Or Putin?

They say, no matter how hard you try, I will still win... This rhetoric has already become boring even to him. And there is nowhere to retreat. For during the 12 years of his reign in one capacity or another, he almost completely destroyed the structure that would have allowed him to live in a country of which he is no longer the head. The system he built is only suitable if he is in charge of it. And recent events fully prove this.

United Russia was merged. But in addition to all other activities, the Edros have honestly always been Zaputin’s. Even the more than once mentioned principle of not surrendering one’s own was violated by the presidential candidate. I wonder who will be handed over next? The list is quite large - Churov, Egorova, Surkov, Yakemenko, and the monstrous Onishchenko... And everyone knows a lot... But someone will be leaked, they are already leaking.

Well, why the hell didn’t they pay the sycophants from Poklonnaya? And it was simply impossible not to steal the black money allocated for this payment. Greetings to Vladim Vladimirovich from the falcons he raised. No matter who the current government points an accusing finger at, it is they who have nurtured a system where it is impossible not to steal.

Refusal to participate in debates? Here’s the reason you like best: it’s not the king’s business, or he has nothing to say either urbi or orbi...

The story with “Echo” illustrates the thesis: we have no time to look decent, we have so much to lose, you can’t even imagine. Reconsidering the Osipova case in this situation is also a flex of muscles: we are not afraid of anything, take your Taisya, this makes us neither hot nor cold... But does a system that is neither hot nor cold from the cases of Osipova or Mokhnatkin have the right to a comfortable life , the Kipiani cases (where the judge demands to stop rubbing the Constitution in her nose) and Kankiya, who is beaten in the courtroom? But the system clearly shows that it is not indifferent to the case of Khodorkovsky and Lebedev. They will sit as long as we are in power, and we will not give up power. Yeah?

The message to society is formulated and practically verbalized: don’t you dare disturb us, and we may let you survive if you don’t stand in our way. Well, how do you like this message? I personally don't like it. And here the question arises in full force: who, if not him? I don’t really believe in the idea of ​​a technical person, but without any emotion I bend my fingers... Is Prokhorov better? Yes, probably... I understand why they let him register and so on. But the bottom line is Prokhorov or Putin? Answer by weighing the pros and cons.

Is Zyuganov better? I’m afraid that I personally don’t have an answer to this question, because in 1996, when Gennady Andreevich’s rise to power was more than real, all this happened in a country that was not cleansed. In a country where you could say yes and no. And today the country is already different, with the political field sanitized under dictatorship. True, Gennady Andreevich sounds somehow very quiet today... But he is already promising something quite liberal. I know the value of promises... I know what it’s like to live under the communists... But here we go again, bottom line, Zyuganov or Putin? Think...

Mironov, who has already shown his loyalty to Putin with such passion that it is awkward to call it loyalty... But, to some extent, Sergei Mikhailovich will simply be spat out by the authorities into the opposition, and today he also swears by quick re-elections of unfair elections... Mironov or Putin? We think, we weigh...

Zhirinovsky or Putin? By the way, those offended by Poklonnaya were going to vote for the latter. On the one hand, over many years of Zhirinovsky’s political activity, I personally have never heard him by himself - without the demands of the current moment. If we put aside all the clownery, Vladimir Volfovich always clearly states what is delegated to him (oh, don’t hit me) by the redneck electorate, the current situation, and so on. But on the other hand, this means that Zhirinovsky perceives the mood of society very well and... will be the way you and I allow him to be. This is generally the main thing. Were there a lot of people on Bolotnaya on December 10? Much on Sakharov on the 24th? Is there a lot on Yakimanka-Bolotnaya in the bitter cold on February 4th? You are not looking at official figures, you are weighing your own feelings... And think.

Or Putin? This is the main question for everyone. Answer yourself. And then exhale with a clear conscience: if not Putin, then is it possible to change the situation, the release of political prisoners and those imprisoned for someone else’s benefit and the emergence of real figures on the political horizon. What if Putin is possible?

Or Putin? And now, right on March 5th, they will start showing Kuzka’s mommy... And how many will they be afraid to show?