The elections are over. Forget

The conversation of two psychoanalysts:

- You know, I always thought

that all these things Freud about reservations are complete nonsense,

But this morning I was convinced that they make sense.

- Yes? How did it happen?

- At home at breakfast, I wanted to tell my wife:

“Honey, please pour me with a cup of coffee,”

But accidentally agreed and said:

"Bitch, you ruined me all your life!"

In order to understand the real views, desires, intentions of any person, including, first of all, one who is inclined to hide them-and who is inclined to hide them more than the KGB officer and the highest politician of the criminal police and bureaucratic regime? - You cannot pay attention to his declarations, statements, speeches, etc. All his prepared speeches are aimed at saying what is beneficial and only, but the truth to him, who leads what he leads, is unprofitable by his nature.

Let's try to highlight several Putin's statements made by him along the past election campaign. All of them, in my opinion, are very symptomatic, although to varying degrees spontaneous. The first was made relatively long ago, back in September, i.e. Before Putin became the three “United Russia”, and was addressed to a group of representatives of this party. Then the informal leader of the party said to United Russia: "You must become a support of the executive branch." Thus, the “guarantor” of the Constitution, turning to the party leaders, who then had a constitutional majority in parliament, invited them to be, at best, assistants to the ministers appointed by him. Such is the attitude of the main people's chosen one towards other people's deputies, to his formal colleagues, and, therefore, this is the degree of his respect for the popular choice, i.e. To the people themselves.

I note, however, that if Putin really leaves the presidents and is not going to become the Prime Minister, then, then, whose support should be two-thirds of the “newly elected” Duma? And, most importantly, how do they value themselves, if they are ready to be a support unknown to whom? On the other hand, they themselves explained to us how exactly they value themselves. The Dersos, on the other hand, announced the Duma elections by a referendum on the trust of Putin. In this case, even if we assume that their result in the elections actually corresponds to the declared cycle, it turns out that almost two -thirds of the Russian citizens expressed trust personally to Putin. Personally. One. Without all. What does more than three more characters have to do with it? Following their own logic, no one voted for them at all.

The next statement by Putin was much better heard. I mean what Putin said about the party, the list of which he had already headed at that moment, to the workers of the Krasnoyarsk Territory. He noticed that, although we do not have the best party, but this one is not free from the shortcomings, namely: it does not have any clear ideology, and many crooks who strive for power were added to it.

Let me remind you once again: the political party in the true sense of the word is created precisely and only as the unification of people based on an ideological coincidence. The party’s absence of a clear ideology makes it not by a party, but by a group of citizens, united according to some other, extra-ideological, and consequently extra-political, grounds. As soon as we are talking about the party in power, it can be assumed that in this case, firstly, those who were deceived were united, secondly, those who were intimidated and forced, and thirdly, those who deceived, intimidated and forced, i.e. Those same rogues striving for power. Three passing questions arise. First: who will remain in this so -called party, if, as its leader requires, to cleanse it from the rogue? Second: since neither deceived nor intimidated are suitable for leaders, it should not be assumed that the top of this organization, including Those three hundred citizens “elect” December 2, consists exclusively or at least in the significant majority of the rogue? And the third: who considers them, all of us and, most importantly in this case, himself, their leader?

The first two questions have, of course, largely rhetorical in nature. But on the third, at least to its last part, Putin answered just a few days before the election, and did this already 100% on Freud. Meeting with his Council on Science and discussing the situation at the Academy of Sciences, in particular, the average salary in this system, the main unicorn heard that it was twenty thousand rubles a month. He did not believe it and asked in surprise: “How can it be when I have the average salary of twenty -five thousand in my country?” I can be mistaken in some words of this quote I heard from the television screen, but I vouch for the accuracy of the “country” in my country.

It immediately became clear that when Putin, answering a question about the birth of his studies during the census, called such a sphere of services to the population, he, to put it mildly, was cunning. I recalled that, in a similar situation, answering a similar question, Nicholas II was frank and replied: "The owner of the Russian land." It is this self-awareness that allowed and allows any colonel, becoming the sovereign, to change the rules of the Duma elections, to harass the prime ministers, changing the mock-fraud-fraud-flair-siblings, like well-worn boots, and think that a favorable economic situation will be forever. Moreover, if the power was obtained not as a result of labor and political talent, but by inheritance, then, of course, I really want to think that this happened not by chance, but by the dejection of the Almighty.

However, it makes no sense to develop this or any other analogy for too long. Apparently, it should be noted that we, largely of our own free will, ended up in a situation where in the country there is a group of rogues who are ready for any, the most humiliating, not to mention the fact that anti-constitutional activity, just to be under this very government, and not separately from it. Moreover, they themselves talk about this almost openly, without a shadow of embarrassment, but many of us citizens do not hurt at all and many of us vote regularly for them.

At the head of this gathering, the same type is worth the same, but, “inadvertently warmed by glory,” he imagined himself by God's anointed. He knows the price of his environment very well, he calls them the words that they deserve, but does everything to ensure that their power lasts as long as possible.

The problem, however, is that it is impossible to stop a moment, no matter how beautiful, honest and fair it may seem to anyone, even Churov himself. And as a result, we all, and consonants with this situation, and disagreed, were dependent on their, or rather, on his, Putin, actions and decisions. What should be done in these circumstances?

The ending follows