extermination of people.
After all, any human-navigable mass action is always prepared for some time. And always requires resources from the outside. Here you have a big brother. Yes, you say, but you’ll get so to the complete transparency of your own Privacy - neither you will rest in your nose, to go to your mistress. And who needs your nose and your mistress, if you do not control someone’s fate? Think for yourself. In my opinion, the whole story of the scandalous Julian is nothing more than a new round of natural selection. Sooner or later, society was supposed to enter this round. Now the task is to decide by what rules to live at this new stage.
In the event of his death, the creator of WikiLeaks warned, the key parts of fire -hazardous documents will be published automatically. Now the world backstage will also have to protect him, as at one time Israel was concerned about the safety of Yasir Arafat from reasons, which is still unknown how much worse his successor ... But do not think that he is arrested to protect him. The arrest of Assange means only one thing - no government wants to control it. And again, there is a confrontation: society is power. They remembered about the rape of obscure origin, as you know, only when Assange needed to stop - under any pretext. A number of American companies cease cooperation with Wikileaks due to violation of the law on rights to published data ... and - hundreds of people create “mirrors”. And - Internet users download the information bomb promised by Assange. And it turns out that the process can only be stopped by direct violence. And what, they will go to him in relation to every network of the English language user? The followers of Assange will find, you can not go to the fortuneteller. And what, for everyone to look for compromising evidence?
Ten years ago, we were scared of the 2000 problem. Today we all encountered the 2010 problem. Apparently, the Assange voiced to one degree or another, published a request from the company to information about the activities of the bureaucracy - any. What next: a positional war or the need for a peace treaty with the most possible mutual sovereignty? At one end of the negotiation table, ordinary people are still, and on the other, people who consider themselves slightly above all that is allowed to a person. And whoever defeats depends on you, readers, listeners, consumers of information ...