In society

Porridge in the head

January 22, 2010 Natella Boltyanskaya

The head of the Kremlin administration, Sergei Naryshkin, held a meeting of the commission to counteract the falsification of history.

According to Naryshkin, a decrease in political passions in some countries around certain moments of our history is not yet felt.

I would like a little more about these "some countries." Is this Poland in which Katyn does not want to forget? Is this Ukraine with its trial against the negative of the Holodomor? In brackets I will note my own opinion about Ukraine and the Holodomor. I do not agree with the concept of the genocide of the Ukrainian people in this matter, since the then power exercised the genocide against the entire people - the Soviet, part of which at that time was Ukrainian. On the other hand, since Ukraine as a sovereign state today cannot evaluate the degree of Stalin’s desire to destroy, say, the Kazakh or Lithuanian people, it speaks of the Ukrainian people. But I will return to "some countries." I have a thought that is not devoid of novelty that in a foggy passage about “some countries” the country is hiding the country's most important country for a Russian citizen. Since we argue with the same Ukraine and say that “the entire Soviet people have suffered,” it is time to give an assessment to these suffering. For example, the destiny of our grandfathers was heavy, but they but their bodies with their bodies to a great future. Or, on the contrary, no great future is worth the way to go through the whole people with his bodies.

So today we are indignant at the PACE resolution, comparing the acts of Stalin and Hitler. And - with the lips of the President of the Russian Federation - we immediately say : “ Let's only think: millions of people died as a result of terror and false accusations - millions. They were deprived of all rights. Even the rights to a worthy human burial, and for many years their names were simply crossed out of history. But you can still hear that these numerous sacrifices were justified by some higher state goals. I am convinced that no development of the country, no successes, ambitions can be achieved at the cost of human grief and losses. Nothing can be placed above the value of human life. And there are no excuses. ”

We restore the inscription in the subway on Kursk-Koltseva, and we are protesting against the fact that it was Stalin who raised us for loyalty to the people. We read the names of the repressed and open the bust of Stalin in Bryansk ... We have a boil of political passions around our own history in our own country. We already have the idea of ​​the great manager and there is a thought (all the same president) " to prevent the justification of the justification of those who destroyed their people under the guise of restoring the historical justice."

The remnants of the former freedom of thought are expressed today, in particular, and the aforementioned boiling of passions. For they do not want to give an assessment of Stalinism. The phenomenon of Stalinism cannot be given assessments in general, the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation said during the “hot line” with the Russians on December 3, 2009.

Well, and what do you want from the people whose heads themselves cannot agree among themselves? True, there is a completely vulnerable idea, they say, today is not arguing supporters and opponents of Stalin, but the descendants of the two branches of this people - the one who sat and died, and the one that planted and destroyed. As statistics show, the executioners also very often subsequently became victims. But this does not justify the executioners ... and does not detract from their suffering as victims ...

The activities of the Commission on Combating Falsification of History are absolutely necessary ... and is absolutely useless. Show me those who argue with the fact that the Soviet Union won in 1945? There are no such even among ardent supporters of the position that the victory was achieved by an unacceptable price. But they do not want to evaluate the inadmissibility of this price, as well as the prices of industrialization. Who, in fact, prevents all branches of the authorities from evaluating the Stalinist period with numbers in their hands? Just evaluate. Not before the comma - "But, nevertheless, it was a great country and a great victory." Who prevents them from raising archives, which not all interested in access to all interested, and name these numbers? Is it belittling the greatness of the country?

You might think that they do not want to give this assessment? It is possible, but I would not think so, for I believe that the main reason is in porridge. Porridge in their heads. For each of them wants a humble people who humbly accepts everything that he gives or does not give them, but each of them, knowing how to read and minimally analyze, wants his own conquests to be protected by a civilized law, and this desire no longer fits into the concept of the existence of someone else's unlimited power. And it turns out that the country does not have a position as such, since the position is expressed by the speaker on duty on duty, taking into account the situation on duty. And any number of those who died just like that, because there was such a time-so any number of victims is not a duty, but still requiring an unambiguous assessment.

Photos of RIA Novosti