In uniform

Nord-Ost

November 2, 2009 Julia Latynina

Once upon a time there was an Egyptian named Muhammad Atta. He studied at the University of Hamburg. Mohammed Atta was not very successful, closed in himself and scolded the infidels all the time with his three comrades who visited the Al-Kut mosque. These were the native of the Emirates Marvan al-Shehhi, Yemenets Ramsi Ben al-Shibh and Lebanese Ziyad Jarrah, who had dreamed of being a pilot all his life: September 11, 2001, he fulfilled his dream and flew.

In 1995, Atta returned to Cairo, where the authorities, as luck would have it, determined him to work on a toy quarter for foreigners. It was supposed to take the old Egyptian quarter, rebuild it and populate it with actors in native clothes; Atta, of course, cursed "Low Woking in front of the West."

Atta returned to Hamburg; He worked at the Plankontor architecture bureau, prayed in the mosque and rented one apartment with his comrades for four; He signed the checks for the apartment “Dar-El-Ansar”-“The House of the Companions of the Prophet”. Perhaps he and his comrades would sign the checks further, but here, in 1998, Osama Bin Laden declared Jihad America and blew up two American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. The organization headed by Ben Laden was called Al-Qaeda.

This event at once changed the life of not only Muhammad Atta, but the whole world. The fact is that before that there were two types of Islamic fundamentalists. There were whole movements, such as Group Islamique Armee, in Algeria, who declared jihad against their own rulers, who, in their opinion, fell into the KUFR. And there were dissatisfied, not successful people in the West, such as Mohammed Atta.

A fundamentally new element introduced by Ben Laden was that he declared a defensive jihad against America, a “distant enemy”, a priority compared to the victory over the “close enemy”. Explosions in the embassies served as excellent advertising. Money and volunteers poured to Ben Laden. Al-Qaeda instantly turned into something like a venture terrorist fund. She was brought a business plan, she financed it and, if necessary, provided the missing marten and camps for training.

In November 1999, Atta, Jarrah, Al-Shehhi and Ben Al-Shibh went with their business plan to Ben Laden. It was easy to get: the Taliban ensured the perfect order in Afghanistan. In the Torah-Bor, the idea came to the court, and in support of the “Hamburg cell” two people were allocated from the closest encirclement of Ben Laden-Khalid al-Midhar and Navaf al-Khazmi. Al-Khazmi managed to fight in Chechnya by this time, and al-Midhar told his brother that he was going to go there, but went or not is unknown.

Thirteen enthusiastic fundamentalists were also provided to help them-cannon fodder, who was immediately gained in training camps in Haldan and Al-Faruk, for the sole purpose-to control passengers. Four of the guys, Brothers Vile and Valid al-Shehri and the Ahmed and Hamza al-Hamdy brothers, were going to go to Chechnya, but when they were offered to the twin tan instead of Chechnya, it was like a provincial theater to star in the Hollywood blockbuster.

Why am I telling in such detail about this? Because any person in the USA who is important to know what happened 9/11 can easily do this.

He recognizes the names of all terrorists; He learns that Ziyad Jarrah wanted to learn how to fly, and Mohammed Atta was fired from work. He learns that they were going to Al-Kuts mosque and that Mohammed Atta visited Afghanistan a year before this general arrival. He recognizes the biographies of Khalid al-Midhara and Navaf al-Khazmi, and he finds out that when it turned out that these two bearded veterans could not learn piloting, they found another-Saudit Hani Hanjur, and the Frenchman Tsaria Musai, who was originally planned for the pilot, was arrested and flew only into the bench.

Of course, there are morons who do not want to know anything, because they already know that the twin towers exploded the CIA. To study something that complements this their secret and comprehensive knowledge below the dignity of morons.

What am I going to? What do we know about Nord-Ost? Answer: Nothing. The resolution of investigator Kalchuk says that Basayev began organizing a terrorist attack “in an unidentified place” under “circumstances unidentified by the investigation”.

How many were killed? So far, lawyer Igor Trunov was engaged in the case, to whom we are no less than the investigator Kalchuk owed in the investigation of Nord-Ost, there were 130 people who died. When another lawyer, Karina Moskalenko, simply folded her corpses from hospitals, it turned out 174.

How many terrorists were there? 40 were killed. The indictment of the investigator Kalchuk says that at least 52 persons were selected in the organization. " There were 52, 40 corpses, everyone died.

Lobachevsky and Gedel revolve in the coffin of envy. A certain Siberian Chekist told a certain friend that on the night of the assault, he staggered near the Nord-Ost and after the assault went through the cordon and helped to pull the hostages. He was drunk and does not remember how he put them: face up or down. This, of course, is not information, but one grandmother said. But if the Chekist has passed, what prevented anyone from going out?

What were the surnames of the terrorists? We know as many as 33 names, because 33 passports found 33 passports in Nord-Ost. Who is without a passport, he was lost. Excuse me, on September 11, there are no dust left of those people, and the Americans know every name. With us, they are all intact, and who is unknown. Here, there was one Arab - Yasir. Who is Yasir? How is Yasir? Why did the Americans recount their Arabs, but on Dubrovka - no? A couple of years passed, and Colonel General Zhoshelev told Rossiy Gazeta about Arab-terrorist Yasira, operating in the North Caucasus. It turns out that Yasir left Nord-Ost?

It seems that the FSB had an internal investigation about why there were so many people among the terrorists listed as FSB agents. Was it not?

In the resolution of investigator Kalchuk, the dead terrorists are described as follows: “Akhmetov Akhmed Mumadievich, was a member of the Jama-Ata Wahhabi movement. Bimurzaev Magomed Emith Saidanovich, member of the Wahhabi movement "Jama-At".

I don’t even know what to say to the investigator Kalchuk. "Jamaat" is not the name of the movement. It just means a "community". Jamaat can be traditional, Wahhabian, rural, you can pray to all Jamaat; Jamaat can choose an imam and speak “against” or “for”. How would you react to the investigator who writes that the murdered person was a member of the Orekhov group "Community"?

Which gas was used? The Americans, when the twin towers collapsed, wrote entire volumes, built whole mathematical theories. And we do not know which gas was used. But Putin knows that the gas was "harmless."

I want everyone to know: the fighters who took the Nord-Ost are also poisoned. Because you can’t shoot in a gas mask. And when the fighters broke into the hall, they dropped the gas masks and breathed what was. And then, poisoned, they pulled the hostages (and no one told them what to do with the hostages). They somehow did not plan to survive. They thought they were going to death. They survived, and many still do not have an apartment.

How was the attack prepared? How did you get to the destination? Where did you live? The Americans have all these questions in a permanent answer, and we have no reliable. What is this story about a gay club for VIP deputies who adjoined Nord-Ost and which Chechens repaired? If it was, explain what exactly was. If not, justify that it was not. The investigator in the case yells to the victims and rude to the judge.

This does not mean at all that Nord-Ost is a complete failure. Even under the cover of secrecy, we see that some things were done “excellent”. Negotiations were conducted with terrorists, which earned their vigilance and forced them to treat hostages much softer than in Beslan. Perhaps only thanks to these negotiations two martyrs did not explode in the crowded places in Moscow. Apparently, it was the people who participated in the negotiations that somehow carried the equipment into the hall, and everything was verified to the millimeter: where the bomb hangs, where the shahida is sitting, where there is a fuse and where not. It seems that there were no distance fuses, but if any shahida in the hall exploded, then everything would detonate. And finally, the assault, although it was a fatal risk, was verified to the smallest detail.

The problem is that we do not know what was excellent and what is a failure. Who had to give medals, and from whom to tear shoulder straps. Who was responsible for impeccable intelligence and assault, and who is in chopping an antidote. And whether it was one person or two different.

Because most of the hostages - they did not die from gas. They died from the fact that they lost consciousness, laid them face up and they saw their tongues. They died from the fact that they did not provide first aid on the spot. They died from the fact that the buses in which they landed were in a traffic jam.

Think about it: a successful operation turned into a nightmare only because people put their face up, not down.

And we do not know, Pronichev, Luzhkov or Shoigu was responsible for this, but we know that no one answered for it because no one was fired.

And I would willingly survive the fact that I do not know that. It's not about my personal curiosity. It just turned out that the mediocre order of one general killed one hundred and seventy -four people saved thanks to the special forces self -sacrifice. And no one was responsible. And it became clear that anything can be done.

And during Beslan no one was already thinking of saving the hostages. They were simply burned with terrorists.

Photos of RIA Novosti