The channels must be cleaned so that they do not carry dirt into the houses. Now we are waiting for the duckling to flinch from the button on some stove. Let this ad stay for a while. And also the beginning of the one where the big-eared baby with the face of an entertainer twists his legs. And also the one...

Canals need to be cleaned so that they do not carry dirt into the houses.

Now we are waiting for the duckling to flinch from the button on some stove. Let this ad stay for a while. And also the beginning of the one where the big-eared baby with the face of an entertainer twists his legs. And also the one where the husband did not bring food. All the rest - sweep away with a broom. Why are they stuck for so long? Doesn't disgust for a face, voice, picture or text harm the product that they want to impose on us? From a citizen who licks her gums, she has been sick for a year already, as well as from her blendamed with a multistat, as well as from the poems “a lot of coffee, little cream”, composed, probably, by Aunt Asya. And you don’t always have time to knock out a lover of “great” beer, and a teacher with a raspy voice that tries to dress with taste ... The general impression is some kind of Zyuganovism, a lie with an unblinking gaze.

The screen is completely messed up. If you really would like to take a closer look at the guys reporting under the bombs and learn more about them, then why the hell are they giving us full-face, profile and even full-length authors of elementary street reports on TVC? Why the hell do we need Ms. Pushkin from five angles (NTV), if only her interlocutors are of interest? Is it hard to find calm hosts for culinary programs, so as not to hear the forced laughter of Ms. Goroshina (TV-6), who does not understand how to skin a tomato, and only eats and eats, squealing, and Ms. Rumyantseva, who still in the image from "Girls" and distracts the cook with idle talk? After all, as soon as these ladies have eaten, they are drawn to exotic cuisine, where all dishes are poured with French wine and fruit juice, the names of which Russia does not know (dark-skinned chefs only spread their hands: “You have this”). No - and it's not necessary, we'll make it. And at what labor exchange were they looking for artists for meaningless screensavers that cut the program into small pieces? Also, a musical phrase accompanies each such pile of garbage ...

There was a case, I reproached a policeman I knew, why he repeats every three words twice. He could not understand, and when he understood and began to specifically listen to his colleagues and superiors, he discovered that everyone does it. “We are probably stalling for time, not knowing what to say next!” he cheered. Not only the police and the army speak in this parrot manner, but often the television as well. One example taken from the screen. In the TVC Investigation program, a lawyer with the rank of Koshelov: “As for the program (intonation up), as for the program (down) for the protection of witnesses (up), the protection of witnesses (down), then there are a lot of complex tasks (down), a lot complex tasks (even lower) ... "

Cluttered speech is another form of airtime theft.

The channel's boss is a vacuum cleaner who is obliged to clean the screen from trash. A serviceable one can carve out whole hours for worthy programs, or at least a repetition of them. If Paukhova on the Culture channel has brilliance and cleanliness, like an exemplary housewife, then Ernst is a broken vacuum cleaner and abandoned in the pantry. Half of the programs can be scrapped as soon as they were born, and there is no time to repeat the efficient and amazingly fresh “Look” (apparently, therefore, driven to midnight) (I missed it - and you will never know in what other wasteland the former officers started build a city for themselves, and the refugees - for themselves, putting what they need on this government with its "hectares" of its own apartments). Apart from Vyazemsky, Kizyakov and accordion players (on weekends), Kvasha and Letskaya (on weekdays), there is nothing to even remember. RTR sat up to its neck in soap, but it wasn’t enough for him to have “wild pearls” and “black angels”, Sisi was also returned from exile, now up to the top of her head in the soap, from which the lonely Zatevakhin looks out. Even the super-vacuum cleaner (according to rumors) Dobrodeev, until the very end of his departure from NTV, endured the rubbish of polling the population in Tudeyko (Today) on trifles like “do you prefer to give or take, lie or stand?”. And Novozhenov (a worthy speaker on his daily program) fails to notice the contrast of this chatter with the dramatic real-life reports running back to back. And why is Voevodin, the author of significant programs of his own, sticking around like a lecturer in a bathhouse? It's time to run.

The listed rubbish lies in plain sight, and how much dust has eaten in and is not visible! The eye and ear got used to it, but sometimes you seem to wake up and hear, for example, Ms. Lakhova from the Duma: “If men put a woman on an equal footing with themselves, then she would have a choice ... For example, she could choose the post of president of the country. ..” It looks like a rebus: who chooses whom, she us or we her? Someone sighed on the radio today: “Putin has good image makers ...” I don’t know, I don’t see what they are paid for: a bouffant for Fateeva, a gait for Smirnova, a smile, as if he is serving a forced labor, well, except that he stood up to the St. Petersburg governor , for this you can throw them ... But the speechwriters are clearly parasites. The whole world has instructed the ear what the new Russian will say. o., but you hear all the same "forward, upward, higher and deeper," as in the last Ilyich. And this is not the theft of air time, but natural time, here you can lose not minutes, but years.