Self -reported

Among the comments on the historical event are almost all predictable and monotonous. Putin's supporters are pleasing to his determination. Opponents of the national leader are talking about a provocation that exacerbate a split in society. Unicorns accuse the opposition of legal nihilism. The opposition is charging the authorities of legal lawlessness.

Only one person in a whole Russia is trying to reconcile the irreconcilable. Being in solidarity with disagreements, he simultaneously protects the president. This is difficult, but he is trying very much. However, there is nothing to be surprised: Mikhail Fedotov is the chairman of the Human Rights Council, but is Putin not a person? Taking up for him, Mikhail Alexandrovich demonstrates the miracles of selflessness and nobility. The fact that the Nationalist signed well -known amendments to a well -known law, Fedotov blames himself.

“I blame myself for myself,” he says , “that I did not have time to bring to the president my point of view on the law already adopted by the already adopted text. I had to try to convince the president that this law, to put it mildly, is imperfect.” Fedotov delayed, and here is the result: Putin "did not have the physical opportunity to get acquainted with my opinion and the opinion of our experts." Well, he waved without looking, without realizing that the law, to put it mildly, is imperfect. Now, probably, regrets, yes, it’s too late.

Of course, this is a sensation, since it was still customary to be considered differently. That Putin, to put it mildly, was in the know. That he, and this is still mildly said, himself initiated the legislative activity of Sidyakin and other "authors" of the bill. That, if with its maximum softness to evaluate the president’s statements in only the last few months, then he wanted to spit on Fedotov, and his advice, and Russia as a whole, and on all non -disagreements in particular. Such, roughly speaking, was a picture.

It turns out that the picture was wrong, and today we can comprehend the meaning of the mysterious phrase that Putin addressed to Fedotov in May, at a meeting on personnel issues. “You are an adviser to the president, you can directly contact the president,” Vladimir Vladimirovich Mikhail Alexandrovich proposed generously. And he, apparently, did not take advantage of the offer. He wrote everything to Naryshkin and turned to the media, from which Putin just warned him. And here is a sad outcome: the law is signed, the president is unaware, and Fedotov is to blame.

A sad story is generally.

However, the question arises: does the chairman of the Human Rights Council say? Still, we know Mikhail Alexandrovich too long to believe that he was completely eliminated from communicating with Putin. And for too long we know the president to suspect him of a tendency to listen to human rights defenders. And if this is not true, then how to explain the repentant speeches of Fedotov?

Perhaps the whole point is that his advice is falling apart before his eyes: out of 40 honey regions, 13 have already left, and those who remained, as if again to express themselves, do not support the chairman in everything and do not always understand what human rights are. It should have left himself so as not to disgrace, but Mikhail Alexandrovich gave the floor that he would resign only if the council leaves half of its members. In addition, Fedotov belongs to the part of the intelligentsia, which is alien to radicalism: people of this type believe that almost any regime can humanize with their presence. They are also called conformists, and in particularly acute situations - and in various other words.

Meanwhile, there is an ethics of conformism, which is reduced not only to self -justification, but also in the same particularly acute situations - to the justification of the authorities. In the era of stagnation, it was supposed to talk about the kindness and peace of the dear Leonid Ilyich. You can’t say this about Putin with all the desire - and here the scope for human rights creative opens. For example, if there are no arguments left in defense of the authorities, and at the same time I still want to work in damn, then you can do self -flagellation. Take all the blame on yourself, excizing the president. And one must be a completely heartless radical or a hard -hearted ruler, so as not to appreciate the feat of the chairman of the council. To rudely laugh at him and suspect in lackey, cowardice, stupidity.

Everyone is silent - and Putin, and unicorn, and system opposition, and non -systemic ones. For what can I say when a person voluntarily puts on this overwhelming burden - other people's sins in half with personal career ambitions. You can’t say anything here, but you will only go to the side, clutching your head and wiping away the tears. Treasher, to put it mildly.