The ruler and the ruler

Among other things, it is still very interesting to observe . The plot itself is fascinating. Directly, I say, breathtaking when these two are talking about censorship and various other things - the correspondent of GOSTELEKANAL and the chairman of the State Duma Committee on Culture.

The free son of the Russian broadcast asks about the freedom of speech and its possible restrictions on theatrical, opera and other stage. Our famous director says that in the country there’s even a hint ”for censorship, but" this ... is very bad, "and the journalist is wrinkling. The deputy scolds the Constitution, where the ban is prescribed to prohibit, but the interviewer does not agree with him. "And who is the judges ... But if in the framework of the law?!" - A colleague is imposed, and the interlocutor, gloomy by nature, plunges into some completely hopeless prohibitive longing. He advocates "moral restrictions" and gives an understandable example. He came out, they say, "the man is on the forefront, unbuttoned the fly and urinated" - what kind of vulgarity?

In this spirit, they communicate for about twenty minutes, Stanislav Govorukhin and correspondent of Russia-24, and this is a spectacle in itself. The people's deputy against the Basic Law, a state -owned journalist for freedom of speech, and everyone, you see, have his own arguments. You will not come off.

That is why you are looking at the transmission to the end, to the most important sensation. Until the moment when the correspondent concerns the other two serious topics. The Law "On the Russian Nation", supported by Vladimir Putin, and the law under the conditional name "On the need to have a unified ideology in Russia", which one Crimean legislator did not speak to the Duma. And if Govorukhin speaks competently regarding the “need” in the Russian Federation, that is, carefully, in the spirit that we should ask the people at the referendum, but there is no money for this business, then the nation is sparking sharply, harshly, boldly, from the heart.

And here, as people say, catharsis comes. Since Stanislav Sergeyevich, a middle -aged person, is multi -hearted, but quick -tempered and honest in his own way, begins to rebel. He, you see, "does not really understand what is happening." He "knows only that we have been the Russian people for many centuries. And now we are the Russian people, in fact." Although yesterday they were still Soviet - such a paradox. However, he insightfully notice the asked, "there is no Soviet power." Well, who are we? “Russian, Russians - even purely linguistic, it sounds disgusting,” the chairman of the committee is raging, and horror flashes in the eyes of our correspondent.

He again tries to argue monosyllabicly, and again unsuccessfully, and the angry old man with impunity reports to millions of viewers the seditious of thoughts. There is neither Soviet power, nor the Russian, nor the Soviet people, no Russian. And there is the Russian power and the Russian people, and there is no one else in Russia, which we have lost and gained again, there is no. At least find it. In short, in vain President Putin approved this vile bill - about the Russian nation. Such we conclude with viewers.

By the way, I tried to legalize something similar, according to very plausible rumors, to legalize Olga Kovitidi - that very lady from the Crimea, who was concerned about the problem of unanimity. It took her to cancel the constitutional article directly affirming the ideological diversity in the Russian Federation to "ensure the unity of the Russian people." However, Covitidi corrected, and her bill, having hit the ground, changed the subject on the "day of fidelity of the oath" and does not seem to encroach on a single line to the constitution. Govorukhin also as if corrected, but with him, the former and, I hope, the future chief of the election headquarters V.V. Putin, the co -chair of the Central Staff of the ONF, the head of the committee and generally the favorite of the Russian Russian nation, turned out to be much more difficult to cope.

So, Dmitry Peskov fundamentally abandoned the comment, considering it necessary to add that Stanislav Sergeyevich is still a person who is “respectful” by President Putin and conducts a “trust” dialogue with him. In these words, respectful and quiet, if desired one could hear the call to change his mind, but Govorukhin did not heed him. He continues to stubbornly enrolled in Russians of any Tungus with Bashkirs and even Chechens, complacently admitting, however, that multinational Russian citizens can participate in discussions about how to be called. For Stanislav Sergeyevich is absolutely confident in his rightness, and there is no doubt that the direct dialogue with the president will not interfere with the president of the director.

The fact is that he is not for the first time - and it always said goodbye to him. I remember, heading the Putin’s headquarters at the time transitional from the heir to the old king, he let himself and said a lot of things for himself. About the article by Vladimir Vladimirovich, performed by the deepest election meaning, which he read three times - and did not understand what was written there. About the state -forming "United Russia", which has become similar to the CPSU. And about Medvedev, who "keeps silent" - instead of rejoice at Putin's return with Govorukhin. This was also called "drive a wedge into the tandem," for which they were in a mercilessly punished, but Govorukhin was not touched. Then Peskov also made a confused -premising statement - and the scandal was furious.

Deputy and now. A significant actor, an incorrigible patriot and a faithful, albeit grumbling servant of the regime, he has long and very successfully plays the role of a kind of old man-resoner, preoccupied with moral problems. The implacable in relation to, for example, to the intelligentsia, which he elain in the word "shit" in the word. A professional gaze looking around the scene, and if there, in the theater, someone unfasten the fly, then Govorukhin wants to move along it from the toe, introduce censorship and cover the performance. True, age takes its time, and in other cases, the impudent head of the Committee on Culture does not notice how some non -indifferent citizens are watered by this culture. Nevertheless, when necessary, he discovers eagle vigilance and ultimate sensitivity, which we will call after him linguistic.

Well, in fact, what kind of nation is this - "Russians"? From the word "Russia", or what? Unconvincing.

Yes, and if you introduce censorship or moral restrictions, then for everyone. Democracy what you want. So he censors Putin, correcting the obvious absurdity in the law, to which, by the way, his hands will not soon reach such a pace of elite self -burning and self -destruction of economic development. Putin will not lose from censorship, and the Russians, no matter what it means, will once again think about who they are. The overwhelming great -resistant majority, which is in fairness called Pokrymsky, will answer the question asked correctly. And the law, where they will be called a disgusting word, still no one will read, including Stanislav Sergeyevich. Not for that, he works in the Duma in order to deal with stupid things. He serves there a moral reproach.