According to the 31st

The decision of the Russian authorities to allow Lyudmila Alekseeva to conduct a traditional rally in defense of the 31st article of the Constitution in an agreed place, near the Beijing Hotel, and prohibit the same precisely rally, but in two hundred meters to the triumphal square, has split the opposition.

The accusations of betrayal, in treason, in conspiracy with Surkov, Limonov called her out of all different, she ... However, she did not call him in any way, and this shows the difference in the characters of the leaders well.

Then I would like to notice a few things. First. There is no winning strategy when playing with a shuler . The current Russian government does not want to provide the nation with freedom, and if someone goes to negotiations in order not to agree, he will never agree. The Russian government does not want to negotiate.

In these conditions, you can behave differently. For example, the strategy of the USA, Europe and in general all civilized countries is to negotiate with Iran, Korea, Russia and other countries that do not want to negotiate. I am not saying that this is a good strategy. I just draw your attention that this is one of the generally accepted strategies. She does not expose in who leads her, a villain, a ministry and a sales creature. If the United States is trying to negotiate with North Korea, despite the fact that this is obviously useless, this does not mean that the American political hystblem was bought by the Blood North Korean regime.

Second. If there is no winning behavior strategy with Schuler, then what is the right one?

It seems to me that the only correct strategy does not exist . As there is no only correct route from St. Petersburg to Glasgow.

The concept of the only correct strategy is typical of the sect and atypical for ordinary life. If you are sitting at home and thinking how to spend the evening, you can read a book, write an article, work on a dissertation, go to the cinema or listen to Bach. And these are all the right solutions. Another thing is, you will shirten heroin - this will be the wrong decision. In other words, the presence of many correct solutions does not mean that any solutions are correct.

Translated to the realities of the opposition: if you carry out a rally and it is forbidden to you in one place and allowed in another, then you can spend in a permitted place, you can - in an unresolved one, and both of the right decision. This is not a fateful choice that determines the future of Russian democracy. But this does not mean that all decisions are correct. No, for example, it is necessary to join the "ours."

Moreover. The position of a huge part of the Russian population is that there is no need to deal with the shulers at all. Limonov believes that it is necessary to come to the Shulersky casino and light the croupier between the eyes; Alekseeva believes that you need to come to the Shulersky casino and try to persuade the owners not to distort. As a journalist, I, by virtue of my profession, was doomed to call Schuler Schuler every day.

But even more people simply do not pay attention to Schuler. And all this is the right position. You can not go to the casino, you can expose it, you can even work in a casino by a janitor, because, in fact, what's the difference: to work as a janitor in a casino or in a museum? You don’t have to be the owner of a casino in which the dishonest rules of the game. No need to be a croup. And a janitor can.

And the third that struck me was the reaction of part of the opposition to the consent of Lyudmila Alekseeva. Immediately, Alekseeva became a “traitor”, “creature”, “fell into senile insanity”, “went on about the authorities”, etc.

I'll tell you how to determine the sect. Very simple. The sect has no opponents. The sect has enemies. If a person does not agree with the sectarian in some ways, then he is lying or sold.

There is a well -known saying: "There are two opinions - mine and the wrong." This is a normal approach to business. If you think your opinion is correct, it is natural to believe that the opponent is wrong. The sect has a different position: "There are two opinions - mine and the devil." If the sectarian considers his opinion correct, then he does not believe that his opponent is wrong. He believes that his opponent was sold, survived from his mind, should be taken to a landfill of history, etc.

Gentlemen, what are you talking about? Come to your senses. Lyudmila Alekseeva for her entire long life has never committed a single meanness. I have never received anything for myself. She did not send boys and girls to jail, like Limonov, and did not tell later how they suffer there. Her head just hung on Seliger, and the young scum spit and shouted: "This is the enemy of Russia." And it turns out that neither the life lived in dissidentity, not the last ten years in the post of Mother of Teresa of the Russian dissident movement, does not mean anything.

Those sectarians who scream “survived from the mind”, “went to power” - how are you different from those who are on Seliger? Sign?