People with a frightened soul

Our filmmakers have an extraordinary interest in history. And this is understandable, because the state is extremely interested in controlling the consciousness of people with the help of culture.

Since 1917, our entire culture has been focused on the implementation of the state order. They give money to order, and this is the most important thing for the current “artists”.

An unlimited autocratic state seeks to control everyone and everything. With the help of culture, you can plant stereotypes, simplified ideas about the surrounding reality, which the state is extremely profitable. All these stories about the original Russian monarchism, the great and special patriotism of the Russian people and so on.

People who apply for the title of cultural masters actually decompose the people, because they offer samples of behavior that completely deprive people of the performance not only about good and evil, but even about what is decent and what is indecent. A wonderful example is Mikhalkov. People who undertook to maintain power. The elder Mikhalkov wrote three hymns, all at different modes - and nothing, does not feel any remorse.

The general mood is as follows: the state, obedience, diligence, peppy step, a slap in theisral, face - all that was called futurism, and then discouraged by fascism and totalitarianism is sung. Now all this is being revived. The overall design of history assessment is changing. As soon as the state imposes its tasks, art begins to distort everything exactly as this state needs.

They need a unicorn, as in “1612” Khotinenko, there will be a unicorn, nothing to worry about. In general, everyone is taken to serve the state. The artistic value of the work is not important, because the main thing is an order. These figures from masters turned into artisans, and more correctly to say - people of the ancient profession.

The layer, which in our history is called the intelligentsia, was created in the thirties to serve the regime. The regime has always fed it with his hand and use it for its intended purpose at any time. Culture figures cannot separate themselves from the state. They do not consider it shameful to receive bonuses, such as Solzhenitsyn. The same Chekists planted him, and now they gave the prize. And he took.

People do not see samples of moral behavior. In a society where honor and freedom are not values ​​and people are not ready to sacrifice their lives for this, morality falls to a zero mark. We are a immoral society, and this is a great merit of modern cinema in particular.

The Soviet man is not at the direction of the party, but at the command of the soul is ready to fulfill almost everything - this is the internal need to be involved in the state. Well, since this also gives material benefits - what is there to reason.

From the young generation, we also cannot expect anything good. It is now prestigious to be rich and healthy. Cutting is considered, as in the XVII century in Europe, a sign of the disease. The Minister of Education Fursenko recently said: “We must teach children to be flourished in modern society.” In a present modern society, only scoundrels and lysoba can flourish. Young floats with the flow - this is their main principle. They do not see the values ​​of freedom. They don’t need freedom, it’s easier to do what they expect from you. These children are taught by teachers who-as Putin, how I-were born in the 50s. We grew up, formed under the Brezhnev mode. People with a frightened soul. And Zoshchenko said: “A master with a frightened soul is no longer a master. He cannot create. " This is an impotent regime and impotent generation.

Prepared materials
Oleg Dusaev