Lies for understanding

Natalia Moral can be congratulated on the victory. With an expensive victory, which will cost her entrance to the country where she lived, worked, paid taxes, met her future husband. Morar won Russia the right to its own right.

But the capabilities of the state in general and its heads in particular were - bend down. For example, one could say aloud that Natalya Morar is not a threat to national security, and let her into the country with parting words continue to more carefully check the facts cited in their publications. Thus, it is not afraid to show that the Russian state is not afraid of. Moreover, telephone law in this case could not have been applied, because there was enough a pair of public words from the lips of Mr. Medvedev, so that the court took into account legal grounds, and not the fears of the Kremlin-White House corporation. It did not happen. Which, in my opinion, proves only one thing - everything in the articles is pure truth. The one that requires an immediate reaction from the country sitting in the highest chair. Well, as you imagine this-the painting by oil “Dmitry Medvedev tearing his right hand (option-Big Brother) with all his somersault-college for violating Russian laws”? .. So I also imagine it badly.

The trouble is that many of his statements can already be finally attributed to the category of “lies for understanding”. It seems that there was a decision regarding Manana Aslanmazyan, but the lawyer does not advise returning to Russia yet - they may not know about the decision of the Constitutional Court or about the fact that he needs to be fulfilled on the border. It seems that the Moscow prosecutor’s office admitted that the authorities violated the law, banning the “marsh of disagreements” on May 6, but a fairy tale has already arisen about an alternative route, allegedly proposed to disagree. If there was such, where are the documents confirming that he was? And again, they recognized as recognized, and now? But nothing now, the train left with the station. That is, the movements of the law towards legality occur where these movements themselves do not change anything. And the general background is the liberator, they say.

Or the same story with the pardon of Khodorkovsky. Medvedev said that issues of execution of punishment cannot be the subject of interstate negotiations. And with him no one was discussing the issue of execution of punishment. They discussed with him the issue of violation of human rights. The same question may well and, if you want, should be the above item. Do not believe - read the declaration. From the preamble: “ The General Assembly proclaims a real universal declaration of human rights as a task, the implementation of which all peoples and states should strive for the implementation of that each person and every organ of society, constantly referring to the real declaration, sought through the enlightenment and education to promote the respect of these rights and freedoms, through national and international progressive measures, universal and effective recognition and implementation and implementation of them. Both among the peoples of the member states of the organization, and among the peoples of the territories under their jurisdiction. "

That is, in this case, we pay tribute to Dmitry Anatolyevich’s diplomatic talent and his homework, but there is a fact of replacement of concepts ... The answer to the question was, as it were, but in fact it was not. Now they will tell me now that I was wearing everyone with my Khodorkovsky. And why do you think this question raised Frau Merkel? Out of a simple desire to put Russia to Russia or because Mikhail Borisovich was sent a translation from the Chita colony? I do not want to upset you, but for Merkel the “Khodorkovsky case” is evidence that the rights of any person in Russia may be violated. And she worries in this situation for us. Not because she is an heavenly angel. And the wings on her shoulder blades do not grow. But because we are ready to deal with us, as with equals, and not as with a Dikar country.

And we get such a wonderful design: we are so rich in energy resources today that we will violate the rights of our citizens, as we want. Moreover, nothing special has broken off from the wealth from wealth, broke off just to those citizens whose horseradish rights are violated, they are protected by the Kremlin wall, cars with flashing lights, Fesseos and the entire power of the state, which, I repeat, has no relation to you.

Which of you feels the power of this power behind you? Which of you is sure that, do not give Gd, the trouble with the citizen, this power will come to the rescue, huh? There is no answer. No, we, of course, are not angels ourselves. Maybe we still flog us and flog the old fashioned way ... Pay attention, a car arsonist appeared in Moscow. This cute idea immediately found a response in the broad masses, and the cars began to set fire to other Russian cities ... It is not to adopt something good from fellow citizens, only the dirty tricks take root. Well, how can you not violate the rights of these people, with permission to say. And after all, you can’t explain to anyone that this people cannot be otherwise.

Oh, I was mistaken, the predecessor of Dmitry Anatolyevich tried to explain. I even remember how at the end of 2006 I was at the international conference of the European Union-Russia in Brussels. And colleagues from different countries all the time asked: "What somes it mean - diki narod?" The then president of Russia devoted these tall words to his people. Maybe he was right? While so wild, to violate his rights, not to reconfigure! Moreover, all in one heap - and those who enthusiastically welcomes a lordly hand in any manifestation - in a affection, whether in beatings ... and those who are not ready to endure criminal "lubrication" on their face. The rights of the latter should especially be violated so that it is disgraced. And do not forget to demonstrate to everyone - it will be exactly that with you. What we will allow ... and at international meetings to smile and lie. So that the etiquette was observed, and the older brothers from the corporation smiled knowingly when he heard this lies.