
No, the concept of "yard" is not suitable here. The very court, about which Mark Rozovsky staged the play "Songs of our yard", although even that court was a rather wretched Soviet court. But sometimes the queen was found in it. I'm not talking about the noble Arbat court of Bulat Okudzhava. About the court that introduced into the nobility.
No, Putin and most of his voters, small, vile, cowardly, worthless and envious, from the gateway. Though they, at least they put them in the Kremlin, at least on the throne in the granuted ward, will forever remain a street span with an intellectual baggage the size of a “shield and a sword” and with a vocabulary of a bandit of sixes (“wet in the toilet”, “hang over eggs”, “trim so that it does not grow”, “put off a club on the head”).
However, thisism for fools and beggars always takes the guise of such a fascist PR, even when it is not scary, but funny. After all, history should be repeated like a farce. The old, seventy years ago, passed to the archive and in Nuremberg, a gloomy fascist story. Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin.
So what does Mr. Putin play in and how did his PR project begin? The evil Hitler was content with antennae and bangs and did not practice cosmetic operations. He was ugly as a mortal sin, he walked the devil knows in which jacket, like any fanatic and vegetarian. If he looks like Putin, then only ugliness. The bald Putin clearly does not pull on Alena Delon. Then the differences begin. Hitler had a huge economic potential of Germany, an excellent army, the abyss of terrible and modern weapons, excellent commanders, feldmarshals, a bunch of disinterested fanatics in the Hitlerjagen. Putin, thank God, has none of this. Virtual Skolkovo, a stuffy economy, which goes into a pipe with oil and gas, a legally incompetent army, commanders like Grachev and Serdyukov, an obsolete weapon, falling planes, a holey fleet, sinking submarines, selfish “ourselves” and other earthlyna -blessings who “rush for Putin” is not for nothing, and if they are not in vain. Putin will be torn. I somehow do not see Annette Chapman and Herra Mishchenko with Faustpatron on the Crimean bridge, holding back the onslaught of the American Marine Corps. They will immediately climb into the fifth column through our democratic heads and will assure that they always worked for the CIA.
Stalin also cared much about his suit and his appearance. Red, red, heated, killed half the page with a shovel. And the same tunic. And no grandmas in offshore for a rainy day - neither he nor with Hitler. Boring people. In addition, Hitler had Volkswagen and Horch, and Putin had “Lada-Kalin” and in the projection of “Yo-Mobile”.
But with Mussolini there are a number of parallels. The basis is common - the priority of the interests of the state before personality rights. This is the essence of this. This is the basis of fascism. Mussolini demonstrated machism, started mistresses, was theatrical and extravagant. He also did not have a normal army, there were mummers. Costume ball. He began with a "small victorious war" in Ethiopia. Putin began with Chechnya. Do not feed them both with bread, but let them move their mustache or at least play with nodules, shave the saber, fighter, Grad system or tank.
Then Mussolini decided to turn to a glorious historical past and rested on the “Roman project”, forcing modern Italians to portray the ancient Romans and even the children's organization called the wolf cubs in memory of Romulus and the strap. Of course, it was very funny. And Hitler suffered, the terrified ally, whose handsome men fought so poorly on the Eastern Front (and did the right thing that they fought badly, because they did not need the lands in the cold snowy East), and then took and occupied Italy.
Thanks to Marshal Badolo for the rebellion - the Italians at least avoided the sad fate of the Germans. Only the poor jester Benito hit after the execution of the gallows, and even with his unhappy mistress. But it was already a might of left -wing Italian partisans. Duche was not bloodthirsty, he did not touch the Jews, he did not execute the anti -fascists, but only referred them to the islands. However, his rhetoric was quite at the level of "Ain Folk, Ain Reich, Ain Fuhrer." Mussolini liked to quote one school essay: "Duche, if my mother does not pray for you in the evening, I feel like an orphan." What not "tear for Putin!" By sentimentality and absurdity? It is exactly our option.
Only now we did not have Rome in the asset, and Putin was not able to understand the greatness of Novgorod, Pskov and Kievan Rus. They did not win anyone, just well, dignity and freely lived. The boots in the Baltic were not washed and did not rattle with spurs. So Putin has to call the bikers to call the bikers to call the wolves, then come up with a victory over the Poles in the Time of Troubles. And in the end, all greatness rests on the same Stalin and the ill -fated "Great Patriotic War." It is trouble, not victory.
On Ivan the Terrible, in which the Crimean Khan burned Moscow, and the Russian troops in the west were defeated by the Polish king Stefan Batoriy, you will not build any greatness. So Putin flies on fighters, climbs into submarines, dives behind lining amphoras and even sits in tanks. Either "topless", then kisses with sweetly sleeping tigers and bears. And his great conquests are beyond Abkhazia and South Ossetia do not extend. And the Duche, and the Fuhrer, and the father of the Fatherland, and the Nationalist, and hope -stomach (Russian spill - all from the gateway and at the gateway level). That is, Chizhik Putin, of course, ate. And for more, thank God, does not pull. Crooks and thieves do not shoot from guns poorly, because they rob a convoy, and not so much the enemy as their own.
The Georgians will remember our warriors and their armored personnel carriers loaded with feines, American uniforms, banks with jam and toilets for a long time. Duche was a parody of a Roman, Putin is a parody of the Duch. Moreover, instead of the Coliseum, we have Mausoleum.