Chaplin, God and self -defense

Case with Chaplin, I would begin to disassemble from the end. The Echo of Moscow radio station, often inviting him to spiritual conversations, finally stunned by the next portion of bloodthirsty statements and stated that she would no longer let him in the air. The cup of great term has overflowed. The ban on the microphone was supported by the liberal public and, conversely, was convicted by the public patriotic, cynical. Chaplin himself considered the scandal with his moral victory: “For some reason, he told the truth about what Christianity is still. Hooray!" But also reduced bets. He did not call for the destruction of objectionable ones, but only for self-defense: “And I said that the Orthodox can defend themselves from the one who wants to kill them, the Russians have moral right to prevent terrorist attacks, and the church does not prohibit this.” And like, what's wrong here?

Of course, “not so” is only that it is not true. There was no question of self -defense, although in the “self -defense” there are unexplained moments. How can self -defense preempt aggression? The aggressor only thought, and his self -defense was already - Chick - and destroyed. Is it right? Is it Christian? Where then will you order to put the "do not kill"? Does such self -defense become aggression itself, and how to deal with cases when it is highly overstated when a victim of violence, for example, kills a rapist?

In relation to sexual violence, by the way, opinions are divided half to half, and, as far as I know, the Russian legal system, protecting the right to life, does not approve of female lynching. However, the same legal system is quite non -alternative when it comes to the presentation of views. Just at this moment, a twenty -year -old girl is judged in the Moscow District Military Court for the fact that she, in the order of thought on her page, published a prayer “About Allah, exalting the banner of jihad”. This girl threatens a real term, this prayer wants this certainly not her, and Allah certainly did not physically react to this prayer, Jihad did not support, being, as far as I know, deeply mythical ... Nevertheless, the girl is judged and, most likely, they will condemn. By self -defense from terrorism,

Another case of self -defense occurred in St. Petersburg, when, according to the order of the Caucasian law enforcement officers, St. Petersburg law enforcement officers arranged a small war in the city, killing several people in a certain apartment. Maybe there may be no for the matter, but, as I understand it, they did not attack anyone at that moment, and the order of Caucasian law enforcement officers, who often supplies us to the metropolis and hired killers , not quite to be a sentence. Yes, and the time is peaceful, for murders in residential buildings, this is not sharpened in any way.

But in general, our society as a whole recognizes the state’s right to self -defense from terrorists, reacts boring to bombing in distant Syria, for the same reason is not very surprised at the showdown between militants and law enforcement officers. Another thing is still, as the amiable Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin is talking about - the preventive destruction of social groups that interfere with the progressive movement to the bright future of Russia. This was done, in particular, Ivan the Terrible, to which they are going to erect in Orel. According to Chaplin, having coincided with his will with the will of the people, he destroyed mostly scouts, and cooked some in boiling water, frying others in a pan, and shot one of a bad person from a gun ... There were a huge number of scouts ...

Again, there is no firm evidence of crimes and sadism of the formidable. There are no entries from video cameras, only rumors. And even he, perhaps, did not kill his son at all, having previously fiddled his pregnant wife with a foot in his stomach, and his son, maybe he died, is a zakhvra. Repin did not draw from nature, and the picture is not a photo from a criminal case. But what happened with the Bolsheviks and then is documented quite clearly. And something, it seems to me, was not very different from the deeds of Grozny-after all, one archetype. Sometimes we calculate the story according to the past, and sometimes the past is present.

They killed everyone who was not lucky to be born in the right family - representatives of the so -called exploiting classes. The king was shot with a doctor, a servant and children, the corpses were doused with acid, threw it into the mine. In the village, kulaks were destroyed - those peasants who were unlucky to become not lazy people and not to sleep. And then they began to mow “their own” - for the views. Everything is under the same sauce: what if they are scouts?

The fascist and villain Chaplin leads his personal jihad for the same thing: what is wrong with destroying a certain number of “fifth column”? And he refers to the devil, to God. Flood, Sodom and Gomorrah. “Look, even God, if we read the Old Testament, if we read the Apocalypse, that is, the New Testament, directly authorized and authorized the destruction of a large number of people to edify the rest. Not as a punishment, not as a revenge, but for the edification of the rest. For the edification of societies, it is sometimes necessary to destroy a certain number of those who are worthy of destruction. ”

In other words, the early goddess was a mastic in the part of the genocide, and religion over the millennium reached perfection in terms of mixing in places “possible” and “defeating”. Then "do not kill!", Then "killing all." And Demagogue Chaplin is one of the best representatives of this universal demagogy. More important, however, another. The fleeting evolution of our Chaplin from democratic informals and freaks of the Yeltsin period (“But everything is clear: do not do what you do not want to yourself ...” - this is from the Chaplin’s article) in the fascists under the current regime. That you will not stop with one ignorance at the "echo". They will go somewhere with the Echo, and they will write a scandal to their asset. “For some reason, he told the truth about what Christianity is still. Hooray!".

Such as Chaplin, they go to the “echo” or do not go, lead the legion of demons, hiding behind self -defense. We say we defend from scouts.

An inevitable question arises for the head organization - the Russian Orthodox Church: “Do you agree with your former speaker, and the current Archpriest, what needs to be killed by a call from the chef - the Lord God? Where do you have this red phone? ”

I am sure that there are honest priests and honest kind Orthodox, but is it time for them to get out of trenches? Is it not time for believers to somehow decide in their morality, otherwise there are more and more temples, and morality and tolerance are less and less. So, maybe this is not all Christianity at all? Someone, as they say, was deceived.


Photo: Russia. Moscow. October 18, 2013. The chairman of the department of the Moscow Patriarchate on the relations of the Church and Society Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin during a press conference on the topic: "Traditional religions against the escalation of enmity. Capters of the interethnic and inter-religious world, a joint response to them." Zurab Javahadze/TASS