WTO is a modern form of colonialism
Well, this happened. The State Duma ratified the protocol on the accession of Russia to the World Trade Organization - the WTO. The decision was made by a majority of the votes of the ruling party. “If there is something positive in United Russia, it is that it votes for such things. The opposition, through the left and populist, votes against, ”Irina Yasina commented on the situation.
Indeed, the question of joining the second has split the opposition. Unified on the squares of Russian cities in the demand of political freedoms, different opposition segments obviously have different in the country's future . In any case, in terms of economic policy. Simplifying, we can say that the liberals advocate maximum integration into the world economy, all the others are more likely for economic isolation - Autarchy.
Among the "everyone else" we see the parliamentary Communist Party, the "fair Russia" and the LDPR. As well as non -parliamentary “other Russia”, “left front” and “party of business”. The latter, although little -known, was, it was its leader - someone Konstantin Babkin - became the hand of Russian industrialists objecting against the WTO. The Internet indicates that Babkin is somehow connected with Rostselmash, whose prospects after joining the WTO are very dull. This explains a lot.
Unlike Babkin, I am deprived of personal economic interest in this matter: I do not own factories, I live not in the monogra, where there is one plant, one place of work at all, but in Moscow, it is indifferent to material benefits. Although with the WTO, even if I personally live without I, but ... But it so happened that one day I “fell ill” with the interests of my country, which I understand primarily as independence and independence. Therefore, the clause on the economic self-sufficiency of Russia once entered the program of his party. And since then I evaluate everything based on this logic.
So, as a zealot of economic self-sufficiency, I note that I am not very impressive of the specific figures of the losses of certain enterprises or sectors of the economy from joining the WTO. As well as the total budget losses of 445 billion rubles only in 2013-2014. All this, of course, is bad, especially for those who are regarding personally, but this is not the main thing. The main thing is systemic changes, changes in the conditions of the country's economic development, the loss of part of economic sovereignty.
Any temporary losses can be experienced. For example, they can be justified by strategic prospects for the country. However, it is strategic prospects that we lose, joining the WTO. According to Russian industrialists, those whose work is to produce, and not just selling, entry into the WTO will lead to a loss of the share of the domestic market in almost all sectors. That is, we ourselves, voluntarily, give our own market, and therefore profit, and (most important!) The prospect of modernizing our economy to foreign companies.
“In 2010, we sold $ 32 billion abroad, but bought $ 152 billion abroad. As for agriculture, we sold goods for $ 5 billion abroad, but bought $ 12 billion. If we have nothing to sell, why should we go to the WTO for the role of the consumer? " - The representative of the Communist Party of the Communist Party Sergei Resashulsky asked the parliamentary question to the parliamentary question.
The argument on the response to the opening of foreign markets for Russian exports does not withstand criticism. We are selling mainly raw materials. It accounts for three quarters of all exports. And in order to change the structure of exports, we need a modernization, which we (you remember) actually refused. Thus, membership in the WTO will only fix the unenviable status of a raw materials exporter and the market for high -tech products.
However, what is there to be surprised? The successor of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) initiated by the United States and Great Britain following the Second World War, the WTO was created as an instrument of dominance of economically developed countries over the rest of the world. In fact, the WTO is a modern form of colonialism. The previous system, created with the help of the “Caunines Policy”, turned out to be incompetent and collapsed. She was replaced by more subtle methods of building economic dependence. Blessed, who believes in the altruism of countries - world leaders, but I always remember that no one has yet canceled the struggle for existence.
This, by the way, feels well a completely selfish Russian inhabitant. Often making a personal choice in favor of better foreign goods, he nevertheless feels the strategic danger of such consumer behavior. So, the two -thirds of the respondents surveyed by the “new region” expressed categorically against joining the WTO. Even more - 76% - spoke out in the same way during a telephone survey for Echo of Moscow. I heard it myself. True, look for a link on the radio station website yourself, for some reason I could not find.
Apparently, knowing about the negative attitude of the Russian voter to the WTO, our authorities practically classified all the information about the introduction. The protocol itself, more than two thousand pages, remained not translated into Russian. In any case, it was on this basis that Churov officially refused the initiative group of citizens to hold a referendum on the WTO. But this is precisely the question on which it would not be a sin to ask the opinion of the people. Otherwise, what are the current rulers, supposedly anti -communists, differ from them? Again, without asking us, they drag the country into a bright future?