He is not a king

With a smart person and it’s nice to talk. Only first let's agree what we are arguing about.

It is strange that such an author as Stanislav Belkovsky, a subtly feeling text, could see “a call not to touch Putin’s myth” in words ”reigned confusion in the minds, comparable with times, when“ our father turned out to be not a father, but a snug ”.

My articles after November 5, the dates, which I consider a very important milestone in the growing systemic crisis of the Russian government, are devoted not to calls, but to the analysis of the consequences of an irreversible, in my opinion, erosion of the Putin myth.

The innovations proposed on November 5 mean that the kleptocratic regime and its most outstanding mediocrity is realized by the threat that has been hanging over them.

In archaic political cultures, a classic example of which is today's Russian Federation, an extremely important symbolic, sacred role is assigned to the leader of the tribe.

In the eyes of his fellow tribesmen, he should have a magical ability to prevent drought, cover as many females as possible, and marked some new territories with feces of the tribe. If the tribe is involved in a natural exchange, then demand the maximum number of beads for the fiery water produced by the tribe and the tips for the arrows produced by it.

When, for objective reasons, the monsters are no longer able to maintain the myth of the astral abilities of Alfa-Samets in the virtual reality created by them, in the "elites" of the tribe there is a political destabilization expressed by the well-known formula "our father turned out to be ..."

That's about this situation has developed in our Fatherland against the backdrop of a deep economic crisis. In addition, just at this unpleasant moment, the specific leader very inappropriately temporarily found himself in the position of responsible primarily for the failure of the economic agenda in the coming years. And as a result of the well -known combination of the funny leader, such winning and tonic tribes, such as ritual ritual arising from the knees, brutal demonstration of the Kuzkina mother and the spiritual labeling of territories remained.

The amendments forced in an emergency regimen on November 5 foreshadow the rapid liberation of the leader from boring economic duties and the return of the main magical tools to him. Already on November 20, he made a pre -election speech, promising everyone - from the oligarchs to the unemployed - that's it.

The solution is far from basic. The unconscious part of the tribe can perceive this scattering as a shameful desertion of the leader with the most important population population for the survival. In any case, he will have to wander very loudly with his sovereign rattles to cover the increasingly obvious nakedness of the thieves' Putinomics. It may be kind.

Therefore, I understand the bewilderment of a respected colleague when he exclaims: why not we resort to a standard procedure that was implemented a thousand times in such situations in traditional cultures - a symbolic editing of the leader and the purpose of the new, especially since he was already formally prescribed. “Go to reign, sovereign,” a group of decisive men who brought the decree on the resignation of the prime minister will say. And there is a monarchist ritual, a television retinue and canonical exposure of the atrocities of the previous regime, everything will be pulled out.

It still seems to me that Putin is really our last myth. The raped tribal consciousness is tired of endless frustrations and is unlikely to perceive a new mobilizing structure. The script lobbying from a parallel reality will end with a classic stage scene:

S. BELKOVSKY : What are you silent? Shout: "Long live the king Dmitry Anatolyevich!"

The people are silent.