Waiting for the verdict: Sergey Krivov

Prior to the sentencing to the accused in the “eight”, allocated from the “swamp business”, there were two days left. ATS-Info continues a project dedicated to today's political prisoner; His first heroes are eight people, arrested from May to October 2012, accused of participating in the riots, allegedly taking place on Bolotnaya Square on May 6, 2012, and in the application of violence to representatives of the authorities - police officers and fighters who dispersed the demonstrators.

Sergei Krivov prosecutors asked to be sentenced to six years in prison.

The last word of Sergei Krivov :

( Krivov spoke for more than four hours, fragments published by the New Gazeta , The New Times and on the Memorial website ) are presented :

“... in 2000, when Putin first participated in the elections, I voted for him. As it turned out later, the first and last time. Since 2003, gradually, step by step, the folding of democracy and the installation of the vertical of power began. Each such change was very painful for me personally. Perhaps just because of the character. While still a schoolboy, I have repeatedly heard from my grandmother the word: “They gave you free rein, and you took two.” By 2005, I had a stable attitude towards Putin as my personal enemy. Although in any actions, except for voting against him and United Russia, until 2010, this, as I recall, did not appear. But gradually reactionary changes in the state and society grew. With the construction of power vertical power, the main form of government has become prohibitions.

... The mechanism of selective application of new laws was supplemented by the mechanism of selective application of the right to loyal regime to citizens. The monitoring of the Company for those who have lost the internal rod by justice disappeared.

... The only thing that acquired the main population of the country during the years of the Putin regime is a feeling of hopelessness and fear for its future. Unfortunately, the bulk of citizens still does not see the causal relationship between the actions of the authorities and the own way of life, does not understand that besides them, nothing will make them free. Only a smaller part is aware of the meaning of manipulations done by the authorities and is outraged by their hypocrisy. Simple, zombified television people, unfortunately, do not experience personal responsibility for the situation in the country. I personally began to go to rallies against the Putin regime in early 2010, but the trigger, after which my personal struggle for freedom became weekly, was a cynical statement of screaming in September 2011 ...

... I went to the polls as an observer in December 2011, I was clearly convinced in the scale and the underminedness of those organized falsifications that were used by the regime to extend my dictatorship. My personal protest, as well as the protest of tens of thousands of people like me, was a logical result of the planned operation to seize power in state bodies, which was carried out by Putin and United Russia.

Such a protest on the eve of the inauguration was absolutely unacceptable for the regime, as it showed the whole world its illegitimacy. In any way, they needed to disrupt the rally, and it was done by a favorite and repeatedly verified KGB in the way - carefully planned provocation, with the translation of the arrow to the protesters themselves ...

... Based on the testimony given by the police chiefs about their actions and intentions on May 6, 2012, the following conclusions can be drawn:

1. The rally area was not only reduced relative to the February campaign, on which everyone could not fit in Bolotnaya Square , and occupied bridges, the opposite side of the Obvodny Canal and neighboring streets, but this decision made in advance was also hidden from the organizers.

2. The passage to the embankment, without any reason, was very narrowed by a chain of police officers, behind which there were more than 100 meters of free space, but which was ordered to stand here and put pressure on the crowd of protesters. The police chiefs did not fundamentally enter into any negotiations with representatives of the public.

3. The leadership of the Ministry of Internal Affairs very clearly imagined the operational situation - and the total number of participants before the start of the procession (at least 30 thousand), and the capacity of the swamp embankment without a square (17 thousand), and the number of people at the stage at the formation of traffic jams (2.5 thousand people) acted as it acted not out of mistake or ignorance of the situation, but in a logical, pre -developed plan. Parts of this plan fit well with each other, like a puzzle cut from a monolith. Even cars with investigators of the Investigative Committee of Russia arrived at the scene in advance. And they arrived, I note, not to the stage, but to the “drummer”.

4. After the inevitable in the current situation, the gap of the chain built from eighteen -year -old soldiers who did not have protective uniforms was given an order to detain all the “erupted”, and immediately on this basis the event was considered to be prematurely terminated. People, in the place of their main crowd, did not even know about this and did not understand why they began to detain and beat them.

5. To tighten the “riots” among the police, various rumors were dissolved about serious damage among the police and ordered to act as hard as possible. Even before the start of the action, tokens with numbers were removed from the police to depersonalize them and ensure their irresponsibility. And the most active units, namely the Central Administrative District, acted in helmets with faces hidden under the hits.

6. The detention under any pretext of the leaders of the opposition, without which the rally could not take place, is also a completely natural decision to disrupt the rally. And the obviously it was done more illegal, the better! Moreover, the chances of provoking the masses for response. But the police scene failed to call Mordoboy. Oppositionists did not led to the weakness of the 100 poorly equipped cadets. And the provocateurs, apparently, are no longer left. Resources in power are limited.

As a result of a well -planned operation, the leadership of the Ministry of Internal Affairs successfully completed the task of disrupting the rally against the inauguration of power in the country with a gang of criminals led by Putin V.V. The main beneficiary of the organized “riots” and the breakdown of the mass action was Putin and a group of persons from his immediate environment.

The purpose of the opposition was to conduct the most massive event and expression of its protest against the actions of the Kremlin organized criminal group. After the rally, the event could be directed according to a particular scenario, but the breakdown of the rally before its beginning, obviously, contradicted the interests of opposition citizens.

[A detailed analysis of evidence presented in court made by Krivov ]

1) The leaders of the opposition did not call for a breakthrough.

2) 40 minutes before the rupture of the chain, the turn to the swamp embankment from the small stone bridge has become almost inappropriate for the masses of demonstrators.

3) The police evaded negotiations. To resolve the situation, she did nothing. On the contrary, with its actions it initiated conflicts that would simply not have arisen without aggressive actions.

4) the gap of the chain was triggered by the spontaneous movement of the masses, the pressure exerted on them, from the back rows and the movement of the police chain from the front.

5) At the time of the gap to the police, unlawful actions were not used. No throws were carried out.

6) people who were depressed for cordon were not aggressively configured. They moved no further than 30 meters, stopped and talked among themselves.

7) Conflicts were initiated by tough unmotivated detentions, which were carried out with gross violations of the law “On the Police”.

8) inadequate aggression of riot police caused a logical anger and rebuff from the protesters.

9) The result of the indignation of the crowd by riot police was throws in police officers of various objects and the physical resistance of their illegal actions. People defended themselves and defended their acquaintances and unfamiliar people from the Horde of the Nazis, abandoned to overclock a peaceful, agreed mass action.

10) there were no weapons and pre -brought objects, except for one bottle with incendiary mixture, the demonstrators. The resistance of citizens of the police was naked.

11) The leadership of the Ministry of Internal Affairs deliberately reported to ordinary fighters provocative information to excite their excessive aggression to the protesters. The police were deliberately depersonalized by the lack of badge.

12) damage to the protesters was massive and an order of magnitude exceeded damage to the equipped and armed with special equipment of the police.

Summing up from the above, it can be argued that the leadership of the Ministry of Internal Affairs planned in advance and strove for such a development of events for:

- provoke a gap of the enclosing chain of police officers;

- Having covered in this fact, to begin a defiantly rigid suppression of the protesters;

- thereby initiate mass riots;

- to disrupt to his start a rally against the illegitimate seizure of power by Putin;

- To present to the authorities who disagree with the policy of power and to demonstrate to the population of the country by their example, what will be with him in the event of the enhancement of the country of the country of the fight against the regime that seized state power.

[Below are fragments of analysis and comparison of the testimonies of the police A. I. Algunov and D. A. Moiseev , supposedly injured from Krivov’s actions]

During the interrogation in court, Algunov claims that a man in a blue jacket, when struck by blows, stood facing him to his face, and Algunov at the same time held his hands on the vertical pipes of the barrier. And how can it occur to a person in such a situation to strike a person on the left with his left hand between the rods of the barrier on the rear of Algunov? This is almost impossible, or at least absolutely inconvenient.

<...>

There are already a lot of contradictions and questions. The video clearly shows that Kryva squatted a man lying on the asphalt and does not touch him. Moreover, the curves do not pull the hands or by the legs lying, and there is not enough Moiseev by the clothes. Further from Moiseev’s words it is not clear how, if the detainee was lying on the asphalt, and Krivov grabbed Moiseev by the clothes, how Moiseev could move away from the load -bearing detained police officers and head to crooked. He was already nearby! In addition, Moiseev took his right hand over the forearm of Krivov’s left hand, which can be seen in the video.

We read further:

" I tried to explain to him that we are doing our work and our actions are legal, and his behavior already contains signs of an administrative offense. In response to this, a man began to insult me ​​as a police officer, and then swung at me trying to strike with his hands in the chest area, I stepped back. Therefore, he could not hit me . "

Comments. The entire “dialogue” lasted 5-10 seconds (everything can be seen in the video and partially audible). To say during this time what Moses says is simply physically not possible. Krivov does not swing at Moiseev, and Moiseev does not pull away from him. These are all fantasies.

Further the words of Moiseev:

" Immediately after that, the same man quickly approached me and pushed me with both hands. From these actions, I briefly lost my balance, but resisted my feet. Having made an impetus, the man ran into the crowd and disappeared from visibility. I returned to the chain and continued to carry out the service . "

First. At that moment, he couldn’t “get close” at that moment, since he stood next to the Moiseevs and held them.

Second. Moiseev here does not say anything about the blow, he speaks only of a push. In what place was the push - he does not speak either. Also, Moiseev says nothing about pain.

Third. There is no mention of equilibrium in terms of face expression and actions and legs. The body and head do not change their position at all. Only the hands in the elbows move back when the crooked is removed from Moiseev. And the balance of equilibrium, as you know, is in the head, and not in the elbows.

Fourth. The man in the blue jacket did not run away and did not hide anywhere, and retreating several steps, he remained in the Moiseev visibility zone, who did not try to contact him anymore.

<...>

The “facts” set by the [investigator] Ermilov set out in the decree [on the recognition of Moiseev by the victims] have no links to anyone's indications or any documents. They are not justified, not motivated, and, therefore, illegal. On the basis of what, following Part 3, Article 7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, this decision is already an unacceptable document.

Further, on the basis of these “facts” and given that Moses was caused by physical harm, Ermilov recognizes Moiseev as a victim. Where did Ermilov get physical harm is also incomprehensible. Forensic examination was not carried out, although according to Art. 196 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, its purpose is mandatory if it is necessary to establish the nature and degree of harm caused to health.

Thus, the recognition of physical harm and the recognition of Moiseev by the victims has been made illegally.

If we assume that Ermilov and Moiseev jointly took part in the preparation and signatures of the decree on recognition of Moiseev to the victims of Stupak , and then there was an interrogation of Moiseev as a victim, why, signing under the fact that Stupak committed a crime against him, Moiseev repeatedly calls his offender an unknown man in a blue jacket?

Surname Stupak Yu.V. In the interrogation of October 04, 2013, which supposedly immediately followed the signing of the decree on recognition by the victims, is never used by either Moiseev or the questioning by him Ermilov M.V. Miracles!

Let's see what knows about the decree on recognition of himself to the victims of Moiseev D.A., who “signed” for the fact that this decree was announced to him, and for the fact that he received his copy on October 04, 2012 . We will study the protocols of Moiseev interrogation at the court hearings.

On the first day of interrogation ( 08/15/13), Moiseev leaves the answer to direct questions:

" - the investigative group, when recognized by the victims, draws up the corresponding document. Did you sign such a document? Copies received it? M:" I received all the copies that I needed . "

Next:

“ - Have you read a decree on recognition of you as a victim?” Do you agree with him?

M: I read a lot of papers, and now which one I can’t remember. I can’t remember the many papers that I read.

- You cannot answer what is written in the decision to recognize you with the victims?

* M: If I read, I could say.

- Do you know who the stupak Yu.V.?

M: - No *".

[The judge is trying to stop quoting, saying that supposedly crooked does not have the right to do this. Kryva draws the attention of the judge that she has no right to interrupt him. The judge says that he allegedly is not entitled to "pay attention." The judge asks if he has something else and curves says that he is good, he reduces the end of his speech.]

Similarly, what was said regarding Algunov, I ask the court to critically relate to Moiseev’s words, who, as it was just proved, as part of the criminal group of investigators: Eliseeva A.A., Ermilova M.V., Dondukova (?) G.I. , was engaged in the fabrication of the criminal case against Krivov S. V. This follows from the Video of the testimony of the witness Konakova T.M. , where it is clear that Krivov S.V. He did not commit any violent actions.

[The summary of Krivov’s speech, which he slightly reduced under the pressure of the judge]

On May 6, 2012, in the area of ​​Bolotnaya Square, I prevented the commission of violence and other unlawful actions by police officers and in a nightmare I could not dream that the guilt for someone’s unlawful actions, primarily police officers, can be charged to me, and even as a criminal offense!

According to the prosecution, said in the debate, I supposedly recognized the actions imputed to me.

I repeat especially for the prosecution. For my part, I adhered to non -violence. I opposed the obstruction of the violence, which turned out to be police. This violence naturally caused the natural indignation of civilians. If the accusation does not see the difference, then this is their problem. It is such a version of events that is confirmed by the testimony of witnesses who saw me in the square. Witness T. Rusevich O.G. at the interrogation in court showed that Krivov, along with other protesters, persuaded the running policemen so that they would not use violence, persuade him to wait, do nothing. Witness Kharitonov N.I. He showed that Krivov, as a normal person, even with the police, spoke human language: “ That you, the guys went crazy, because it is the state who beats its citizens! “That's how he talked to them about his life .”

I do not admit any guilt, I repeat it specifically for the prosecution. The one who saw the violence applied to innocent people is guilty and did nothing to protect them. I still insist on accusing the leadership of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and other law enforcement agencies, which organized a breakdown of the legal rally and beating of citizens protested to illegitimate power. Including the beating of me and other defendants in the swamp business. When the criminal case is initiated by events in the marsh investigation, an important fact is hidden. The fact that - that on May 6, 2012 the country's political leadership is acting consciously and pursuing its political goals, violating the constitutional rights of citizens to disrupt the implementation of an extremely undesirable and dangerous event organized for expressing protest against illegitimate elections. They organized riots, for which the regime decided, of course, to their opponents - citizens requiring compliance with the Constitution, elected legislation, rights and freedoms guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights.

Tough and unreasonable beatings on May 6, 2012 forced citizens in order to protect their health to resist the police who carried out criminal orders. The ruling elite tried to imagine the actions of the opposition as the actions of the hooligans who attacked peaceful police officers. Although it was the latter who behaved like fascists in the territory of the country occupied by them. Putin claims that he does not believe this, does not see facts. Why should he see? Why recognize the obvious facts to those whose goal is to exceed your guilt from your head - to the heads of opponents. I do not recognize this court. He was appointed president, de facto-one of the parties to the conflict. Such a court cannot be free and objective. All federal judges are appointed personally by the President and are included in the power vertical [The judge stops and draws the attention of Krivov to the fact that this “is not related to the case under consideration”], including the legislative, executive and judicial power. There is no separation of powers, as Art. 10 of the Constitution of Russia. I stated this at preliminary hearings, announcing the discharge to the court.

I think that people who follow the process had the opportunity to repeatedly make sure of my opinion. Federal judges appointed by Putin in the Commonwealth among themselves ....

[судья: « Я вас ПРЕРЫВАЮ, раз вы не слушаете моих замечаний, и объявляю об окончании процесса. Оглашение приговора состоится 21 февраля ».]»