In the opposition

For what?

November 5, 2009 Boris Suvarin

PR, associated with the upcoming Medvedev Epistle, runs out directly.
He goes - a joint in the joint - for all famous rails.

"Russia, go ahead!" - Acceleration.

Immediately, after the “exposure of Stalinism”. The push leg always repels from this position - to make a jerk.

And finally, a general thesis: instead of nomenclature stagnation, fair competition is needed.

This is repeated by the Voices of Medvedev - Gontmamer, Budberg, Jurgens and further everywhere.

Well, who would argue.

All this is reasonable, wonderful, wonderful, and most importantly - self -evident.

From the point of view of the interests of society - self -evident.

So, acceleration and restructuring?

But there are three questions. Which are actually only three projections of the same topic.

Why is the lady personally need this?

First. Competition ... And the president himself and his close circle of this, by chance, are not afraid? Or for some reason they are in the holy conviction that this will not affect them? How did they write on bills, “without turning to me”?

Such complacency is understandable ... with the hereditary emperor, for example (and they were afraid of "messages"! And how ...). But people, as if not having sacred rights to power, are a little strange.

Second. But maybe I’ll give me so confident in my abilities, in the absolute competitiveness of my personally and my team in the conditions of an “open society”? Perhaps ... True, it is not clear what such confidence is based on which, who has a successfully won competition.

Yes, and everyone has precedents in memory.

Perestroika was in full force in 1987. Three years later, Gorbachev’s power collapsed in fact, after another year - formally. This is despite the fact that behind him stood the Makhina of the CPSU and the 70-year tradition of absolute obedience to the Secretary General.

I think that now it would not be needed for three years ...

Third. But maybe I’ll give it firmly who knows who, on which layer, what force does he expect to rely on?

The gabet-raw nomenclature will clearly be against these "bad jokes."

Opposition? It is absolutely virtual, powerless today. If freedom is “granted”, it will quickly gain strength-see 1989-1990. Only this power will be directed either directly against the lady (as the same opposition are written now), or not against him, but precisely what is “for honest competition”, i.e. We return to paragraph 2.

"Society as a whole"? Firstly, it is demagogy, such a phenomenon in nature does not exist. Secondly, the “people” have no concept of any “modernization”-“the widow is sleeping and sees a dream”. Thirdly, after the awakening of the “wide masses”, he will increase the hard opposition-and most likely National Polish. But the authorities certainly will not be able to manage the awakened masses - well, there was no such precedent in the history of Russia.

It is completely clear that Medvedev will not have without significant changes in the system of real power.

But it is completely not clear whether this power will appear (if we assume that he is striving for it) if changes begin.

Rather, one of two options can be allowed.

Or the vertical is generally distinguished - with both “duumvirators”.

Or a more massive head in this case eats more “tender”.

Are all these obvious things not clear to someone?

And if you are clear, what does all these conversations mean? Complete readiness for personal political self -sacrifice? Probably, it happens. Although I simply do not know such cases in the world (and certainly Russian) history.

Just PR? Why? What is the meaning of PR, which is not supposed to be put into business? Such PR will not strengthen - only on the contrary, it will cause unnecessary expectations and disappointment. In addition, from some point, the words already live their own separate life-regardless of those who said them for one reason or another. After all, the truth is not a sparrow: it flew out - you won’t catch ...

And all this is also obvious to everyone.

In this regard, I return to the original question - why?

Photos of RIA Novosti