Crimean war

The secret becomes obvious; Very soon, we will be able to objectively weigh the share of administrative guilt in the horrors of the Crimean flood ... while for now-about the obvious now: about the clarified relationships of the "people-fingertips".

There were several versions of flood in the very first hours; The main among them was the version that Tkachev and Ko specially sent water to Krymsk to save his own land and business near Novorossiysk.

The first folk version, thus, was the version of the conscious, mass power of death, self -interest. And nothing in the biographies of the governor with the dreams prevented the triumph of this murderous version.

Speaking more, these biographies contributed to its championship.

Which of the versions took, according to fresh traces, the last place in the minds of Crimeans? Answer: Official, voiced by Putin. According to numerous testimonies, in Crimean no one believed her!

Again, nothing strange: starting with the death of Kursk, Putin was publicly lying publicly without blinking an eye. The paradox is that it is in the case of the dam Putin that it is possible that he told the truth - but where to put a reputation?

So, the firm confidence that the Governor of the region could go to the massacre, protecting his business, and the president could lie, covering the interests of his own nomenclature - what else did the Crimean “VOKS Population” showed us?

Fear.

Almost none of the Crimeans who told reporters about the wild cynicism of the authorities wanted to call their name.

You ask: how all this is correlated with the solemn victory of United Russia and personally V.V. Putin in elections in the Krasnodar Territory? But in the most direct way and correlates!

And in the total power lies, and in the firm understanding of voters that the beloved thieving authorities, in which case, can kill.