Translated material
Salieri and Mozart
In society
Salieri and Mozart
June 20, 2013 Julia Latynina
On June 15, Echo of Moscow conducted a survey: whose position do you support in the conflict of Nikolai Tsiscaridze and the leadership of the Bolshoi Theater? The position of Tsiscaridze by telephone was supported by 93.5% of the calling, the position of Ixanov (director of the large) - 6.5%.
Let me remind you that Nikolai Tsiskaridze, the great dancer, was fired from the Bolshoi Theater last week, and it is natural to remember the soulless administrators, the great talents that they stomp, and the mediocre Salieri, out of envy, who had poisoned Mozart.
The situation in this case, however, is slightly different.
Nikolai Tsiskaridze has repeatedly stated that he wants to become the head of the big. Moreover, on this occasion, a rather noisy PR campaign was deployed, a significant part of which was organized by Tina Kandelaki and its Apostol agency, usually (as it is considered in the political studies) specializing in the Politspam in favor of Pzhiv.
Why Kandelaki? The fact is that Tsiscaridze, according to rumors, has several high -ranking patrons. One is Marianna Sardarova, a secular lady, the wife of an oil industry holding a salon who was very proud of this ballet pearl in her collection, especially since it was Tsiscaridze who brought a bunch of people into this salon. The other is the wife of the head of Rostec Chemezov. ( Ksenia Sobchak wrote that the patron of Tsiscaridze is Chemezov himself, and, indeed, he seemed to go to Putin with a request to appoint a dancer the head of the big one, but, as far as he was considered in a party, the main patron is still a wife.) Let me remind that Tina Kandelaki is connected with a advertising contract with Chemezov (many believe that she was washed out for the grandpan).
The Tsiscaridze campaign began with the dancer's high -profile statements about how largely reconstructed a large one. The network noted that posts on this subject were located through the “Apostle” by Tina Kandelaki.
Then there was a letter with a request to appoint Tsiscaridze the head of Gabt, also, by the way, placed on the blog of Tina Kandelaki. It was signed by the most prominent figures of Russian culture, but then many of them stated that their signatures were fraudulently: they called and said that Iksanov was definitely fired, and there was the only way to save something-to ask Tsiscaridze to appoint instead.
During this campaign, Nikolai Tsiskaridze, the great dancer, said, for example, that "the Bolshoi Theater is me."
Unfortunately, the public campaign for the post of head of the Bolshoi Theater coincided with other, less public and completely criminal cases.
At first there was a Ratmansky, a former art of the Bolshoi Theater, which was pierced by tires until he escaped to America. Then, Gennady Yanina had to be appointed to the post of Khudruk. Then someone opened Yanin’s mail, found gay pornography there, Yanina was not prescribed. Then they appointed Filin - but they spilled with acid in his face.
Here, in fact, after acid, the general director of the Bolshoi Theater Ixanov could not stand it, and he directly stated that the vene of the owl and behind the acid of Filin stands Tsiscaridze. After that, another letter of the indignant public appeared, which turned to Putin with an appeal to ban Ixanov to poison the great artist.
Soon after, Dmitrichenko, the soloist of the Bolshoi Theater, who ordered, according to investigators, was caught by an attack on the eagle owl. The official version of the crime says that Dmitrichenko did it for the sake of the ballerina Angelina Vorontsova, a student of Tsiscaridze, whom Ixanov allegedly clamped.
Given the evidence, it is difficult to doubt that the unbalanced Dmitrichenko really ordered Filina to a friend of the criminal.
However, three questions remain unresolved.
First: who pierced the wheels of Ratmansky and opened the mail to Janin, the predecessors of Filin? Certainly not Dmitrichenko, huh?
Secondly, Dmitrichenko’s actions were distinguished by some kind of prohibitive imprusibility. For example, Dmitrichenko did not just follow Filin himself, waiting for him to leave the Bolshoi Theater: in the car at that time, a witness, who was not involved in the attempt, the soloist Gabta Batyr Annadurdyev sat with him. Dmitrichenko called the performer in the presence of Annadurdyev, moreover, having heard that he needed another 3 thousand rubles, he took them from Annadurdyev (saying that it was on drugs), got into the car to the criminals, paid and left.
Probably Dmitrichenko is a very strange person. But why did he have such confidence that no one would surrender him?
The third circumstance is that after the arrest of Dmitrichenko, a noisy PR campaign and letters of Gabt's artists in his defense began. In the light of this PR campaign, Dmitrichenko’s actions did not look like a loner. They looked like the actions of a person whom someone if he did not hire, then persuaded or set, and this someone, influential and significant, is struggling to demonstrate Dmitrichenko his support, fearing that otherwise he would surrender him.
Here, in fact, this is the main question. Dancer Tsiscaridze, no doubt, great, but who is an owl with acid in the eyes? A?
Tsiscaridze himself does not answer this question very satisfactory. For example, on the air of “Echo of Moscow”, from the same June 15, he said the following: firstly, Dmitrichenko is a wonderful person, secondly, he again allowed himself to doubt that Filin’s damage was serious, and thirdly, he said a completely terrible thing, the degree of horror of which, however, a person who speaks “big is me” may not be aware of.
He said that Gabt's leadership visited Elepe Owl in early February and - literally - "they promised him to remove me from the Bolshoi Theater." Question: For what reason is a person whose theater career is over, a person who will never live normally, walk, all the more to dance or put up performances, a person who, God forbid, will restore 20% of vision on one eye - for what reason does this person, Sergei Filin, promise the leadership of Tsiscaridze?
Unfortunately, this story is not about the creative genius, which the soulless administrators stuck.
For example, I am the observer of Novaya Gazeta. And I write articles there.
Imagine that in addition to writing articles, I begin to say that Dmitry Muratov, the head of Novaya Gazeta - shit and a villain, that the New Gazeta is me and that I want to be its editor -in -chief. In parallel, there is a serious suspicion that I pierced the tire to one journalist, I opened the mail to another, I doused the third with acid. And at the same time I say: “This is what a mess is in a“ new ''. There are doused with the acid of journalists! The chief editor should be me. ”
They will fire me, and they will do the right thing. There are things more important than talent.
Pushkin has a tragedy "Mozart and Salieri." About how Salieri poisoned Mozart, because Mozart had talent, but Salieri did not.
Imagine in our postmodern time, when a genius and villainy ceased to be incompatible, another tragedy. The tragedy, in which there is a solid administrator of Salieri and the ingenious, talented, but - the greatness of greatness Mozart, who really wants to occupy Salieri’s chair and at the same time believes that everything is allowed to him.
He is a genius. He read Pushkin. He knows that what a genius does cannot be villainy.
Isn't it true?
Photo by ITAR-TASS/ Sergey Karpov
All rights to materials located on the EJ.ru website are protected in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, including copyright and related rights. With any use of the site and satellite projects, hyperlink (Hyperlink) on EJ.ru is required.