
Ivan Skripnichenko will be buried in Mias of the Chelyabinsk region - he is from there, his mother and father live there. It is also known that the volunteers were already attacked, as many who guard the memorial near the Kremlin, but last time, in May, they simply pushed into the back and ran away, robbing, and in August a certain “very aggressive ambal” already beat him in the face. Shouting something in defense of Putin, who is supposed to love.
This happened on August 15, and after eight days Ivan died , and so far we can only guess about how closely these two events are. The usual aggression of one of many hired barns, desecrating with their presence and actions, the bridge on which Boris Nemtsov was killed, and the death of a young citizen of the Russian Federation. There was a crime under Art. 111 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, that is, intentional infliction of grievous bodily harm that caused death, or here it is more appropriate to apply some other article. It is clear that Ivan became the victim of the next attack, but the details are unknown.
It is possible that we will have to guess for a long time. It is necessary that the police caught the barns and his associates, interrogated and checked what was said, but this is a difficult task for law enforcement officers, since the matter is clearly political. In other words, it is not a problem to establish the names of the attackers, all of them are recorded in the statement at which the special services pay the fees to the gopniks involved in the beating of the disagreements. However, to disclose their names, to judge them, and even more to say to real terms - from the point of view of the patriot -operative would be a mistake bordering on betrayal. Who then, sorry for the expression, will go to Petrunko the next time splash green in the opposition, beat on the colors and candles and, upset for the president, whom individual renegades do not like, break his nose to the volunteer? They themselves, they will say, go and hooligan, boldly looking into the eyes of the curators, and for now we will rest, the usual fraers with a tin or the apartment will rob.
That is why the reaction of the TFR to the death of Skripnichenko is so predictable: investigators already know from somewhere that there was a "fight" on the Nemtsov bridge, although this does not appear from the testimony. Well, the cameras where the well -known politician shot was probably turned off again, so no persons can be considered. And since this time we are talking about a person whose name fell into Russian news reports only after his death, there is not too much noise.
This is partly even useful for the authorities, to whom the memorial in the very center of Moscow as a daily reminder of an undisclosed murder has long been across the throat. Now, let now other activists, like -minded people and friends of Skripnichenko, constantly on duty at the crime scene, think about whether they should be so stubborn. And if they don’t find a barn, then the Kremlin’s message, addressed by stubborn disagreement, will sound especially loudly and convincingly in his own way.
There is, however, a suspicion that the message will convince few and only strengthen the volunteers of their desire to preserve the memorial and confront the outpatient rats that throw people. And this gives rise to another question, even more important than the one that is combined with the capture of the criminal. In general, it is clear where the bastards come from, ready to rush to people, to cripple people, to kill people. It is also clear where the so -called “postcrymist majority” came from, for the most part, it is hardly wanting to kill everyone who does not like Putin, but supporting his pet literally in everything and completely sincerely does not understand how to treat him otherwise. It is not quite clear why in Russia in any, wildest times, people like Ivan grow.
How so it turns out that, contrary to frenzied reality, they are still in the light and quietly confront evil. This is a completely inexplicable reproduction of good where honor and conscience have been burning for decades, at the same time inspires fear for them, unrecognized brothers, renegades in a folk family, and the hope that not everything is lost. Therefore, it is so painful to think about the brief life and tragic death of Ivan Skripnichenko.
And it’s still bitter to think how many people in Russia and abroad were paid for not loved by Putin. In one form or another, going to the rally, speaking orally or publishing texts, in which the words and deeds or investigated possible crimes of this object were evaluated. Compared to them, a native of Mias of the Chelyabinsk region seems to be the most harmless, because he did not write about the cooperative "Lake" and did not cause unbearable pain to the riot police, hitting them with an umbrella or a plastic bottle during an anti -government demonstration. He just guarded flowers and candles from reproach, and the fact that he died after he incorrectly answered the question about Putin testifies to something infinitely vile and terrible.
About the hatred that they experience in the Kremlin and for the memory of the deceased Boris Nemtsov, and to all disagreed, in a drop, no matter what they do, famous and unknown. And about how every year it is more dangerous not to love Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, the Russian president. Nevertheless, citizens who do not experience this exalted feeling remain in the country, and it cannot be said that there are fewer of them with every killed, planted, produced. True, they do not become anymore, and this means that the sad list will be replenished - at least until the beloved is alive and healthy.