Roof test

The dispute of the Slavs among themselves, especially in the London court, is an exciting event, which is why interest in this process was so great. Is it a joke, two outstanding Russian oligarchs for four months, as long as the court lasted, they talked about the most important thing. About politics, about money and how domestic history was happening in those years that is now customary to call "dashing" not the "damned." And how she was going on in the happy zero and is going on, between us, today, in the years of tenths, which you can’t immediately pick up an accurate epithet.

And it was also a dispute about the meaning of words, the most entertaining of all - for those who understand, of course. In particular, about what the word “roof” means, which the chairmen in the court of Lady Elizabeth Gloucester learned by heart, and with her all the audience of this representation, which was rightfully called the process of the century. What is it with us, The Krysha, what it looks like, who she covers is - this is what old friends discussed in a high London court.

Boris Abramovich claimed that the "roof" is a meaningful concept. It happens that this is a good old racketeering, without frills, and it happens that the roof is shared with his roofsman the most expensive. He gives him the property of the action, fixing the contract with an oral agreement and strong male handshake. Alas, the political situation in the country has changed, and Abramovich simply threw (another very important Russian word) of the partner, forcing actually for nothing to sell the assets of Rusal, Sibneft and ORT.

Worse than that. Taking advantage of the fact that Berezovsky fell out of favor in the Kremlin, Abramovich turned the board and began to dictate the conditions for him. Like, if you want to get at least some money-take what they give. Otherwise, everything will be taken from you, you know the examples yourself. The refugee estimated his losses at 5.5 billion dollars, and this amount, discussed during the process, symbolized the final retribution for the former patronage. With Abramovich, with Voloshin, with Putin and with that Russia, where the former makeer of the kings of them did them all on his mountain. And also with the state roof, which fell on his head, and so swiftly that Boris Abramovich barely managed to hide in his London castle.

Objecting to him, Roman Arkadievich said that the “roof” is a roof and there is, and there is no need to complicate anything. He needed Berezovsky to calmly engage in business and not to be killed. Such were the rules, explained Abramovich Baroness Gloucester, the laws are such, and, as a law -abiding man, Abramovich meekly paid them all: Boris, Badri, Korzhakov. He rolled them with (also an important word, federal meaning) tens of millions, and in return he was allowed to live and honestly earn billions.

Now that the process is completed, we know that the high London court leaned towards the fact that in matters of linguistics the defendant surpassed the plaintiff. Abramovich managed to convince Baroness that the “roof” is when they simply pay, but they don’t take a share. On the contrary, the linguistic knowledge of Berezovsky and his lawyers did not cause confidence in the judge, especially since the plaintiff could not provide signed documents, as is customary in the West. Therefore, Boris Abramovich lost and bitterly says that Judge Gloucester swung at the Holy: she took responsibility to rewrite Russian history. And here we, the subjects and objects of our native history, the heirs of glorious traditions, native speakers and keepers of the language, with all due respect to British legal proceedings, must at least morally support the loser.

And then, you know, to fall in despair at the sight of everything that is committed at home and which is confirmed in the English court - this can be able to. Soberly, solid, reasonable to reflect on the results of the process of the century - this is on the shoulder only to an independent expert. The specified expert brings his shoulders and will say: what, in fact, prevented the roofer from asking the Kryshnika, a certain number of shares - just like that, for order? And how could the modest Roman Arkadievich disagree with him, when his future billions and the only life stood at Kon? Just Berezovsky believed that it would always continue, and did not consider it necessary to fix the contracts with signatures, and his partner knew that under the moon nothing forever, and patiently waited for Boris Abramovich to finally demolish the roof. When he, passionate about his political games, will make a wrong move. And he waited.

However, it is also not necessary to believe an independent expert. It is only necessary to believe your own eyes, turning over detailed protocols of sincere confessions that were heard in the London court. Still his own memory and personal journalistic experience should be believed, especially at the moment when Berezovsky tells how ORT was selected from him. Moreover, unconditionally and with the same force with which you believe in your country and are proud of the native language, which in a certain sense has long become the language of interethnic communication. The loud discussion of our famous compatriots, which completed the other day, confirmed this with all the clarity.