
If we talk about the sensations from the outgoing 2007, then for me they are such. The power for which is ashamed. I am ashamed of cynicism and pettiness, impudence and lies. Moreover, the tendency to take revenge on everyone objectionable, in my opinion, is unambiguous. You don’t only need songs on the topic “Ah, how bad ...”. Then there may be any surname. Bukovsky ... Kasparov ... Storchak ... Khodorkovsky ... Chervochkin ... Gozman ... Litvinenko ... Arap ... everyone can make this list at their own discretion, this list can be of any length.
Once again, I will remember the principle of legality-you should be judged and condemned not for the fact that you are extremely unsympathetic to someone, but for that, and only for what you did. No one doubts that the state is stronger than each of its citizen. So - it is indecent when the state of the hands of its employee demonstrates to a specific person: look what we can do with you. This is not about legitimate retaliation for violation of such and such a law, but about the decision adopted there, upstairs (where no one will ever say, although everyone understands that we have built a vertical). And the essence of the decision - we will delay you, punish, plant, kill you. Because we can do it. We can send the provocateur to a person who realizes his civil right to a single picket. And this provocateur, not embarrassed, will say why he was sent here.
I am ashamed of this power so much that it is already enough about it. Let's better about society. About a certain number of people united by one citizenship. And not about mythical interest on supporters and approvals. So, an actual number of people may not like what is currently happening in the country. And this does not mean at all that they are enemies. They simply disagree. As pensioners did not agree, who once took to the streets, being against the monetization of benefits. Glory to those, Lord, then there were no batons. To date, the situation has developed PATOV. The Russian citizen has no space for expressing his disagreement. You cannot vote differently, because everything was calculated long before your vote ... However, this is again about the power for which it is a shame.
So to vote - does not work. And all other ways of expressing disagreement can be equal to extremism or without any explanation are suppressed in the form in which they are ordered. There is no place in the opposition organization in a multimillion -dollar city, where there will be more than 100 seats for any site with the audience at least anyone will be launched for money? To what extent is the justification necessary ... Sorry, to cherish this power before the opposition in order to resolve the issue with the disagreement?
Moreover, expensive bears and cubs, including polar and koal, explain to me: if the same amount of riot police will simply observe the order in such a promotion, and not suppress it, which is terrible in this? It seems that these guys themselves provoke bloodshed, because at the moment the pair of output is overlaps again and again. How should the journalist Moral be afraid to expel her from the country with a secret resolution (see above - take revenge on everyone objectionable). If these disagreements are so few, then why are they so pressed? Will not gain Kasparov votes for the presidency? So let him hold a meeting and register the honor of honor. And since you do not let him do this, then you are afraid that he will gain? There is no answer, was not and will not be. This is not a royal thing - to give an answer. This is not a royal case - to observe the law. Yes, the dog is with them, I'm talking about you and me! Almost each of us has given an illusory opportunity to close in his sink, turn off the shut -off box to the damn mother and ... to earn money (as much as they allow), read books, fumble on the Internet until it was combed ...
And if your apartment has been robbed, then do not look for the truth, since the police catch disagreement, she is not up to the thieves. And if your relative was shot down by a son, a matchmaker or brother of an official, there will be no truth, forget it. Your place, citizens, in the hedgehog position, to whom someone threatens. To curl up in a ball, pick up everything that is possible for yourself, and lie quietly. Do not arise! I personally know many people who do not like Harry Kimovich at all, but who go to these marches of disagreement, because there is no such law - "not to arise." I will say more about myself - in the current circumstances I do not equally like Harry Kimovich, Boris Efimovich and Vladimir Konstantinovich. And they like it equally, since I can vote only for one of them. One !!! And I think that the case of the honor of each of them is to agree and put one. Anyway someone. And I understand the position of everyone, but I think that it is incorrect to call people to an unresolved action, if you cannot guarantee their safety. There is no such right to anyone-to negotiate with the shulers and me, the voter, to involve this agreement. And if they threw the party in the Kremlin for which I voted, that is, I have an idea. Go not to the industrialists and entrepreneurs that everyone is fastened on a hard collar, but to their voters. Are we throwing yourself away or fighting? It's time to comprehend the situation and make constructive decisions - to everyone. Otherwise, they will be transferred one by one.
I understand that it is easy for me to call for the constructiveness of those who probably thought about it without me. But there is no other way out. The direction in which we are moving through the whole country now disgusting. And society begins to understand this. Late, because there is already an established suppression system. But it starts that it is nice. True, you and I may not live to see the time when this bluff and imperial arrogance will burst the bubble ... But the borders are opened yet ... but I don’t like it, get out of here ... Why do you need to bring down from the country, which is the homeland?
Because you were appointed an enemy from the highest rostrum. And if they, from this rostrum, were mistaken? And they could not make a mistake, since oil prices are prohibitive. But when they are weighed, then the disagreements will no longer be scored by one by one to death, like National Bolshek Chervochkin, but to give an order to shoot to defeat in places of mass accumulation of the people. Are you waiting for this? Do you think that your age will have enough satiety? You are mistaken - this is enough for them for their century, but they don’t think about you. You must think about you, because you can protect you - we can (theoretically) law. And they will now make laws as they need ... again, I am not about the authorities, for which it is already a shame once again. I’m talking about you and me, whose last parade probably came when NTV was closed ... and continues to advance every time they killed such and such, and we are silent, they put it in a psychiatric hospital, and we have a mother-in-law’s anniversary .... Maybe, of course, we are simply not worried about these detainees, crippled, killed, missing ... The trouble is that in line each of us. Just accidentally walking along the street.
Today we see a systemic and almost daily violation of the Basic Law of the Russian Federation. They violate this law, as I understand it, securing the support of the guarantor. Because if the guarantor is real, and not linden, it must, at the first violation, punish the violators and beat his own people. And if the punishment and petitions have never happened even that it means that any law can be violated in relation to you. You can probably endure, taking the position of the hero of the Erdman play “Suicide”: “ God forbid you. Do we do something against the revolution? From the first day of the revolution, we do nothing. We only go to visit each other and say that it is difficult for us to live. Because it is easier for us to live if we say that it is difficult for us to live. For God's sake, do not take away the last means to exist from us, allow us to say that it is difficult for us to live. Well, at least like this, in a whisper: "It is difficult for us to live." Comrades, I ask you on behalf of a million people: give us the right to a whisper. You will not even hear him for the construction site. I assure you. We will live in a whisper all our lives. ” (The play was written in the late 20s of the 20th century.)