Rus' and three

In our organic movement towards TeoPleptocracy, we have already gained our sovereign trinity - Putin, Medvedev, Gundyaev.

The point is not at all in the ill-fated watch of the patriarch-oligarch. Perhaps our Holy Spirit does not really know the worldly value of these perishable artifacts of postmodern culture, as his label -Pirman Fr. Kuraev. As the couple of the Orthodox neophytes of the Medvedevs does not know it, with such a youthful enthusiasm for a brilliant photo shoot of various products of the same Swiss company.

The point is in his crafty and politically come to the court to the father and son of the concept of the crisis as God's punishment for the sins of consumerism. There is a certain rational grain in this theological explanation. But why does our Savonarola constantly turn his angry sermons to people who have lost their jobs or most of the salary today, urging them to think about whether they deserve their salary? Isn't it better to ask this question first of all to himself and his colleagues in the three? Moreover, they all live clearly not for one salary.

What kind of solid Lord is this for solid gentlemen, who is so and the most sins of the most and the sorts? Following Ivan Karamazov, many will return respectfully, Mr. Gundyaev, a ticket to such a kingdom of God.

But not a son, who is just getting into the taste of the Kremlin games, enthusiastically knocks on a hoof and dreams of brutality to resemble Uncle Volodya, and "spirituality" to Uncle Cyril.

So they put his parishes on a stool in black Hollywood seduced category B from a steep film, scattered the naval boats along the back and scrolled a long “offender” to Ukraine on the telesufler to Ukraine.

It turned out a brilliant parody of Munich’s speech by Uncle Volodya. The Kremlin people repeatedly repeated in different audiences with important pouted lips, the Munich Opus is a list of offenses of our complexing kleptocracy, which is never accepted into real bourgeois, at the address of the attractive West for them forever.

The attempts for a large sovereign style, which were still somehow sounding from his father in Munich, turned into his son’s mouth into a miserable monologue of the detentee, rejected by the wayward neighbor.

The appeal to the "new leadership" and "healthy pro -Russian forces" once again indicates a complete misunderstanding of the Kremlin consequences of his policy in the post -Soviet space.

The "pro -Russian forces" in their representation are those who gratefully accept their stillborn claim to the "zone of privileged interests." But there are simply no such in Ukraine, nor in Belarus, nor in Turkmenistan, nor in Uzbekistan. No and cannot be anywhere. It is no coincidence that the Kremlin media are filled with helpless complaints about all our neighbors today.

The West is bad. The neighbors are even worse. Who will be exhibited by the next "offender" of our dancers? Read the extended "liberal" publicists. Anticiping the generous cut, they have already prepared it.

The Russian people are Dick, fascizoid and is not ready for modernization. We must bless Putin, Medvedev and Gundyaev, selfless asceticism by our folk rage of folk.