That was the name of the famous film -documentary film by Juris Land, released in perestroika. It was a time when the iron curtain rose, the gates of the Soviet camp opened, and young people poorly understood what to do with freedom that their parents did not have. Now, when the story backed back, this issue obviously arose again. Only now: how to live when the space of freedom is narrowing, and the choice is between the conformism of the Kremlin camps and a completely serious zone?
There are no shortcomings in the educators of a variety of damage: no matter what the party is its youth movement (p. 5). The authorities are afraid of the youth and is in spurring to tame it, society is interested in raising youth. But: where does the upbringing end and the training begins (p. 10)? The Kremlin ideologists create artificial formations, arming them with the “black and white” ideology “ours”-“enemies” and not understanding that at some point this crowd with one-dimensional thinking may turn against them (p. 6). And nearby - a lot of young people who are not heard. Some in order to hear them, they are ready to go to the camps (p. 17). Others strive to leave society, go into philosophy - “death is no worse than life”, and now these informals - emo and ready - sophocles from the State Duma are almost considered the main horror stories of the Fatherland (p. 20). No one, including the youth itself, is not interested in the front and rebellion, but frontaders and rebels exist. What do they want? Freedom? Justice? Then why the conformists do not want justice and freedom? And where did those who gathered rallies and preached the ideals of democracy (p. 14) three years ago? Or children who grew up in the nineties operate on a completely different system of concepts? The New Times is trying to figure it out.
