
In Lugansk, supporters of Anschlus captured the SBU department , freeing the next "people's governor". In Donetsk, they broke through the regional state administration, putting the Russian flag over the house. Similar events take place in Kharkov . According to eyewitnesses, the Russian -speaking are armed with the advanced ideology of separatism, as well as explosive packets, chimney, bricks, knives.
All this, apparently, means this.
There are two strategies for political behavior after Crimean events. The point of view of the West is that Russia has grossly violated international laws and is now subjected to a whole series of punishments. Here are lists of officials who are prohibited from entering Europe and America , and freezing contacts in a number of joint projects , and the future deprivation of Russia's voting right at the PACE session . However, the West is not going to counteract the seizure of Crimea with stronger means.
In Moscow, they think differently. For Putin, the attachment of the peninsula to the Russian mainland is only part of the plan associated with the reconstruction of the Russian Empire in the previous or similar borders along the dilapidated but reliable drawings. Whether he will be able to embody the plan and death - God news, but he perceives sanctions for Crimea as a personal insult. Therefore, turning the board, seeks to change its rules in the course of a large political game.
According to this logic, Crimea is not discussed at all. If the West behaves decent, that is, it will be limited to minor sanctions, and then gradually will return to Russia the status of a great power and a member of the G8, then you can take a break and not yet annex Ukraine. Well, since in Europe and America the humiliation in PACA and other unpleasant things do not agree with him on the agenda, he answers in his characteristic style. The pogroms in Lugansk, Donetsk and Kharkov are events directly related to the West reaction to the rejection of Crimea. Thus, he seeks to neutralize sanctions, intercepting the initiative and hesitation of the world.
Two strategies, two options, two games, and the game of destruction that Putin provokes more and more in them. The game by lawlessness, and he is probably absolutely convinced that he is opposed to solid wimps and humanists who are ready to surrender to the East of Ukraine, and Kyiv, if only there was no war. The Third World War , the consequences of which was so eloquently painted by a city journalist .
A man is incurable old-fashioned, with hopeless imperial complexes, Putin still has not lost his connection with reality as to forget about the time in which he lives. It is impossible to imagine that at the beginning of the 21st century, the leaders of the superpower, wearing a tuxedo and meeting somewhere in Geneva, signed a knightly agreement on a war, which will be conducted exclusively by conventional weapons. The prospect of a direct clash between NATO and Russia therefore inspires the horror that such a war will begin with the exchange of nuclear blows. It is these fears that is exploited by the President of the Russian Federation when he invades the territory of Ukraine in the Crimea and prepares the ground for further advancement.
Actually, why not scare him, reveling in his power? After all, everything has so far succeeded in the Chechen Military, which began with the explosions of houses, and the Georgian and demonstration political processes, and the legislative war with the Russian people, slowly but surely approaching the country to the North Korean patterns. And the world suffered, wiped away, shuddered, showed understanding ...
This means that the capture of Ukraine will swallow, if you properly organize popular unrest, often remember Kosovo and when it is necessary to charge the official press releases with fierce links to international laws, which prescribed the right of nations to self-determination. It is only important not to stop; Stop stop - they will stop scaring. He does not slow down.
How to behave the West in this situation is a difficult question. The main thing, it is incomprehensible, will bluff Putin or, having entered the retirement age, is ready to take all of humanity into the grave with him. Polemicing with him, you need to act with a scalpel, no matter what it means, or a club? And what to do right now, when again there is a threat of invasion of green men to the east of Ukraine? And if you answer him with maximum rigidity, is the risk of nuclear war great? And if you continue to endure, where is the guarantees that Poland will not follow?
I don’t know answers, yes, it seems that no one knows them today. Unless the experience, historical and life, suggests that in difficult moments in appearance such a scattered, humanistic and weak civilized world can show firmness, protecting itself and peace on the planet. Demonstrate fearlessness in the face of a deadly threat. Give aggressors on the teeth. To force the tyrants to live according to the rules adopted in the human dormitory, and not in a wolf pack. So it was in 1940, when England, with the support of America, opposed Hitler, who captured almost all of Europe, and his benevolent partner Uncle Joe. And in the early 80s, when Ronald Reagan fought with the Empire of Evil and its varying gerontocrats. Nevertheless, Vladimir Vladimirovich must still not want to die ahead of time, and the prospect of taking Russia with a nuclear bomb and leaving with Sohi is also unlikely to suit him, and if he explains it, he will understand.
Only you need to explain very intelligibly.