No comments!

There is such media on the Internet - the agency URA.ru. This resource was first attacked by extremists, and now Roskomsvyaznadzor officials are attacking because the extremists left extremist messages there, but the editorial staff did not delete these messages. More precisely, he deleted it, but not immediately. And this is very, very bad for the agency URA.ru. Because the officials of Roskomsvyaznadzor now seem to be able to close it through the court. Or they may not be closed, go and deal with these officials.

There is such media on the Internet - the agency URA.ru. This resource was first attacked by extremists, and now Roskomsvyaznadzor officials are attacking because the extremists left extremist messages there, but the editorial staff did not delete these messages. More precisely, he deleted it, but not immediately. And this is very, very bad for the agency URA.ru. Because the officials of Roskomsvyaznadzor now seem to be able to close it through the court. Or they may not be closed, go and deal with these officials.

But it was something like this: readers left comments on the materials on the site. There was something extremist in the comments. Roskomsvyaznadzor saw these comments and warned the editors of the resource, they say, extremism! It is forbidden! The editors of the resource deleted the comments and began to appeal the warning in court - they say, it's not us, not journalists, but commentators. Why should we be responsible for them? While the editors dealt with the supervisory authority, readers again left some comments on the site. In which Roskomsvyaznadzor again saw something extremist. I saw and issued a second warning to the editors of URA.ru. Alert! Alert! The editors went to court again, but the court took them and refused to appeal. And Roskomsvyaznadzor, according to the law on mass media, can go to court and achieve the closure of the publication. In more detail and with quotes of actors about this

wrote

“Kommersant”, but there is such a curious piece there: “Formally, now we have the right to go to court with a lawsuit to close the media,” Roskomsvyaznadzor spokesman Evgeny Strelchik told Kommersant. “But this does not happen automatically. Let's see how they react, we will understand whether this is a one-time flaw or the publication's policy. After all, such statements need to be moderated and tracked in time.”

There are many ways to leave a lot of bad news on an online media site. What if it's an attack on a resource? Well, the media didn’t please someone (which happens all the time), the comrades hired spammers-hackers, set them on the resource and “worked out” the situation ... What are the officials of Roskomsvyaznadzor guided by in court when they prove that a comment of extremist content is published on the site? Notarized screenshots, or what? And, perhaps, the main question: here Strelchik says that “statements need to be moderated and tracked on time”, but how long does “on time” turn into “out of time”?