Kill Putin

Femen action with the wax figure of Putin in the Paris Museum of Greven. 2014.

"The easiest way to stop the war in Ukraine is to kill Putin." Under such a heading on April 17, material was released in the German publication Die Welt. This is an interview with an American journalist and political scientist Fred Kaplan, an expert on nuclear weapons, whose words were carried out in the heading. The Tsargrad TV channel decided that the surname of the journalist was not just like that, but a hint of a method of murder and that he, perhaps, is a relative of the Socialist -Revolutionary Fanny Kaplan. Soloviev called the publication "Belly's Casus" and once again threatened with a nuclear blow, saying that "the Nazi regime of Scholyts should be erased from the face of the earth."

The German edition of the article, unfortunately, changed. And this is a bad sign. No need to be afraid to discuss the murder of Putin. At the stake, the fate of not only Ukraine, but the whole world. When the existence of the planet on one side of the scales, and on the other, is the life of one psychopath, this is not a “problem of trolleys” at all. There is no such moral dilemma - to kill or not kill someone who is ready to kill you. The only question is who will be the first. Greta Tunberg should be on the covers of magazines of the whole world with the poster "Kill Putin - save the planet!" Because nothing threatens her today more than him.

But the point is not only in him. The end should be the very possibility of nuclear blackmail. The world needs zero tolerance to it. Closed something about the "nuclear ash" - get a bullet in the forehead. So that every potential psychopath with a nuclear button knows - it will be the same with it.

Not that Putin’s murder was not discussed at all. It is discussed, but not too massively and very careful. Sometimes on an individual level: "Would I have killed Putin, if I had a chance?" Sometimes - on the collective : "Could we kill Putin? Perhaps. But is it worth it?" Or as a real option in the future under certain conditions: "The United States could eliminate Putin in case of inflicting a nuclear blow to Ukraine."

Putting it off after applying nuclear strikes is suicidal behavior. When the first nuclear strikes are delivered, there will be no time to “think”. And they will be applied almost inevitably if the tail cutting down in parts continues, with simultaneous attempts to agree. What are you going to agree with him? He needs such a world that he can turn on his nuclear warhead. Putin does not agree to less. He has already clutched at him with his teeth - and either he will be killed, or he will torment him further.

The reasoning that someone else can come to power in Russia, absurd. The worst than the one who put the world on the brink of a nuclear disaster is serious? The third Reich after Hitler's suicide lasted exactly a week. Goebbels was no better than Hitler, but he stayed with Reich Scancler only one day - and also killed himself. There were no other stubborn in all of Germany. It turned out that everyone wants to live. Yes, this required the occupation of a significant part of the country and merciless bombing, but these will understand faster, you can be sure. Russian society, of course, hurts. And not one Putin for everything is responsible. But he is the same needle in the egg of the empire. Having broken which, you can win it. This option is faster and more reliable than a protracted war, which has every chance to develop into a nuclear at any time.

I have no resources to kill Putin. I do not know how it can be technically implemented. Using a figurine, a detachment of superheroes or controlled by artificial intelligence, killer microdron. But I understand that when the survival of the whole world is at stake, this option should really be considered. Therefore, I urge my colleagues around the world not to be scared of the cries of Putin's service. Discuss the murder of Putin and call for him. This is not just absolutely normal, but also humane.