If the same course had been called “History of Religions,” then the tension in society, according to the minister, “would have been relieved.” “After all, the subject itself is of a culturological nature and does not in any way resemble the “Law of God,” said A. Fursenko. The minister is mistaken: the dispute is not about the name, but because of how to understand the definition of “culturological.” And no one has yet has not yet brought clarity to this issue. Neither did the minister. He only stated his disagreement with the thesis that teaching military-industrial complex should be based on faith, otherwise there will be no morality. According to A. Fursenko, “even atheistic education presupposes the presence of moral standards and moral principles." But one cannot but agree with this.