
The “ march for the federalization of Siberia ”, planned in Novosibirsk on August 17, at first glance may seem exclusively an underground action that has nothing to do with the Russian political situation. How is it-with such and such support of the President of Russia with an excited “Crimean”, with such a vertical of power, with such a control of power structures behind public moods, to talk about some kind of Siberian Republic there and put forward requirements that can be regarded as separatism, that is, as a criminalism?
However, I would like to remind you that the DPR DPR Andrei Purgin came up with the “Donetsk Republic” of the DNR DPR, and then this organization was perceived in Ukraine and Russia as a bunch of marginalists. Both Viktor Yanukovych and other Donetsk bonzes were reopened from Purgin. Today, Purgin - a slurred person with a heavy face of drunks - carries out his project for real: the Donetsk Republic found sponsors, mercenaries, tanks and even “beech” to protect the Purginsky sky from the Malaysian liners. And Purgin began with comrades with supporting the requirements of federalization of Ukraine, more than once voiced by the highest leaders of Russia. Both Vladimir Putin and Sergey Lavrov, and other Russian officials emphasized that only the independence of the regions can save the Ukrainian state from decay.
And Russia - it is already a federation. This is not even a very big secret, Russia is generally called that. So why cannot you demand more independence for the regions, to count on the fact that the main decisions of their development will be made in Novosibirsk, Kazan, Grozny, Vladivostok, and not in Moscow? After all, the independence of the regions is the key to success, as Putin himself believes. Or what is good for the Ukrainian, for Russian death?
The propagandists who live in Moscow, who order this picture, who create this picture, who live in Moscow and confident that this picture will end for this picture for Russia itself, the leaders of the country living in Moscow are simply unable to realize the hatred of the center in the Russian province, robbed, marginalized, given to temporary workers-feudals. This hatred is smoothed out only by one - rent. Moscow pays the regions money so that everything remains as before. There are practically no other restraining factors for the isolation of Russian regions.
And here the question arises: is this annuity for a long time in conditions of tightening sanctions, the inevitable collapse of the banking sector, a deterioration in the situation with the sale of energy carriers? And whether in a situation of the financial failure of the Center for the idea of the Siberian or Far Eastern Republic it would seem marginal - I do not even mention the greater independence of the Republic of Tatarstan or Chechnya, and so everything has long been clear with this.
Putin drove Russia into a logical trap. On the one hand, on the eve of the economic collapse of the state, the population should convince the population that only a strong single country can find a way out of the crisis. On the other hand, the destabilization of the situation in a neighboring country was chosen as a means of diverting the attention of the population from economic failure. The country that was unified before Russian intervention - but it turned out that the autonomous republic can lightly hold a referendum and leave the composition of this state, and any area can simply declare itself on the central square of the main city - op -las! - The People’s Republic, and Russian television will admire this rally will. And now people who watch this television and understand that all this is not happening in Africa, but literally a few hours of driving - why can't they want to arrange a people's republic at home? Or do they love the local authorities with prosecutors and bandits? Or will the "People's Governor" will not be found among them?
I don’t know if Putin and his environment are understood, what they made. Why is the Donetsk People’s Republic good, and the Siberian People’s Republic is bad? Why is the People's Governor of Donetsk - a hero, and the People’s Governor of Novosibirsk is a criminal? Ah, no one chose him? And who, sorry, chose the national mayor of Slavyansk? Surkov? And the People's Mayor of Sevastopol, with whom Putin himself signed an agreement on the accession of the city to Russia? Let it now sign something with the People’s mayor of Vladivostok! Or Vladivostok is worse than Sevastopol? Can you find out what? Maybe Vladivostok will also want to become a subject, not the object of the Russian Federation? You say, impossible?
No, Vladimir Vladimirovich, - thanks to you now everything is possible. And even more.