In the regions

A feat for whom?

November 2, 2011 Julia Latynina

A plot of the abduction in Chechnya by security forces without trial and the investigation of a certain Islam Umarpashaev flew from the air of the “central television”. As a result, the video on the Internet watched much more relevant people than would look at NTV.

In any case, according to NTV, I would not look him, but here - I carefully studied.

The cure is made professionally - the points of view of both parties are presented in it, which in Chechnya requires extraordinary courage, but, alas, I have not seen such a pure human rights tears long ago. Something similar usually expects to meet somewhere in a “cordian”, such as “damned-chicks put-in-meter-suicide-suicide-to-the-mirror-Mirny-Vakhhabits”, or in the reports of the “memorial”, but the “memorial”, to confess, is very mature and such tears did not sharpen for a long time.

According to Mr. Umarpashaev, who appears in front of a viewer with a bloodied bandage on a freshly-abandoned nose and a terribly beaten back, he was abducted about anything, accused-who would have thought-for ties with militants and kept four months on the basis of riot police. And when they became convinced that he had nothing to do with the militants, they began to prepare “to implementation”, that is, they fed well and waited for his beard to grow up to throw as a corpse to the place of special operation.

But then the “consolidated mobile group” of human rights activists spotted him “at the signal of the mobile phone” on the basis of riot police, turned to Strasbourg, and rose such a noise that the “bloody executioners” released the victim.

Every time a person tells such a story, I have a question: who is he, in fact, is an action movie or a “peaceful resident”. To this question, Mr. Umarpashaev himself gives an exhaustive answer, saying that once “people asked him”, and he brought them by taxi, and they “did something.”
The phrase “I just brought them” is a diagnosis. “I just brought them” is a branded excuse. When you hear it, everything becomes clear. At the same time, the funny thing is that this may be true - partially - in the sense that militants love to tighten the sympathetic. They like to tie with blood, substitute and take it to the video - but only those who are already nearby, because it is clear - no terrorist will blow the bomb on a very stranger: and if he surrenders? “I just brought them, and then one of them took a grenade launcher from my pocket, which I had not seen before, and the other from another pocket took out the machine gun.” Who would have thought! Ay-ah-ah. For this, Umarpashaev received his “just brought” 7 months-below the lower, that is, they shaked out of it, apparently, all the passwords-jackets and let go.

After that, Umarpashaev was calculated, according to his own words, on the Internet - he sat there in chats and scolded the Kadyrov’s cops. Whoever wants to, can go to the sites of the militants and see what exactly there they say about the federals and Kadyrov. You will laugh: work on calculating extremists through sites is a completely normal thing and correct. And in order to want to catch you, you must very much, on the site.

Then the full zvizdad begins in general, because Umarpashaev says that he was well fed under the corpse, and his nose is freshly, even blood from the bandages goes - so how is this consistent with “preparation”? How did the human rights activists calculate Umarpashaev “at the signal of the mobile phone”? Did he call from riot police in the fourth month? What, human rights activists have superpores that allows you to seize the base station and even calculate the azimuth? What kind of Strasbourg? You come to the Chechen riot police, say that there is a mobile phone of your relative here, and you: “Yes, yes, we just seized him on special operations. Would you tell me how the militants turned out to be this mobile phone? ”

In a word, the story of the salvation of Umarpashaev from the paws of the bloody riot police flows, like a sieve, they let go, because they decided to let go. They would not have decided - they didn’t let them go. Do not laugh my slippers.

In addition, in all this - as a party that decided to deal with the Chechen lawlessness - the investigator Sobol appears. This is the same sable that conducts the Estemirova case and tells us that the militants killed it. I have no faith to the investigator to the sable either on mustard grain, his motives are unknown. But I know that, including about Umarpashaev, I at one time came to Grozny Bastrykin; It was after this trip that Rustam Makhmudov, alleged by the Kolitkovskaya killer, was arrested. It seems that it was such a Turf War: the UK was very offended that they were not considered at all for people in Chechnya, they were driven everywhere, and just Sobol on the occasion of Umarpashaev was not allowed into riot police or somewhere there.

Since the film was made quite professionally, it still gives the word “bloody executioners”, who claim that Umarpashaev kept 15 minutes in riot police, and not 4 months, that his father “hadn’t let go of it for a long time” (that is, he was afraid that the guy would run into the forest and kept with him) and that the family was needed then to get a political shelter in Norway. Because it is clear - having a history of 7 months for aiding for militants and eloquence on jihadist sites, you will not receive political and political forces. So the version of the “bloody executioners” looks if not the whole truth (I don’t believe something about 15 minutes), then a little more true than the story about “accidentally drove” and “human rights activists spotted a mobile phone”.

But I, in fact, not about that. There is one terrible in the plot, taking part by the soul. This is the same story about the combined mobile group of human rights activists. After the death of Natalia Estemirova, these people continue to come to Grozny and live truly in inhuman conditions: in one apartment, always a group, only Russians, they change constantly, in the pocket always turned on the dictaphone ...

This is a feat, amazing with its asceticism - and its meaninglessness.

Guys, leave Chechnya - Kadyrov. After Estemirova, after all, leave me alone. Let them live as they want. They are not waiting for you there, you are bred there like suckers, and you are bred - terrible people. I do not know how often Kadyrov is mistaken. But in Chechnya, he is mistaken less often than you.

Printskrin "City TV"