In the world of zhivotny

State affairs were complex, but Athenian men, potters, merchants, carpenters, sailors, copperits, tanners coped with them. Helped experience and a serious attitude to business.

M.L. Gasparov. "Entertaining Greece" I

Below is a monologue discovered by me on one fairly famous website. The capables who can use the search systems will easily restore the context and references to authorship, we will notice the following: since this site of trust does not inspire me, the author prefers to maintain anonymity, the replica is torn from some kind of conversation and the link to the source document will not open, we will proceed from the following assumptions: 1. This text was really written in November 2007;

1. It represents a direct and non -edited direct speech, reflecting the views of the speaker without irony and other allegories.

But the monologue itself (author's vocabulary, spelling and punctuation are preserved):

"The country is inhabited by a beast -like rabble, which simply can not be given the opportunity to choose freely. This rabble should mumble in the stall, and not burst into my cozy air -conditioned office. For this," ours "," newlyweds "and other cattle are invented. Is it not clear that at least the DPNI and the other are equal to the media and equal access to the media Brown from the country is not now, when “ours and other sovereign fuckers go from here. The Jewish surname to the Russian is to go to the Moscow State University. Glory to Russia! "

II

As the girl Irina Zaiko said for a completely different reason, “it was, of course, very informative and even exciting, but nothing supernatural.” We didn’t know that the service staff of supermarkets hates customers more than employers? What is a pimps closer to a girl than a client? However, the rhetoric of the quoted monologue is somewhat different. I would like to stop on it. Spontaneous speech (does not matter, oral or written) has one valuable quality - in its untidy folds you can sometimes find the fallen meanings filled with sieve of the responsible text.

The world depicted in the replica of an unknown author goes beyond the above social models. It is clearly divided into two subspaces: one is a biological habitat of "others"; The second is the world of the author.

The first space (simply called the "country") is inhabited by the "beast-like rabble" with "dirty hooves", "zhivotnaya", "aggressive-tupu-tuopa mass." All these in several Boskhov excesses presented in the text monstrous words deserve special attention.

1. "Believable rabble" is an expressive sound, here you are both alliteration and assonance. The clash of consonants poetically depicts fermentation and threat. In the word "rabble" another, the main word of the intelligent discourse of the XIX century, cheating in the next century by the authorities. The bearer of the highest values, at first the Russian, and then the Soviet people, of course, is far from the first to be unpleasant, but few people have reached such expression-even a general from the "Railway" Nekrasov, firstly, addressed his unflattering characteristics to various European tribes ("Your Slav, Anglo-Sax and German") and, secondly, operated on the opposition "civilization" civilization "civilization" civilization "civilization" - wildness ”(“ Do not create - destroy the masters, barbarians! Wild coup of drunkards! ”), Without entering into the area of ​​interspecific conflicts. In general, such a degree of hatred aimed at compatriots characterizes the caricature characters of secondary novels, bred by the authors in order to edify and shame Russophobia or anti -Sovietism.

2. "Dirty hooves" clarify the picture: before us is not just animals, but cattle, cattle. However, the further deployment of the text demonstrates that the negative hero has not only the features of herbivores: at first it will be likened to all the beasts at once, and the verb will be used below, here, “rabble” already acquires the features of the pig (cf. in the famous song B.G.: “My homeland, eats its sons”). The emergence of these associations is additionally motivated by a fragment "and the child does not need to change the Jewish surname to Russians" (no, I'm not anti -Semite).

3. The word "zhivotny" indicates the author’s self -determination - he demonstrates to us that belongs to the generation of consumers of Internet memes. "Zhivotnoy", which is traditionally sent to "Bobruisk", is always metaphorically and individually. Here, individuality becomes collective, and the metaphor revives.

4. The strange composite epithet "aggressive-tuopa-noshem" is given by one of the sources of the monologue. This is the perestroika of the perestroika of Yuri Afanasyev, who minted at the 1st Congress of People's Deputies of the USSR the formulation of the "aggressive-auditory majority." The lyrical hero of the replica under consideration thus gives his belonging to the world of the Soviet intelligentsia, the ideals of which are filled with them in the passage, describing the charms of the current situation (freedom of entrepreneurship, freedom of movement, freedom of speech, lack of national discrimination at the state level).

The intelligentsia was accustomed to contrasting libraries, concert halls, museums and kitchen - the space of information and private freedom to the hostile outside world. The new generation is building a model of the world differently - the world of the world is somewhat comic opposing here the "conditioned office". Both words are recent borrowing from English (it is significant that in the event of the victory of the opponents, the author is going to "break" precisely into the American embassy). The adjective-epithet refers to the ideas of coolness, purity, comfort; The noun denotes the author’s belonging to the clan of "professionals".

However, the most interesting in the replica of the anonym, of course, is not this directly spoken Smerdyakov vulgarity. The Putin Exfinition genre is most often represented by other concepts (“Russia rises from the knees”, “The end of the dominance of the oligarchs”, “The steady growth of welfare”, “Nanotechnological breakthrough”). All these arguments were debunked by the author of the monologue: from his point of view, they are directed outside, to the world of "animals" and are designed to protect the conditioned elite-office microflora. The author, without pity, burns everything in theory to worship: the “youth projects” of the Party of power are declared “cattle”, and their participants are characterized by a word reminiscent of the pseudonym of the famous network figure A.B. Nose.

The funny thing is that all in mind the movements also describe themselves as an elite, opposed to the dominance of lack of culture and ugliness in the world around the world, which the writer Sorokin, supporters of the ex-prime minister Kasyanov and fabulous skinheads are personified. That is, if you adhere to livestock terminology, from the point of view of an anonymous author of replica, these youth movements are something like elite cattle breeds.

The author comes to the statement of "Complete Freedom now" from the justification of the crushing at the beginning of the paragraph at the beginning of the paragraph. The media is not for the elite, but for the cattle, you can bark "in LiveJournal" (if I understand correctly, we mean the very site on which I found this text); It is noteworthy that the addressees of the statements (obviously mistaken regarding the assessment of the situation, but sharing conditioned values ​​with the author) are also likened to animals, but not meaningless livestock, which should cut or cut, but a person’s noble friend, although sometimes tended to spit into the wind.

III

I once had a friend, such Seryozha Mikheev. He said this way: “Only you never pour cognac to me. I haven’t drank it in my life and I'm afraid that I have a bruthery.” There are some citizens who are seriously talking about the dangers that freedom for Russia is reminding me of Seryozha. Someone reinforces this thesis with general considerations about the imperfection of democracy, someone indicates that democracy is not anywhere and has never been, that it was, according to the expression of one literary hero, the “pig of the wires” and the deception of the working masses; But all these reasoning sooner or later end with formulated anonymous theses about the lead essence of the Russian person. That is, a person in general, from this point of view, is rubbish, but a Russian person - even the devil knows what it is. So, the Smerdyakovs of the new millennium continue their reasoning, first of them, pigs, we must build in columns and teach to go in construction, and there we will look from our conditioned offices, what percentage of the elections to let them go to feed.

The temptation that such speeches is obvious is obvious. Indeed, they remind us, is it not the same thing in some countries alternating democratic elections with military coups that prevent a complete departure from democracy?

Has Hitler come to power democratically?

No, not the same. In Russia there is no strong democratic tradition, but there is no strong and decorated anti -democratic ideology like Islamism.

And Hitler came to power in a non -democratic way.

And the last one: people are by nature, and the Russian man is no different in nature from his Athenian man.

And Seryozha Mikheev once tried cognac. And nothing, hesed. No more than from vodka, at least.

IV

As for the author of the replica, whoever he is, I really wanted to say: it is not clear, a friend who has dirty hooves in this situation. It doesn’t matter whether it is bifurcated or not.