Do not touch Rashkin!

They say: "Do not touch Rashkin!" After all, he doesn’t scare the audience with his bills that he hopes from Russia to make a horror room, and from the habitan of uniform Russian leaders - the salon Madame Tussaus. And to be fed with your stunning. Like a ball from the side, push off from your criticism. And gain the popularity of a cool movie star.

Actually, the popularity is negative. But it’s not bad even that. A person with negative popularity is worth a lot, he, as it were, has passed the loyalty test. With such a background as Rashkin’s, he will never give up rotten liberals. It will never become a “fifth column”. He is a certified "ours", in the sense of "their", to the brain of bones. He can be entrusted with the most responsible tasks.

They say: “Do not touch Rashkin, just pass by. He is a troll! ”

But how not to touch? How to get through? Then many who do not touch. Do not touch the Kurginyan, the incarnator of wars. Just because it shouts, the saliva is changing. Do not touch Limonov, who is always going to the crusade against Western democracy. Just because the next column in the newspaper Izvestia is embossed. Do not touch the "Izvestia" that these columns put with the joy of demons released . Do not touch the television demon of the whole country - Solovyov. And it turns out that wherever it is - only demons and there is nowhere to go from them, and wars are going on and demons write laws.

Not a member of the ruling corporation, but as if a representative of the communist opposition-the very one that for “all power to non-existent advice”-for his not so bright and long career, the communist Rashkin's deputy managed a lot of things. Harm. In the fourteenth year, a ruling corporation, regarding which he allegedly is in the opposition, initiated the so -called nationalization campaign ... elite. It sounded cunningly. And in itself it could be good. If you understand the appeal to the problems of the nation. But under nationalization, especially the “nationalization of people” (and the elite, whatever it is, is primarily people), in Russia they always understand the unambiguous serfdom, the nationalization of the slave, even in some modernized version with a deputy salary.

And then the proposal has passed - a hastily “nationalized elite”, for the most part, complicated access to foreign accounts and assets. Well, that, in turn, partly from herd vengeance, was concerned to complicate this access to everyone else. Of course, this is not an iron curtain, but the dream of the Russian kings of the nineteenth century pre -revolutionary: “All your European liberal undertakings will share about our borders ...”. In other words, the communist Rashkin almost embodied the dream of Russian kings.

Without calming down on his achieved, the communist Rashkin put his vote into the campaign to expel undesirable organizations from Russia. For whom unwanted are not very clear, and the legal in this campaign, of course, was not a bit. One chemically clean inquisition. Despite the fact that “undesirable” is not a norm at all, but a Wishlist. Mostly not very good people.

As the “foreign agent”, their countries expelled almost the only science of the Dynasty Foundation, which seemed to have never been a foreign organization, reached the hated Soros, about which the same Izvestia was written with a captivating sincerity before impudence.

Let not Soros set fire to Inion, poetically summed up in this newspaper Poet of the Guards. Let not Soros build up the "Arkhangelsk". Let not Soros disperses theaters. Let not Sos destroy Russian education. But ... "Cutting the ways of supplying the enemy is the case necessary." Voila! And cut.

Then, under the applause of the patriotic Klaki (cut, so cut!) For some reason, the way to the ex-president of the American Chamber of Commerce in the Russian Federation Sir Scott Blaherclina cut the way. Well, we don’t need to trade with the United States. And such a story. Clinton's friend, Sir Blacklin took a business visa (therefore, they gave this visa to him, the documents were checked, and these documents were in order), on which he could conduct any business activity in Russia. To buy, sell, conclude contracts and enter into their capital in joint-stock companies ... Probably, and participate in the meetings of joint-stock companies ... But for his trouble I decided to give a free lecture at the Lobachevsky University of Nizhny Novgorod in the framework of the Russian-American program to increase the entrepreneurial potential of Russian universities.

It would seem that everything is on the topic. The businessman talks about business. Where, one wonders, an encroachment on the Russian sovereignty? But our Blacklin landed on the same day in a special cost for violation of migration legislation. Together with the homeless. In the television passage of REN TV, they hinted vaguely that maybe he, Sir Blacklin, a spy. He leaked as a businessman, and he himself went to prepare an orange revolution among the Nizhny Novgorod students, and was not very logically connected with the Soros Foundation. They made a comment on the aforementioned Rashkin as the main expert on "undesirable".

However, we will not argue with Rashkin, we have no idea, this Sir Blacklin is a good or bad person. The surname is suspicious, with a shade of black. I even admit that in private life, Sir Blacklin drinks bitter and beats his wife (although it is not like a photograph ) and is really somehow connected with the Soros Foundation. But if he suddenly began to call on the Nizhny Novgorod students to throw Putin, would it really not have found the provocation of the Komsomol (or who is there now?), Who would have stood up and repuls the Clinton's friend and thereby stop the provocation by the power of faith in the correct course? Is it decent to drag the ex-president of the Chamber of Commerce into a specialist and tell strange things about Russia? Like that there for a performance in public we need special lecture visas and police permits, and for a walk - walking visas, and in order to exchange experience is a special visa for exchanging experience. As if Russia is not Russia, but some kind of crazy pirate somali with daily changing rules.

The last legislative invention of Rashkin is also terrible. Give 10 years to compare Nazi Germany and the Stalinist USSR. Although we will be fair here. In a commentary, stunned liberal publicists, apparently, crept in inaccuracy. Not for the “comparison” (which consists in the fact that the object A is compared with the object B for the subject of clarification, it is more, less or equal to object b), not for a comparative analysis as a genre, but only for “equating”.

And also for the statement that the object B. is somewhat superior to object A.

Literally : “Deputies of the Communist Party of the Communist Party in the State Duma Valery Rashkin and Sergey Obukhov proposed amending the Criminal Code of Russia, supplementing Article 354.1 by the ban on equating the political regimes of the USSR and Nazi Germany, as well as the approval of the superiority of the latter.”

That is, the assertion that Nazi Germany is somewhat surpassed by the USSR, for example, by the number of murders of political opponents-it is wrong, you will receive 10 years without the right to correspondence. And the statement that the Stalinist USSR in this sense is cleaner than your Nazi Germany - it is normal, go by. Rashkin himself on the air ... compared both modes. And he found out that the Nazism was initially bad, malicious, and communism is unequivocally good, human loving. Well, the fact that a good philanthropic communism killed more people than a bad and murdered Nazism is an annoying misunderstanding, we will not talk about it.

Of course, this last legislative innovation Rashkin and Ko can hardly receive a positive expert assessment of lawyers. It is too paradoxical in law enforcement. After all, judges will also have to compare. But not for that, it is done. So far, a completely utilitarian calculation has been visible: to break through public opinion in the direction of relative reconciliation with repressive terms for saying a particular anti -mode position. And this, of course, is not only from the Communists, the Communists are only on the patch here.


Photo: Russia. Moscow. November 7. The first secretary of the Moscow City Committee of the Communist Party of the Communist Party Valery Rashkin during the procession organized by the Communist Party in honor of the 97th anniversary of the October Revolution. Sergey Fadeichev/TASS