In uniform

And the Reichstagi burn and burn ...

November 30, 2009 Alexander Ryklin

For me personally, the most terrible result of the tragedy with the “Neva express” (after the death of people, of course) is the lack of any hope in the foreseeable future to find out the truth about what happened. Because I never believe them. And not a single sober sensible person in Russia never believes them.

Since we caught them hundreds of times on a monstrous lies. (They didn’t forget about the “harmless” gas in the “Nord-Ost”? And about the Beslan? About the Kursk submarine?) Since we understand-they are cynical, unprincipled, ruthless. Since they hold us for unrequited cattle - we can get any version. Well, the one who, at this historical stage in the development of Putin’s authoritarianism and Medvedev’s modernization, will seem more preferable to them. I am alive with this meeting. “Well, the fraternals:“ fascikas ”, the Caucasus or the Technogenka?” ... - “No, the boss ... The Caucasus is not rolling now - this will turn out that we again have no stability there. The question is - what did ten years do? Yes, and Ramzan will be upset ... " - “And I am categorically against the technogenic disaster. Sayano-Shushenskaya hydroelectric power station is you not enough for you? By the way, I also played for the attack ... They didn’t listen to me in vain ... It would already be possible to twist some nuts ... And so-direct damage to the image of power. ” “Or maybe these are the machinations of Western special services?” Well, so that we do not end to the end from the knees ... ” -“ Do not fool, for God's sake - a serious story ... ” -“ Well, what? We decided - "fasciki." -“Well,“ fascists ”, so“ fascikas ... ”-“ Listen, what was there in reality? ” - "And hell knows ... do you care?"

And if not from them, then what ways do we have to find out the truth about what happened? Is there a political organization in Russia, which will take the courage to say: “We are creating an independent expert commission that will eventually present its conclusions to the public.” Who could enter such a commission? For example, techies. Let someone already explain to me why in the place of the explosion, as can be seen from the photographs, there is actually no funnel. A directed explosion, say. Well, maybe ... but others say that during an explosion of seven kilograms of TNT, the funnel is formed in any case ...

And I would also like to hear expert reports (or read certificates) on the topic to whom it is actually profitable to let trains lead in the center of Russia now. Wahhabis? Nazis? Or maybe the "office"?

For example, in 1999 I could not imagine that special services could be involved in the explosions of houses in Moscow. And even the story with the Ryazan Hexogen did not shake my confidence. I then rejected this version with anger and disgust ... But the years passed, and my naivety gradually dispersed ... So now it is necessary to make certain efforts to prove to me that the Russian special services did not undermine the peace train. And to present to me evidence of their non -involvement ... convincing evidence.

And I would also like to hear any smart independent forecasts from some smart independent specialists. Let approximate or even contradictory. Let one say that he will now begin to thunder throughout Russia and give his arguments, and the other, that this case is a single and a series of terrorist attacks should not be expected, because and that's why. Then I will solve which of the proposed versions seems to me most convincing. The main thing is that I am confident in their non -junction.

Now the question is-why should I, in principle, know the truth about the true reasons for the catastrophe of the Moscow-Piter train? Yes, for a simple reason - because my children could go in this train (and yours, by the way, too). They were not there by a pure chance, by a happiest coincidence for me. There are, of course, other reasons. But this is the main one.

Photos of RIA Novosti