Realism and science fiction

The publication of the article by Alexander Podrabinek in the “Hedes” caused numerous and, as they say, ambiguous responses. They also turned to me for comments from some Internet site, and I said I thought. My comment, just like the opinion of Alla Herber, was posted on the network next to calls to wet A. Podrabinka.

Then, before the heap, the text of Boris Yakemenko appeared, entitled "Podonoratinek and Co.".

For reference. Boris Yakemenko is the brother of Vasily Yakemenko, the first leader of the “ours” movement. B. Yakemenko-one of the main ideologists of this movement and is responsible, as far as I know, for his Orthodox-patriotic component. It is, like me, a member of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation.

So, at the beginning of his text, B. Yakemenko calls to the open physical persecution by A. Podrabinka: “Make sure that the whole life of the dubbin is turned into a nightmare”, “So that he could not go along the street without being spatched”, “And then he’ll fall off where he is good,” as well as “force the dubbin and walk through the streets with a certificate of what he is insane. "

Soon, however, B. Yakemenko becomes bored in the company of A. Podrabinka, and he decides to specifically “go through Carthage” for me.

I will give a few quotes.

“Here, for example, Swanidze, whose films about the history of Russia of the twentieth century could well become the subject of proceedings in the commission on falsification of history.”

“Removing an insulting sign (barbecue“ anti -Soviet ” - N.S.) is called Svanidze“ Changing the face of the capital ”.

"... the excellent phrase" Why not ask other veterans, and not only veterans? " Other veterans are the very traitors who are putting a scum as an example. ”

"... Realizing that he can go after the suburbanke to get certificates, Svanidze is bowed towards the war participants."

And finally, too, about me: “And the sub -Rabbine did not offend, and the veterans praised ... whoever came to power in the country and on television, ... all this allows you to be in the forefront, to acquire positions, titles, and money, of course.”

Well, it would seem, he bombed at the suburban, nailed me - and okay. Stop, rest - you deserve it. But no. Even the exposure of me, with all my posts, titles, and, of course, did not exhaust the creative potential B. Yakemenko. He carries him.

“From the same series and human rights activist Harutyunov .... And Herber ... and other Felgenhauers ... "

The glorious campaign is selected. It seems to be the Felgenhauer? And Alla Efremovna Herber? Well, what to lift up with the lady? No sense, no interest. Contradicts nature. But how will you hold back when people have such surnames! Well, by order. Pearls, Herbers, Felgenhaura - oil painting. Purely the case of pests.

It has long been known that it is the attitude to the “attendal” surnames and in general to the national topic that is the main and unmistakable indicator of the number of rubbish in a person. Non -precious shit.

Or here is another topic that is relevant now. Story. It is not clear to me how a person who positions himself as an Orthodox Christian can consider the name “anti -Soviet” to consider insulting? And at the same time, to have the impudence of something to tell me about the history of Russia of the twentieth century? Or B. Yakemenko never read anything about the history of Russia of the twentieth century, except for the “brief course”, and sincerely does not know that for the Orthodox Christian nothing can be more offensive than the word and concepts of “Soviet”. Or, more likely, he is hypocrite. And he is not an Orthodox Christian, but a vulgar conjuncture from politics, unreasonable, but cynical. Who, in the coffin, also saw, as, in fact, any other, but now it is ordered to praise it - he, cordial, is trying.

I would really not want the impression that I was opening a discussion with B. Yakemenko. B. Yakemenko is not at all interesting to me, like his opinion about me. Something to prove to him, or to explain, or to hone the bile wit on it is devoid of any meaning. What can be a discussion with a person who (and here he is just quite sincere) recognizes only three ways to conduct it: spatches, psychiatric examination and proceedings on the commission?

It's different. Holding me, B. Yakemenko gave me the opportunity to speak out on some important topics for me.

The main such topic is veterans.

B. Yakemenko stood up for veterans of the Great Patriotic War. He protects them from A. Podrabinka. He says: "Other veterans (i.e., those who are" anti -Soviet " - N.S.) are traitors." Direct, offensive lie.

My father went through the whole war of the ordinary, graduated from the foreman. He crossed the Dnieper, fought near Kursk and freed Budapest. At the same time, he always did not like Soviet power and hated Stalin. Is he a traitor? I ask B. Yakemenko and I hope that he will think before answering.

There were millions like my father. So they defeated Hitler. And for the most part they were flying.

No one ever fights for the regime or, especially, for the leader. Everyone always fights for themselves, which means - for the beloved, for children, for their mother and father. This is the homeland. “If your house is dear to you ...”, Konstantin Simonov wrote in his great front -line poem. Homeland is a house. He was protected by the front -line soldiers.

And in essence, the thought of A. Podrabinek, unfortunately expressed to the offensive inaccurate that the holy memory of the war is monopolized by a small group of status veterans - generals and nomenclature party workers. God give them health - they fought. But they are not alone. They are not alone at all. There are almost no ordinary those, the youngest for 85 years, in Russia, men do not live so much. And during their lifetime they did not open their mouths. So now you can easily say anything on their behalf. So they say.

This is first.

And secondly ... Well, the name of barbecue did not like the group of respected elderly citizens. So what? And if they don’t like someone's hairstyle? Or a skirt? Or the Constitution of the Russian Federation? Veterans, what they are, for Stalin or against, do not and cannot have an absolute right to choose our life path. And do not need to lie, mowing their eyes that they have this right.

They have another right that they unconditionally deserved. The right to our respect and gratitude. Not in the form of beautiful words on May 9 and a pre -election flattering flirting, short as a resort novel, and in the form of an opportunity to survive the rest of the days. Despite the fact that, I repeat, there are so few old people, but there are so many years that it will cost this state treasury much less than, say, the Winter Olympiad in the Black Sea resort.

That would be in which direction B. Yakemenko, at the disposal of which there is a mobile and easily controlled youth organization. But no, a fig with two. He prefers to teach adolescents to desert human rights activists and, apparently, believes that this is the best assistance to front -line soldiers. Similarly, as S.B. Ivanov believes that the GLONASS system is the strongest remedy against corruption.

Yuri Olesha once said: “When Hoffmann writes:“ The devil entered the room ” - this is realism. When Karavaeva writes: “Lipochka overfulfilled the plan” is fantasy. ”

So, when B. Yakemenko and people like him protect veterans - this is fantastic. They wanted to spit on veterans from a high tower. They need veterans for the same for which adolescents are organized: they use them.

I'm sorry for the old people.

But the young I am sorry even more.

Such as B. Yakemenko spread around themselves a stiff, clicks of obscurantism, which, as a bad disease, infect part of our youth.

Such as B. Yakemenko - and here they, especially as they erase ideological differences, are increasingly reminiscent of E. Limonov - mentally corrupt young people. They disfigure the children, forcing them to confuse power with violence, their homeland is with Stalin, and patriotism with evil complacency.

And by this, with all their personal insignificance, they are socially dangerous.