Daily Journal:

It seems to me that everything went very dynamically. It has been demonstrated that we are indeed trying to find an adequate response to the crisis. The proposals are serious, and we, unlike many well-wishers who propose to repair something in a collapsing building, propose political reform as a necessary prelude to economic measures to overcome the crisis. The position of Solidarity, it seems to me, is very consistent and tough; it clearly states today the liberal opposition to the regime, which is important because, after all, liberal parties and politicians have always been extremely cautious in their political demands.

It seems to me that journalists perfectly understand the whole background of our proposals and the thoroughness and elaboration of economic measures. How much they believe that these measures are feasible is another question: the power of inertia still exists in the minds; many believe that the current political structure, the structure of Putinism, still retains a margin of stability. But if we compare it with the journalistic reaction to our statements a few months ago, if we evaluate the trend in journalistic consciousness, then although mistrust remains, there is no longer a smile in it. Everyone sees that the situation is changing largely in accordance with our forecasts, and therefore, even with continued mistrust, they are ready to seriously discuss this, which, from our point of view, is the most important thing. There is a serious discussion of different scenarios, this is what the country urgently needs now. All the questions were relevant, they related to the political and economic components and indicated an interest in what was happening.