Translated material
Order of Stanislav
It's time to speak out according to Belkovsky, otherwise the harm from him is growing. They asked me here: where did Stanislav Belkovsky go from the lists of members of the Coalition Coalition? And why is his surname among 365 candidates for deputies to the State Duma from "other Russia"? I answer: the Organizing Committee of "Other Russia", gathered shortly before the Congress of "DR" on September 30, decided not to recommend Belkovsky to include candidates.
True, he himself did not ask for the inclusion of his surname. He somehow quietly walked away. Apparently, partly because at the 1st conference of "DR" in July 2006 he recommended coalitions to boycott the parliamentary elections. But the coalition, having thought, accepted mine, Eduard Limonov, a plan for participating in the parliamentary elections, and now this plan is being implemented. In short, he comes down to confrontation with the authorities. Due to the list of candidates for deputies to the State Duma from "DR".
I confess, I was against the inclusion of Belkovsky in "DR" in any form. Forced against. Since the following happened: as part of the expansion of the Coalition, another Russia, I and Harry Kasparov held several meetings with famous opposition leaders. Several times we met with Dmitry Rogozin. And in September, during one of these meetings in a cafe on Bolshaya Dmitrovka, a cup of coffee, admitting to each other, as it should always be diplomatic politicians, in friendly feelings, I suddenly heard a kind of apology from Dmitry Rogozin: “I am a burning out, Eduard, in April, when you had a“ marsh of disagreed, ”and we had a miting in a swamp. The squares, I spoke sharply about you.
"Who told you such a lie?" I became interested. The fact is that then, before April 15, Rogozin said in one interview that, they say, if Limonov dares to come here to us, we will throw him like a dog. I was then extremely surprised by such an unjustified verbal aggression addressed to me.
- So who said that?
- Stas Belkovsky.
- Wow! I exclaimed. - But it was Belkovsky who created the “people” movement!
- Yes? - Rogozin was surprised in turn. - And I thought it was you to delay the nationalist youth to yourself!
Kasparov shook his head and smiled: - Well, Stas!
We were learned by the incomprehensible insidiousness of Belkovsky ... and moved to the "other" topic. Although I was and remained outraged.
And on September 30, at the first Russian Congress, we still received a news from Mr. Belkovsky to the end of the evening. 59 delegates of the conference voted for a single presidential candidate from the Medical movement. Sergei Gulyaev, in no case did not pose a threat to Harry Kasparov, who was walking ahead with a huge margin, but surprises the perseverance with which Mr. Belkovsky does not want to abandon his, but inexperienced goal. What is his goal today? One can only guess.
Over the past couple of years, Belkovsky brought up in his test tube, in the office of the agency of political news, it would seem, completely alien to him by the nationalists of Mr. Belov - from the state of the embryo to sexually mature age. The sexually mature, when they grew up, left Belkovsky and even refuse him. Well, this is the destiny of all fathers and teachers. And now the "people" movement.
Mr. Gulyaev, like Caesar's wife, of course, is beyond suspicion. In my opinion, Gulyaev is an honest man who his undoubted feats on the “marsh of disagreements” on March 3 in St. Petersburg turned his head. Well, yes, he became a hero for a short time, but in order to thoroughly take root in the minds of citizens and grow into a figure of a national scale, one should remain a hero for a longer time.
The nomination of Gulyaev as a candidate for uniform candidates looks extremely frivolous. I would explain this nomination with a gesture of specific St. Petersburg separatism, if not for Mr. Belkovsky, who was behind all this. I was told by the Pskov and Smolensk associates that they had already arrived at them with a proposal to join the "people". I had the belief that the "people" were created specifically with the aim of splitting "another Russia" and my supporters in it.
Mr. Belkovsky in the past has already played a certain negative role in the fate of the then not prohibited NBP. It is enough to say that two of the seven participants in the Chelyabinsk conference in February 2006, who tried to shift me from the post of chairman of the National Basic party, - Nazarov and Latypov - were then (and are now) their own correspondents of the APN in Chelyabinsk and Khabarovsk. Moreover, Nazarov was the initiator of the schismatic conference. At one time, I considered it a coincidence. Now I am thinking about it. At that conference in Chelyabinsk, Nazarov, Latypov and others were charged to me in the “guilt” of the Union with liberals and supposedly withdraw from the nationalist part of the National Bolshevism.
Now the "people" of Belkovsky pursues a more intelligent policy: they do not affect me, but Belkovsky invited them to supplement the "other Russia" of the national component, having not been for this people among my supporters. The pretext, as we see, is the same as at the Chelyabinsk conference. And the goal is the same: to split my supporters of the National Bolsheviks following me. In any case, such a goal is visible absolutely clearly. Along the way, he caused Rogozin's jealousy.
Now we ask ourselves: who is beneficial for such a goal? Answer: Those who consider my supporters the most decisive, persistent and dangerous part of the opposition for power. That is, the Kremlin, the old square and their services.
Mr. Belkovsky in all respects is a pleasant gentleman: gives mobile phones, distributes bonuses, pays salaries, organizes round tables and conferences with abundant buffes, generously treats whiskey and cognac in his office. However, he, as it was now discovered, intrigues against us, and therefore we are obliged to directly, clearly and clearly expose his intrigues. So that some improper, honest and direct souls do not fall into the network of these intrigues. Which I did now.
"Other Russia" has long been distanced from Stanislav Alexandrovich. However, for a long time he pretended to be performing the affairs of "other Russia". Among other things, he used such a simple technique: he came on the eve of the "disagreement", say, in St. Petersburg, the day before the march gave a press conference, and spoke about the march. The impression was created that he was involved, moreover, he is the organizer and inspirer. In fact, he has not appeared at the meetings of the Organizing Committee of another Russia for a year and has nothing to do with it.
I did not say that Mr. Belkovsky is the customer of his activity. He is a performer. I did not call him customers. For whom he stubbornly created and fed in his test tube of the neo -nationalists Mr. Belov is a big question. In any case, the representatives of the oligarchs, as I became aware, answered this question negatively. Rumor has it that for one of the Kremlin towers. Who ordered him the "people" movement? I just called those coma beneficial to the emergence of the "people" movement.
And Sergey Gulyaev - Well, he, I said, is beyond suspicion. Just stupidly played on his ambitions. And on the ambitions of third parties, which were also used.
Meanwhile, the Russian people are more and more versed, who is who. The last survey of the center of Levada about the opposition parties pleased me. The forbidden NBP is considered an opposition party 40 percent of the respondents, it is the second after the Communist Party. So, in vain I have been working all these years.