In society

Genius and a heap

January 25, 2013 Viktor Shenderovich

My uncle-Facebook was made up with me: several “Frends”, as part of the polemic around the Bashmet-Knikitin conflict, laid out the text from the magazine “However”-so I read it, fragrant.

The name of the text is “a great poet, shut up alive. About the non -browned young Moritz, who wrote the songs of the handshake Nikitin. ” The author is Dmitry Lekukh. The starting thesis, just Sergey Nikitin addressed: "Not everyone to condemn the Bashmet in the suit."

Very funny.

A graduate of the Literary Institute and a former activist of the extreme right wing of the fan movement of the Spartak football club (so respectfully certifies the magazine of its author) refuses Sergei Nikitin in the right to condemn Yuri Bashmet! At the same time, this ex-fan itself enables an outstanding musician (yes, I'm about Nikitin) to the potential "bards of the KSP of the city of Mukhosransk."

Neither the author nor the magazine see the comic in proportions-both names and styles, for Nikitin (to which Lekuhu is both before Mars), of course, was extremely respectful to Bashmet ...

All this particular, to which it would not be worth reacting at all, do not raise a really important topic in your text: about the “suit”, which gives the right to condemn.

According to the simple thought of the author, for this one must be some kind of trump suit, and all the other mugs did not go out to blame the hands with the greatness or non-browning of the great.

Yunna Moritz in this context - sew the mare tail. And this tail sews, in addition to the far -fetched pair, “The Great Bashmet is the insignificant Nikitin”, with a simple and obvious goal: to support the author’s shaky thesis about liberals, which are not suitable for non -Beliberals.

I recognize my brother Kolya, hello to you, the fan sector: their own - well done, strangers - sucks! Urine "horses"!

But Parnassus is not “Luzhniki”, and God's gift and God that does not understand club flowers and does not want to know such trifles as liberalism or conservatism. Lee God, nature - they give out from the leap shoulder without looking.

And without looking, they select ...

But the main thing: cases of Moritz and Bashmet are completely different!

Yunna Petrovna has strong political views. They can cause delight, they can - interest, can - horror, but this is a worldview. The Bashmet has no worldview, in general, it is not observed: he simply sparkled on the move something about greedy intermediaries (and how, interestingly, otherwise the children with disabilities can get to the United States?), And then the duty vulgarity about Putin, opposing America, said.

The second fundamental difference: Bashmet plays on the alt, so no matter what he froze, this will never affect his work. Although he go to the Adventists, even to the “Limonovites” - the fingers will find the right place on the grif, and the bow of the string!

Yunna Petrovna is dealing with the alphabet and meanings-therefore, her regrettable political views from time to time burns God's gift and she bursts out with personal rhymed obscenities against Clinton or sings Osanna Milosevich, crashing from the mountain carpet Khatushin from the newspaper “Tomorrow” ...

And, unable to help, we will aspire in awkwardness.

Or do not be side by - and, with all respect for God's gift, with all the life -life gratitude to Yunna Petrovna for the power and tenderness of her poetry, we express aloud our attitude to this kind of exercises.

It is forbidden?

Not according to the rank?

An interesting thought.

Leaving aside the rudeness of Dmitry Lekukh to the divine gifted Sergei Nikitin, imagine for a second that Yuri Bashmet would hear public censure from a completely ordinary person - then what?

This is the key question in the “Bashmet” history (and other stories of this kind): if the genius publicly put a bunch of parquet, do we, ordinary mortals, tell him “ay-yai-yai”?

Or you can’t put a bunch of a bunch on the parquet, but Pushkin, on the occasion of writing “little tragedies”, can I? And even to make a remark to Pushkin Count Khvosta has no right, because who is he?

And who has the right to make a remark to Pushkin? Tyutchev? Who is for? Let's collect the commission under the leadership of Lekukh to consider the sufficiency of the Tyutchevsky Dara for the remark of Pushkin about the superior heap! But before that, of course, we will collect the preliminary commission in order to find out who this leaku himself is and from which Bodun it ranks everyone?

But who, in turn, will enter the commission to discuss Dmitry Lekukh? Are we all authorized enough to discuss it?

Hmm.

Isn't it all difficult, fellow citizens? Maybe to stop these meaningless attempts to measure the members of the Union of Writers and other creative organizations? What does the old galoshes and merits have to do with literature and art? Genius you, not a genius - you need to lower the water for yourself. Do not lie, do not say stupid things, do not become a trusted face of villains ...

I suggest, for simplicity, to stop confusing God's gift with fried eggs and agree to the future as follows: you played well on the alt - a low bow to you and Belza in a sail.

And he imposed a bunch of - get on the neck from the first person.

Photos of ITAR-TASS