Girl and "Life"

In the newspaper, which will soon tear "Kommersant" and "Vedomosti", as Shef Gabrelyanov promised her, it was written briefly and delicate about this event. The skill of psychological reports is manifested from the first lines. So you see Natalia Vasiliev on the threshold of the Investigative Committee: how she enters there "with trembling in her hands and knees", dropping "documents from the folder." It’s not without reason that he is really worried, right? And here the reader who has already guessed about everything on the way is awarded with a metaphor. “Her evidence,” the journalist Evstifeev thoughtfully remarks, “scattered not only on the threshold, but also in the investigator’s office in particularly important cases of Alexander Drymanov.”

Actually, you can not read further - everything is so convex.

Further, the official representative of the IC Vladimir Markin convincingly talks about how unconvincing the answers of the ex-assistant judge Danilkin were. The human rights activist "explains" where the "papers" came from, and reports that Natalia wanted to transfer the time of interrogation. I was afraid, then. An expert drawing expert doubts that the document submitted by the witness (the "soft" version of the sentence of Khodorkovsky and Lebedev with someone’s notes) can be presented as evidence. In the end, we will learn that Vasiliev’s former colleagues no longer meet, and Viktor Danilkin did not talk with the correspondent Evstifeev.

In general, the picture is completely clear. A true person will not worry, answering questions from the investigator of the UK. Confident in her innocence, the exposure is not afraid, even speaking alone against the whole corporation. This witness of the prosecution will not drop the documents. And he will bring with him not some draft of the sentence with anonymous notes, but a video in which the crying Danilkin signed a bailiff to the dictation of the chairman of the Moscow City Court Olga Egorova. And if there is no video, then who will believe?

Of course, there is a skeptic, if not a direct enemy of Russia, who will say that such things are not so investigated at all. That the scandal, shocked our entire judicial system, demanded a completely special methodology of investigative actions. Not to mention the fact that the author of Izvestia, if for some reason he decided to conduct his own investigation, could not focus on the knees of the young lady. There are other objects worthy of a biased journalistic gaze. For example, the same text with notes: maybe, by ordering a private handwriting examination, it is still possible to determine the authorship of, for example, the chairman of the Khamovnichesky court? Or someone else's confident hand.

Why will the ill -wisher ask, the confrontation of the same Danilkin with Vasilyeva is not arranged? And why still not invited Olga Egorov to the conversation - that would see what she will drop there? And most importantly, how to explain the amazing fact that the legal truth in this case is looking for the aforementioned Drymanov - the one that at one time headed the brigade on charges of the prisoners of Yukos? Is it happening that it happened or is there any secret intention here?

Finally, if almost for the first time in the history of young Russian jurisprudence, such a wild scandal is being investigated, then where is Khodorkovsky with Lebedev? Why were they so hastily taken out of Moscow, without even waiting for the decision of the Preobrazhensky court, which seemed to soon consider their petitions about the parole? Where, again, expressed metaphorically, the escorts were in a hurry?

However, all these, of course, are idle questions. Or, if you like, rhetorical. In the newspaper, which will soon tear the Kommersant with Vedomosti as a tuzik heating pad, this kind of idle rhetoric does not rush. They do not take random people there, on the Yamsk field, but only the most trained pros who are able to literally say everything in a few lines - about the event, about the newspaper, and about the personality of the reporter. Actually, it is already tearing, but so little time has passed.