Anyway

We are talking and talking about this murder and every time we will inevitably go to the particular from the general, we analyze specific versions, begin to argue, confuse, assert. And arrange a rank - which version is worse.

But here you judge for yourself. If you take our time, people like Nemtsov are killed in America? I mean the murder not of an opposition policy, but in principle, the forcible elimination of a figure of a national scale? No. And in Germany? Not either. And in Britain there is no, and in Italy with its goat Nostostroy and Kamorra also a long time - and thank God! - There were no such killings.

In France there was Charlie Ebdo - well, there was a completely different reaction! We argue here how many people came out on March 1 on March 1-either 50 or 60 thousand, and in France we were rounded at 50-60 thousand, because we had to count millions! This story was a shock for the French, and for Europeans, and for the entire civilized (without quotation marks) world. For them, this is abnormal! And for us?

Nemtsov to kill is, of course, cool. But after all, we immediately build a deadly chain from the victims of custom -made murders of one degree or another of resonance. Boris's death stands out in this series, but does not stand out against the general background of our lives. I do not think Putin "ordered" it. But does this change something dramatically? Let this be not the most important person in the country, but someone is still influential and very close to the very top-does the murder look less crazy in this case?

It is suggested that this is the struggle of the clans, that the "hawks" are trying to cut off Putin some paths to some kind of retreat. Let it be, but it turns out that different clans are pumping the situation in the country in different directions in different directions and the president is not able to prevent or control this. It turns out that, regardless of the greatness and steepness of the national leader, some groups, special services and camps begin to lead their own policy at the state level, and anyone can become pawns and random victims of their game.

And if someone did this to whom Nemtsov stepped on the tail in the same Yaroslavl or some of his private wells (let's say this), what is this talking about? The fact that "people lost fear." That even the Kremlin has a showdown does not cost anything. In the end, he is an enemy of the people-they will not look for us because of him.

That is why it turns out that specific versions are certainly important, but even they fade into the background compared to the simple fact that we live in a gangster society. Where anyone can kill anyone. Maybe the state, cops can, can be bandits, nationalists from the boron can, can psychopaths, can be awkward lawmakers. And the authorities, on the one hand, indulge this, and on the other, even in those situations when it is interested in preventing a crime or its disclosure, it still can not make a damn thing, because it seems that it does not seem to control a damn thing.

Now, inevitably, the “heroes of Donbass”, fighters for building the Russian world, will pour into Russia. People who are accustomed to murder are used to war without rules, to the fact that lawlessness is the law. Feeling that you can live like this, they are unlikely to live in great hunting and return to the "peaceful life".

What should they begin to wet the national traitors? What should they begin to wet the power itself, which is not decisive enough? Borna militants have recently been a bunch of scumbags. Today, people like them are the main patriots and they are far from a bunch.


Photo by hedgehog