 In the Kremlin I am ashamed, Comrade Gaidar!
 He came to the institute to E.T. Gaidar, talked to him. I am not authorized to retell the contents of our private conversation, but in its main, let’s say, it did not differ from the reperral points from what was recorded for the Mirror program. In other words, in a private format E.T. He did not say anything that would not fundamentally coincide with the declared before the television coat. Some things were alone in private more definitely, called their names that it is difficult or simply impossible to afford for various reasons, including a purely legal property. And all. Otherwise, everything that E.T. He speaks loudly about the circumstances of his illness aloud, he speaks quietly. And, presumably, he thinks so.
And the Gaidar says aloud that the last three years Russia pursued a very unsuccessful foreign policy, examples - Georgia, Moldova and not only, and thereby greatly undermined its international positions and strengthened the positions of its opponents, that is, those who wish her, Russia, evil - both in the country and beyond. That he, Gaidar, has a lot of claims to the current Russian leadership. But further-follow the lips-Gaidar claims that it was for someone to do it, and this very Russian leadership, which has pursued the last three years of a very unsuccessful foreign policy and to which he, Gaidar, had a lot of claims-so, it was precisely to this Russian leadership that was least profitable to kill Litvinenko. And poison him, Gaidar. And what they tried to poison him, and mortally poison that it was a direct attempt on his life - Gaidar has no doubt about this, since his doctors have no. And he survived a miracle, only because he began to die in fact during his own public performance, in front of dozens of people. These people saved him, raising his head and not allowing the vomiting of the vomit. He would lie quietly, as he should, in theory in this state, in his room, would definitely die. Happy case.
So says Gaidar. And, I repeat, he says that the least of all that he died after Litvinenko is interested in Putin. And who? Coatroners of power, unconstitutional options for changing power in Russia. Enemies of Russia - both in the country itself and beyond.
That is, Gaidar says the same thing, sometimes just literally that in fresh traces, immediately after the first news that he was ill and transferred in severe state from Dublin to Moscow, said Chubais. Who do they personally mean? Frozen wing of the "third -sees"? Conditional Kvachkov? Probably not excluded. But the hint, of course, is not at them. It is clear who. Not Newton Bin. And in one of the notes in the "hedgehog" a few days ago, this name, just in connection with the statement of Chubais , was already sounded.
Berezovsky! And further in that note there was a continuation in the sense-not literally, but in fact that-that our witticless deputies and their Kremlin chiefs, but Chubais ... are embarrassed somehow. I am ashamed of you, Anatoly Borisovich! Well, now Gaidar is also to Chubais. Both now rolled a barrel on Berezovsky. Two - for one!
Now I am embarrassed for them. Especially for Gaidar. Well, Chubais - okay. He is a man who does not know the words of love. Yes, and he has a considerable farm, so you have to dance under the Kremlin pipe. It’s ashamed, of course, this is true, it’s still ashamed and funny, but - where to go? But what? The intelligent, it would seem, man, there is really nothing to lose, not the institution, in fact, what kind of loss it is, and no one needs his institute, so what is he? Why humiliates itself? Is it really impossible to pull himself together and honestly, who, whose omnipotent gabet hand splashed a cycut into his tea? I think that we - those who are dear to Russia, who are burning with freedom, whose hearts are alive for honor - it is time, having finally shamed Chubais, to take up Gaidar. For Yegor, so to speak, our Timurovich. Drive him, a sickly, to a shameful pillar and teach who should be suspected of an almost successful attempt to send him to the next world, and who should not be in any case.
Here Berezovsky - should not. I have been convinced of this for a long time. It is worth us to use his name in a negative context (and for the positive, to my subjective taste, over the past 15 years he infrequently gave a reason), as I have been a derogatory look and a murderous hint of thirty pieces of fiber -loving public. Each time, as if I had publicly committed something sacrilege. He abused the flag, cleaned the temple. Or accused A.D. Sakharov and D.S. Likhachev in group rape. And it’s just about the fact that this truly talented person-I mean B.A. Berezovsky - according to the features of their psyche, combinatorics, ideas about morality, about how the world works, about its place in it, etc. etc. capable of everything. Without exception. And nothing.
Which does not contradict at all as the mentioned E.T. Gaidar claims to the highest policy of the Russian leadership, and to the context that he did not mentioned by him, but no less well -known claims to his leadership, domestic policy. It does not contradict in any way. It's just a completely different fairy tale.
Nikolai Svanidze All rights to materials located on the EJ.ru website are protected in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, including copyright and related rights. With any use of the site and satellite projects, hyperlink (Hyperlink) on EJ.ru is required. |