Old Libe

Not so long ago, the Investigative Committee at the prosecutor's office terminated the case of the murder of a royal family. The remains of all the dead were found and identified. At first glance, the only side showing a strange unwillingness to recognize this fact is the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church MP. Investigator Vladimir Soloviev published an article where in despair he describes this irrational phenomenon.

Formally, MP leaders refer to the fact that there is no “one hundred percent” guarantee of the authenticity of the remains. If they were limited to this, it would be a position worthy of respect, besides irrefutable - because there is nothing "one hundred percent" in the world. It is impossible, for example, “one hundred percent” even prove that Patriarch Kirill has a real, and not slightly modified double of the liberal bishop of the 1970s, made in the secret laboratories of the FSB.

The hierarchs of the Moscow Patriarchate, however, cannot resist and urge to find out if the murder of the Romanovs was “occult”. "Occult" in this context of euphemism, denoting "perfect by Jews." In fact, the fact that the murder of the Romanovs is completely by order of the "Jews", the leadership of the Moscow Patriarchate is convinced. This is evidenced by the fact that the Romanov memorial in Yekaterinburg is decorated with a quote from the Bible: “I will not spare it, because he burned the bones of King Osomsky into lime” (the book of the prophet Amos).

This phrase in the anti -Semitic myth of the murder of the Romanovs is interpreted as follows:

The most terrible crime, after the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, is to kill the king-the anointed of God and burn his bones into lime, which was made in July 1918 by the monsters of the human family-kabbalists with the Holy Tsar Nicholas the Second, naively believing that such a savage victim would provide them with world domination. This fact was completely unequivocally established by the investigation under the leadership of N. Sokolov back in 1919 and was confirmed in the work of P. Multatuli, published in the summer of 2006 in the Orthodox publishing house "Satis" with the blessing of the Archbishop of Brussels and Belgian Simon, and the Patriarch of Moscow II was even written by P. Multatuli for this new book. The presented materials clearly indicate that the Kabbalist Jews to establish world domination committed the bloody sacrifice to the imaginary God according to the Talmudic ritual.

Peter Multatuli emphasized that it was the Empress who read the book of the prophet Amos to death:

After the walk, the Grand Duchess Tatyana Nikolaevna read the Empress Alexander Theodorovna Bible, namely the books of the prophets of Amos and Avdia. In the book of the Prophet Amos, the Lord says: "I will not spare him, for he burned the bones of the king of Osomsky into lime." We cannot know why the Grand Duchess Tatyana Nikolaevna read to Empress Alexander Theodorovna the books of these Old Testament small prophets, but the fact that the above line is from the prophet Amos (am. 2.1) is a prophecy about the destruction of all the livestones, who raised his hand to the king of the Blessed man, and not just to any king of any people, we may understand completely Definitely.

It is clear why the investigator Solovyov was amazed at the statement of Patriarch Kirill made in Ganina's Yama that the bodies of the royal family were allegedly burned at the mine as the “King of the Tsar Pereomsky”: after all, “such a statement puts the cross in the further work of the church commission and extends the issue of recognition of the remains for an indefinite period.”

The requirement to investigate the occult nature of the murder of the Romanovs is not only irrationally, but also crafty. People who act with such a requirement demonstrate the conviction that “Satanists' Jews are a reality, that there are some“ Talmudic rituals ”requiring bloody sacrifices of a purely magical character.

I do not want to believe that the leaders of the Moscow Patriarchate suffer from anti -Semitism. But this is not necessary. Firstly, why do they "suffer"? They live them, they breathe them. Secondly, this is not the subject of faith-you just need to know.

The prevalence of anti -Semitism among the clergy of the Russian Orthodox Church MP is a fact perfectly known to everyone who rotated among this clergy. Father Alexander Men noted that this phenomenon is relatively new-only since the 1970s, anti-Semitism has turned into mythology, mandatory for confession among the hierarchy.

Finding traces of this anti -Semitism in church policy is not so easy. It is also not necessary to say that he is carefully disguised, however. There is a desire to disguise it, especially before the West. Therefore, Patriarch Alexy II twenty years ago spoke to the rabbis of New York with good words - and the lower anti -Semites are constantly quoting this speech to choose the patriarch, and fighters with anti -Semitism to praise the patriarch. Meanwhile, demagogy for export is not at all subject to analysis. This is just a “operational cover” - like those few “good Jews” who are found in some places among the employees of the Moscow Patriarchate. Provided, of course, that they are also anti -Semites or at least do not protest against anti -Semitism.

The story with the remains of the Romanovs is curious in that it allows you to find the connection of the anti -Semitism of the church tops and the anti -Semitism of the Lubyanka. It would be strange if this connection was not: after all, the selection of personnel in the Russian Orthodox Church was carried out until 1990 according to the strict control of the Lubyanka (no one denies this).

Perhaps it is precisely this connection that explains the completely mysterious refusal of Patriarch Alexy to participate in the burial of the remains of the Romanovs in the Peter and Paul Fortress in 1998. After all, the Patriarch never and did not mean anything contrary to the directly expressed will of the country's top leadership. And then Yeltsin wanted - but the patriarch did not come. It can be assumed that the Patriarch through the old channels turned out to be informed that V.V. Putin.

The chronology is as follows: the issue of reburial began to be discussed at the end of 1997, and it was proposed to combine Lenin’s removal from the mausoleum and the burial of Nicholas II. Yeltsin first liked it, then Lenin’s end was canceled. On February 27, in the morning, the Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church declared the remains dubious, and a few hours later the government appointed the burial of these same remains on July 17, and at the meeting, Metropolitan Juvenal (Poyarkov) attended the meeting. Yeltsin announced that he would not participate in the ceremony. On July 11, a rumor appears in the newspapers that Yeltsin had changed his decision. And indeed Yeltsin nevertheless arrived, which was a surprise. But the main thing occurred a week after the ceremony - on July 25, the head of the Lubyanka was appointed Deputy Head of the Presidential Administration Vladimir Putin.

Was Putin's appointment with a surprise? No - in any case, if you look from today. The appointments of Jews and liberals for various important posts throughout the Yeltsin rule were random and short -lived, and the advance of Lubyanka figures was a systematic and growing phenomenon. The general public saw the first, the nomenclature was perfectly aware of the second.

It is unlikely that the assumption will be too bold that Patriarch Alexy II knew about the increase in the role of special services and Putin personally in the leadership. Being experienced - with forty years of experience - apparatchian, Patriarch long before Putin’s appointment, he realized that the future was behind the Lubyanka and her people, and not for the Jewish Jewish. Nobody cut the Lubyanka communication channels with the Russian Orthodox Church, and this communication was not even hidden - it is enough to recall the creation of a house church with the abbot from the organs.

The refusal of the Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church MP to meet Yeltsin and Nemtsov on the question of the royal remains is a manifestation of close interweaving MP with special services.

The anti -Semitism of the Lubyanka is also the fact as undoubted as difficult to do. This anti -Semitism dates back to the anti -Semitism of the nomenclature, which developed under Stalin. In the 1970s, he acquired a new quality that combined the most disgusting sense with Russian nationalism. The conversations about proletarian internationalism were left. Financing and the preparation of anti -Israeli terrorism have become one of the important areas in the activities of Lubyanka.

The question is: how does this combine with Putin’s repeated performances against anti -Semitism, with a systematic judicial persecution of anti -Semites? To Putin’s honor, it should be noted that he never opposed anti -Semitism. He always emphasized the inadmissibility of "manifestations of anti -Semitism", and this is completely different. Anti -Semitism should be covered, and the best cover for anti -Semitism is a visit to the synagogue (some one, in the peak of another, to shake Jews with each other, which is fulfilled).

The trials against anti -Semites claim a monopoly of power for all violence, starting with verbal demagogy. That is how, protecting his monopoly, Hitler dealt with Remy attack aircraft. Therefore, the authorities allowed to plant the anti-Semitus Konstantin Dushenov, and now in Alexandrov they are judged for anti-Semitism by Vladimir Osipov, famous since the 1970s. The authorities need anti -Semitism humble and preferably discreet. However, anti -Semitism is needed. Therefore, Dushenov was imprisoned, but the bishops of the ROC MP did not touch the bishops cited by him, but it was the quotes from these bishops that constituted the essence of Dushenov’s crime. Dushenov, the former secretary of the St. Petersburg Metropolitan, was put, but with clear statements that the accusations of Jews of ritual murders (including the murder of the Romanovs) - slander, the leadership of the Moscow Patriarchate did not perform.

It is not necessary to pretend that the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church MP is afraid of its flock: they say, if we perform with the denunciation of anti -Semitism, everything will leave us, we must descend to the weaknesses of the herd, wait. The flock is not all struck by anti -Semitism, in this sense, the top of the Moscow Patriarchate is much more corrupted, here anti -Semitism is simply mandatory. The ligament of the “people-wilty” is always a carcotal system, and riding anti-Semitism is produced from below, but at the moment we can safely say that the riding anti-Semitism is stronger than the lower and inflates it. That is why the struggle against lower anti -Semitism in modern Russia has a taste of demagogy and cunning. The mosquitoes of anti -Semitism are gone and do not touch its camels.

Of course, people comfort themselves with the thought that something is better than nothing, and only this is not a universal truth. The struggle against lower anti -Semitism with support on upper anti -Semites helps anti -Semitism to mutate, strengthens it, makes it less noticeable, but more poisonous. It must be clearly understood that statements about the “creation of a single nation”, the introduction of a “compulsory Russian language” for high school students and other demagogy is the tip of the iceberg, and under water anti -Semitism, racism and nationalism, which is already turning into Nazism. It is necessary to deal not only with the "manifestations of anti -Semitism", but also with anti -Semitism, unexplored, disguised, with beautiful words on the lips and with very defined and extremely dangerous plans in the heads.