Vocation

When I read or hear from some journalist a dismissive “we don’t have an opposition” (especially the slaughtered natural philosophers of Latynin and Radzikhovsky are different), my heart is literally doused with blood. And who am I burying almost every year then? Since 2000, I have been burying my - found by the dead, with crushed skulls, thrown out of the windows, mysteriously killed under trains - whom? Young, very young guys - Chervochkin was 23, Anton Starymov was only 20 years old. He buried nine.

We have an opposition, there are plenty of protest activists in the country. Another thing is that in the struggle against a powerful police regime the opposition has no victories. But this is such a regime that small victories are impossible over it, one final is possible. For this regime is stubborn and stupid, he considers any concession to any concession, because he is destined to fall at a time. His reformation is impossible.

There is an opposition, the almost three fourth intelligentsia poorly endure the matingled regime (only a dozen writers of the scoundrels, they just went to the prime minister, bastards!), The regime was morally abandoned for several years now. Why there is no more big victory, this is another story. This is a sad story of the team elite, the so -called leaders of the opposition, and in fact we are talking about a hundred or two influential personalities in the opposition. Here they are guilty. We are guilty of inflating any minor disagreements, combing their own and other people's scratches, in absurdity, stupidity, political inconsistency. In fact, such flammable oppositionists are similar to a simple, non -frying hooligan in the folk environment, such are constantly sensitive among others, constantly yelling: "You said, and!?"

Not so long ago, I wrote an article “ Let's remove the signs! ”, In which I soberly analyzed the opposition. He arranged a look at her forces. So they told me that all these forces were offended. When I wrote that of my text, I had no intention of offending anyone at all. I wanted to point out errors, illusion and weaknesses, in order to make it stronger than my allies, in which I really need. However, some considered it almost their honor, they were handed over to me. There is no need to be offended where it is more constructive to listen to my opinion - a shallow person who has been rowing on this gallery called the "Russian opposition" since 1992.

An erroneous, and very harmful, is the illusion that every ideological camp of the opposition will cope himself. Lefts sacredly believe in their illusion, that now, in the crisis, their time has finally came that they are riding the labor movement and with its help will enter the Kremlin (well, they will receive power). Only here is the problem: there is no labor movement. Mass dismissals and the closure of enterprises did not cause any noticeable labor movement to life. Why it does not exist at the beginning of the 21st century, while it existed a century ago, and the most powerful, I am ready to explain, but not in this article. There is no labor movement, random poor fellows work at the factories who dream of leaving their plants and living differently, but they just do not know how, and they do not know how. It makes no sense for them to fight for their jobs. The personnel working class has long come Kirdyk. For twenty years in Russia, in fact, not a single mass performance of workers. The miners, who appeared in 1998 in Moscow, did not count. They did not come here on their own. But contrary to common sense, the left is stubbornly disconnected. They continue to believe that they will cope alone, believe in their illusion: the existence of the labor movement.

Nationalists in 2005, after the first "Russian march", was eager for love for themselves. They probably felt the most powerful in the opposition. Four years later, they are far from as self -confident as they were. Part of Jesus knocked out the power from them, disconnecting them with all possible provocations, pursuing them and repressing them. I hope they came close to the awareness of the need for a wide coalition of all opposition forces. In politics, the category of "like - do not like" should not be used. The categories should be used "politically profitable" or "politically disadvantage." It is politically beneficial for nationalists to participate in the wide coalition of the opposition.

I call the illusions of those who call themselves proudly "democrats" erroneous and very harmful. They beat themselves in the chest and believe that only for this their self -name should their power belong to them. As nationalists, the category of "Russians" supposedly gives them the right, so the Democrats category "democrat" seemed to give them a moral right to power. But this is a conceited illusion in both cases. And democracy is just a modern way of the existence of societies, the procedure for the functioning of power and the change of power in the state. Of course, you can consider yourself chosen on the basis of belonging to the supporters of democracy, but this is stupidity. Moreover, no privileges are supposed for this. It is necessary to modestly join the forces of the opposition that really fight for the holding of free elections in the country, to all the forces of the opposition, some for. And do not stand lonely, pouting in ecstasy self -assembly.

Liberals are placed next to the Democrats. These are even more proud of themselves and turned themselves into a heightened believers, but only believers into a capitalist economy. On this basis, they are intolerant of believers in other ideologies. Here we are dealing with a religious nature of fanaticism. It is interesting that terry liberals (well, such as Chubais or Novodvorskaya) are belligerently anti -democratic. Didn't Chubais admit that the free elections, most likely, would lead to the authorities of the "not those" leaders and "not those" forces, that is, the wrong for Chubais, anti -bourgeois?

All these manners are stupid, narcissistic and stupid fanatics of their own ideological sects should be left. Growing on possible allies in the fight against the regime, disputing their ideologies, is the last thing. Crowding deprives us of all victory. Meanwhile, stupid Galdage, contesting, petty irritation by other people's actions tremble in the air, in the political air of the Russian opposition. He tried to unite, but then the brave Kasparov to rally everyone, all the forces of the opposition in the Coalition of another Russia, these forces gathered on July 11 and 12, 2006. What was promised power! But soon they scattered with a screech, having been afraid of each other. And Kasparov scattered a little later, filled up, returned to the brothers in ideology and in the social class, to the bourgeoisie.

But the idea of ​​a wide coalition remained. Last summer, it was embodied in a supreme strategy-31 convenient for the entire opposition. Well, yes, it so happened that I conceived a strategy-31. No need to dispute me and therefore refuse to participate in a promising political project, and very promising, I must understand. Forget what I came up with. Consider this is your strategy. Strategy-31 promises to lead us inevitably to victory. The main slightly strategy is to give citizens a long -term plan of the political campaign (in return for all scattered pumpkins); First, we drive ourselves the square, and then all of Russia. Strategy-31 is not a national-Bolshevik undertaking, it is a plan for a political struggle for all opposition forces, therefore, do not try to nod here for some reason for the National Bolsheviks.

In the spring, I announced my intention to be a candidate in the 2012 election. In order to primarily rally the opposition together, and in order to serve as the cause for the imminent future conflict between the few and the opposition of the majority. Again, do not dispute me as the creator of the National Bolshevik movement. I want to become a figure consolidating the whole opposition. For this, if I look closely and do not snort, there are many advantages. I don’t have a coward, I have determination, I am respected for honesty, I am not a bourgeois, but this is important because the Russian people are far from a bourgeois, but even an anti -bourgeoisie. I want to serve as a common cause. I have accumulated fame and popularity such that it is a sin not to use it for a common cause. I am an intellectual and was a worker. The left does not have such a promoted figure by 2012. Nationalists do not have. If bourgeois parties do not blow out or put forward a deliberately correct, acceptable only for the bourgeoisie of the candidate, we will be able to have a single candidate in my person. I urge the opposition and its leaders, and even more so the ordinary activists to comprehend both the strategy-31 and the 2012 election. Carefully comprehend, because if you understand carefully and unprincipledly, you will recognize my case. It is not me important, it is important that I can consolidate the forces of the opposition, to become a pretext for the conflict.

So the last hopes of "decent", moderate oppositionists disappear. The results of the elections on October 11 are humiliating and mocking, right? And they jumped around these elections, sniffed, the apparatus is the most, and now they jumped. Wiped? "Theory of small deeds" ... got? Now you realized that you live in the zone? Has?

In the police officer, Russia can only be an effective opponent of the regime. The consolidation of the forces of the opposition should occur around the brightest figure of a radical opposition. Yes, and I am imperfect, but I come better than others. Yes, you have no others! I am waiting for you and all on October 31 at 18 o’clock on the triumphal square.