In the opposition

Stockholm syndrome

July 25, 2012 Viktor Shenderovich

Relatives of the detainees in Bolotnaya Square expressed distrust to Alexei Navalny. So, judging by the media reports, the dry remnant of yesterday's meeting of the aforementioned relatives and Navalny looks like.

What logical beauty looms, huh?

So. On May sixth, the police beat hundreds of participants in a peaceful demonstration. The prosecutor’s office did not look for the provocateurs who provoked a clash or establish persons who authorized the inadequate use of force. The authorities, pressing the organizers of the rally, took into hostages people quite random, obviously not guilty of what happened and certainly in no way does not correspond to the scale of perfect violence.

And now the relatives of the hostages make claims - not a corrupt prosecutor’s office, not the Investigative Committee, who missed extremists, not to the leadership of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, who organized Mesilovo to Bolotnoye, not to the parliament, who was silent, not the president, the guarantor of unknown rights - but to Navalny, who was on the same Bolotnaya, who was the same by the same police, after he himself provoked the transition. peaceful action to hell.

Navalny tries to help prisoners - the quality of his help is unhappy! He is trying to explain himself - they answer him irritably, in indictment ...

Isn't it strange?

Maybe the relatives of the detainees tried to meet with a seagull and make a complaint - to him? To label Bastrykin? Ask tough questions to Kolokoltsev? To show your feelings in the face of Putin?

No? Why?

Rhetoric questions.

You do not need to be a psychiatrist to see: aggression towards Navalny is in the nature of sublimation. Here you can, without risking, give free rein to the feelings and words, at the same time demonstrating the loyalty of those in whose hands the freedom and the health of your loved ones.

You go right, comrades.

Photos of RIA Novosti